[2 + 2] processes through enyne cycloisomerizations using
platinum or gold catalysts developed by Malacria11 and
Cossy.12 However, a thermally driven stepwise [2 + 2]
cycloaddition in a Ficini manner using ynamides remained
elusive.13 Our own efforts in trying to develop this cycload-
dition reaction lasted for 13 years. We report here our first
success in a Ficini [2 + 2] cycloaddition of ynamides.
Scheme 2. Thermal Ficini [2 + 2] Cycloadditions of Ynamide
Over the last 15 years, we failed numerous attempts at a
successful Ficini [2 + 2] cycloaddition of ynamides using
lactam- or oxazolidinone-substituted ynamides under thermal
and/or Lewis-acidic conditions.14 In the current pursuit of
this cycloaddition, we chose to employ N-sulfonyl-substituted
ynamides because the nitrogen pair of the sulfonamido group
is more delocalized toward the alkyne.15 Therefore, N-
sulfonyl-substituted ynamides possess enhanced nucleophi-
licity over simple amide- or urethane-substituted ynamides,
and they are also less stable than amide- or urethane-
substituted ynamides.
Our next best option would appear to again involve Lewis
acids, which had not been successful over the years when
using lactam- or oxazolidinone-substituted ynamides.14 More
specifically, our efforts were derailed when using Lewis acids
because hydro-halogenations of ynamides, leading to R-
halogenated enamides, were a serious competing path-
way.14,16,17 In addition, when hydro-halogenation is not
competing, possible hydrolysis under these suitable Lewis
acids represents another challenge associated with ynamides.
Consequently, much of ynamide chemistry7a has been limited
to halo-substituted Lewis acids that do not involve metals
such as Mg, Ti, Sn, Si, B, Al, or In [i.e., CuX2 or ZnX2 is
feasible] or Lewis acids with OTf serving as the counter-
anion. As a result, we screened a small sample of Lewis
acids as summarized in Table 1.
However, to our disappointment, N-sulfonyl-substituted
ynamides such as 7 and 10 did not undergo any desired
thermal cycloaddition (Scheme 2). Even when we used
quinone and adopt the more electron-rich para-methoxy
benzensulfonyl group [Mbs] as shown in ynamide 10, no
appreciable amount of the desired cycloadduct 9b was
observed, thereby further underscoring the superior stability
of ynamides over ynamines.
(8) For recent examples, see: (a) Li, H.; Antoline, J. E.; Yang, J.-H.;
Al-Rashid, Z. F.; Hsung, R. P. New J. Chem. 2010, 34, 1309. (b) Kramer,
S.; Madsen, J. L. H.; Rottla¨nder, M.; Skrydstrup, T. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
2758. (c) Banerjee, B.; Litvinov, D. N.; Kang, J.; Bettale, J. D.; Castle,
S. L. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2650. (d) Gourdet, B.; Rudkin, M. E.; Lam, H. W.
Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2554. (e) Jia, W.; Jiao, N. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2000.
(f) DeKorver, K. A.; Hsung, R. P.; Lohse, A. G.; Zhang, Y. Org. Lett.
2010, 12, 1840. (g) Burley, G. A.; Davies, D. L.; Griffith, G. A.; Lee, M.;
Singh, K. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 980. (h) Yamasaki, R.; Terashima, N.;
Sotome, I.; Komagawa, S.; Saito, S. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 480.
(9) (a) Riddell, N.; Villeneuve, K.; Tam, W. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3681.
(b) Cockburn, N.; Karimi, E.; Tam, W. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5762.
(10) Kohnen, A. L.; Mak, X. Y.; Lam, T. Y.; Dunetz, J. R.; Danheiser,
R. L. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 3815.
Table 1. Cu(II)-Catalyzed Ynamide-[2 + 2] Cycloaddition
(11) (a) Marion, F.; Coulomb, J.; Courillon, C.; Fensterbank, L.;
Malacria, M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1509. (b) Marion, F.; Coulomb, J.; Servais,
A.; Courillon, C.; Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 3856.
Also see: (c) Soriano, E.; Marco-Contelles, J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9345.
(12) (a) Couty, S.; Meyer, C.; Cossy, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 6726. (b) Couty, S.; Meyer, C.; Cossy, J. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1809.
(13) For a beautiful equivalent of this reaction using ynol-ethers and
AgNTf2, see: Sweis, R. F.; Schramm, M. P.; Kozmin, S. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 7442.
temp time yield
[°C]
entry
R
solvent
catalyst [mol %]
[h]a [%]b
(14) Mulder, J. A.; Kurtz, K. C. M.; Hsung, R. P.; Coverdale, H. A.;
Frederick, M. O.; Shen, L.; Zificsak, C. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1547.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10: H CH3CN In(OTf)2 [30]
10: H CH3CN Sc(OTf)3 [30]
10: H CH3CN Cu(OTf)2 [10]
10: H CH3CN AgSbF6 [10]
10: H CH3CN AgSbF6 [10]
-15
1
1
4
5
2
--c
--c
--d
--d
--d
-15
25-80
0-80
50-120
10: H CH2Cl2 CuCl2/AgSbF6 [20/42] -78-25 10 e5d e
,
12: Me CH2Cl2 CuCl2/AgSbF6 [20/60]
12: Me CH2Cl2 CuCl2/AgSbF6 [20/60]
12: Me CH2Cl2 CuCl2/AgSbF6 [20/60]
-40
-15
0
1
1
1
72
77
76
(15) While sulfonamides [R1(SO2)-N(H)R2] are more acidic than amides
R1CO2N(H)R2 in general because of the overall stability difference between
the respective conjugate bases [as one referee kindly pointed out], sulfonyl-
substituted ynamides [or enamides] are more reactive and less stable than
simple amide or urethane-substituted ynamides [or enamide]. The nitrogen
lone pair in the former is more delocalized into the alkyne [or alkene motif]
and more into the carbonyl group in the latter. Likewise, but in a reverse
sense, for iminium ion chemistry, sulfonyl-substituted iminium species are
more stable and less reactive than straight N-acyl iminium ions because
the nitrogen lone pair in the former is more involved in the π-donation to
the carbocation. See: Royer, J.; Bonin, M.; Micouin, L. Chem. ReV. 2004,
104, 2311.
a Time for syringe pump addition of a solution of 10 [or 12] and enone.
b Isolated yields. c Hydrolysis of 10 was the major outcome. d No
reactionsrecovered starting material 10. e Polymerization was the major
outcome in addition to hydrolysis.
Initial failure is quite evident in entries 1-6 when using
ynamide 10. However, after observing a trace amount of the
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 17, 2010
3781