aldehydes catalyzed by prolinol ethers.5,6 The nitro group
at para (compound 1) and ortho (compound 2) have been
chosen as EWGs because of its known influence for
increasing the acidity at the benzylic position.7 Moreover, 1
and 2 are both cheap and commercially available, have
nucleophilicities similar to those of cyanoesters,8 widely used
in organocatalysis,9 and have demonstrated a high synthetic
versatility10 (Scheme 1).
Table 1. Screening for the Addition of p-Nitrophenylacetonitrile
1 to Crotonaldehyde
Scheme 1
.
Nitrophenylacetonitriles as Versatile Nucleophiles in
Organocatalytic Michael Additions
t
yielda deb, ref 12 ee (%) ee (%)
entry cat. additive (h)
(%)
4a:4′a
4a
4′a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
I
I
I
I
PhCO2H 40
90
95
63
65
60
59:41
63:37
60:40
63:37
61:39
63:37
60:40
60:40
61:39
90
90
84
84
64
89
89
88
88
78
AcOLi
AcONa
20
24
DABCO 24
I
TMAF
AcOLi
AcOLi
40
40
24
24
24
Ic
II
93
91
86
90
70
84e
82e
54e
III AcOLi
IV AcOLi
-50d
15
-62d
16
Additionally, the high acidity transferred by the nitro group
to the benzylic position has been exploited to epimerize the
center to the most stable diastereoisomer by cyclization into
lactones. These lactones can be obtained in a highly enantio-
and diastereoselective manner. Once the temporary activating
group has exerted its function, it can be transformed into
other fuctional groups without affecting the integrity of the
created stereogenic centers (Scheme 1).
Crotonaldehyde (3a) was chosen as a starting aldehyde
for optimizing reactions with compound 1 (Table 1). The
use of the Jørgensen-Hayashi catalyst I11 allowed us to
obtain a 59:41 diastereomeric mixture of Michael adducts
in 90% yield under standard conditions, using benzoic acid
as additive and THF/H2O as solvent12 (entry 1). The easy
decomposition of these aldehydes in the HPLC columns
a After flash chromatography. b By HPLC. c Reaction at 0 °C. d The
other enantiomer was obtained with catalyst III. e Conversion.
made necessary their transformation into alcohols (4a and
4′a) before determining their optical purity. NaBH4 reduction
on the reaction crude of the Michael addition,13 once the
solvent (THF and H2O) was eliminated under vacuum,
allowed us to determine by HPLC an ee next to 90% for
both alcohols (entry 1).
In the absence of additive, the reaction did not take place.
The use of nonacidic additives reduced the reaction times
(entries 2-5), with AcOLi providing the best results (entry
2).14 Different additives, solvents,12 or a decrease in the
temperature did not produce any significant improvement
in the ee (entry 6). The use of other catalysts like II-IV
provided lower yields and enantiomeric excesses (entries
7-9).
(5) For a review of iminium catalysis, see: Erkkila¨, A.; Majander, I.;
Pihko, P. M. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 5416
.
(6) Review articles about organocatalytic Michael addition, see: (a)
Almasi, D.; Alonso, D. A.; Na´jera, C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18,
299. (b) Tsogoeva, S. B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 1701. (c) Vicario, J. L.;
To control the configuration at the benzylic carbon, we
took advantage of its intrinsic acidity to epimerize it to the
most stable isomer in a cyclic substrate.15 To our delight,
when the epimeric mixture of alcohols 4a and 4′a was treated
with H2SO4 in AcOH,16 diastereomerically pure lactone 6a
Bad´ıa, D.; Carrillo, L. Synthesis 2007, 14, 2065
.
(7) 12.3 is the pKa value of p-nitrophenylacetonitrile in DMSO. See:
Bordwell, F. G.; Cheng, J.-P.; Bausch, M. J.; Bares, J. E. J. Phys. Org.
Chem. 1988, 1, 209.
(8) Kaumanns, O.; Appel, R.; Lemek, T.; Seeliger, F.; Mayr, H. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 75–81.
(9) (a) Saaby, S.; Bella, M.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 8120. (b) Lo´pez-Cantarero, J.; Cid, M. B.; Poulsen, T. B.; Bella, M.;
Garc´ıa Ruano, J. L.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7062.
(10) (a) Gaudemer, A.; Nguyen-Van-Duong, K.; Shahkarami, N.; Achi,
S. S.; Frostin-Rio, M.; Pujol, D. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 4095. (b) Sheppeck,
J. E., II; Gilmore, J. L.; Tebben, A.; Xue, C.-B.; Liu, R.-Q.; Decicco, C. P.;
Duan, J. J.-W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 2769. (c) Boedeker, J.;
Fieblinger, D.; Koeppel, H.; Radeglia, R. Z. Chem. 1988, 183. (d) Allen,
C. F. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1925, 47, 1733.
(13) NaBH4 reduction of the diastereomerically pure aldehydes, separated
from the crude by flash chromatography, produce epimerization into their
thermodinamic mixture of 4a/4′a.
(14) For other examples where AcOLi has been used, see: (a) Wang,
Y.; Li, P.; Liang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, J. Chem. Commun. 2008, 1232. (b)
Garc´ıa Ruano, J. L.; Marcos, V.; Alema´n, J. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4435.
(15) This strategy has been previously used. See, for example: (a) Garc´ıa
Ruano, J. L.; de Haro, T.; Singh, R.; Cid, M. B. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73,
1150. (b) Brandau, S.; Landa, A.; Franzen, J.; Marigo, M.; Jorgensen, K. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4305. (c) Valero, G.; Schimer, J.; Cisarova,
I.; Vesely, J.; Moyano, A.; Rios, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 1943.
(16) Corrie, J. E. T.; Munasinghe, V. R. N. J. Labelled Compd.
Radiopharm. 2005, 48, 231.
(11) (a) Marigo, M.; Wabnitz, T. C.; Fielenbach, D.; Jørgensen, K. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 794. (b) Hayashi, Y.; Gotoh, H.; Hayashi,
T.; Shoji, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4212. For a review of chiral
diarylprolinol ether catalysis, see: Palomo, C.; Mielgo, A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7876.
(12) For more details see the Supporting Information.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 16, 2010
3587