Table 1 Tm values (1C) of duplexes formed by ONs 7–10 and 12 with their complementary strandsa
RNA
DNA
RNA selectivity
Tm
DTm
(DTm/mod.)
Tm
DTm
(DTm/mod.)
DTm (RNA) ꢁ DTm (DNA)
—
+5
+10
+13
+17
ONs
12
7
8
9
10
48
49
51
55
62
—
—
52
48
45
46
49
—
—
+1
+3
+7
+14
(+1.0)
(+1.5)
(+2.3)
(+2.3)
ꢁ4
ꢁ7
ꢁ6
ꢁ3
(ꢁ4.0)
(ꢁ3.5)
(ꢁ2.0)
(ꢁ0.5)
The UV melting experiments were carried out in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 100 mM NaCl at a scan rate of 0.5 1C minꢁ1
a
at 260 nm with target strand, 50-r(AGCAAAAAACGC)-30 or 50-d(AGCAAAAAACGC)-30. Final concentration of each ON was 4 mM.
Notes and references
1 (a) N. Dias and C. A. Stein, Mol. Cancer Ther., 2002, 1, 347;
(b) W.-H. Pan and G. A. Clawson, J. Cell. Biochem., 2006, 98, 14;
(c) I. Tamm and M. Wagner, Mol. Biotechnol., 2006, 33, 221.
2 S. Obika, D. Nanbu, Y. Hari, K. Morio, Y. In, T. Ishida and
T. Imanishi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 8735.
3 (a) S. K. Singh, P. Nielsen, A. A. Koshkin and J. Wengel, Chem.
Commun., 1998, 455; (b) A. A. Koshkin, S. K. Singh, P. Nielsen,
V. K. Rajwanshi, R. Kumar, M. Meldgaard, C. E. Olsen and
J. Wengel, Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 3607.
4 T. Imanishi and S. Obika, J. Synth. Org. Chem., Jpn., 1999, 57, 77.
5 S. Obika, D. Nanbu, Y. Hari, J. Andoh, K. Morio, T. Doi and
T. Imanishi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 5401.
6 (a) M. Meldgaard and J. Wengel, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1,
2000, 3539; (b) P. Srivastava, J. Barman, W. Pathmasiri,
O. Plashkevych, M. Wenska and J. Chattopadhyaya, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2007, 129, 8362; (c) S. M. A. Rahman, T. Imanishi and
S. Obika, Chem. Lett., 2009, 38, 512.
7 K. Morita, C. Hasegawa, M. Kaneko, S. Tsutsumi, J. Sone,
T. Ishikawa, T. Imanishi and T. Koizumi, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett., 2002, 12, 73.
8 O. P. Varghese, J. Barman, W. Pathmasiri, O. Plashkevych,
D. Honcharenko and J. Chattopadhyaya, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2006, 128, 15173.
9 (a) S. M. A. Rahman, S. Seki, S. Obika, H. Yoshikawa,
K. Miyashita and T. Imanishi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
4886; (b) K. Miyashita, S. M. A. Rahman, S. Seki, S. Obika and
T. Imanishi, Chem. Commun., 2007, 3765.
10 (a) Y. Hari, S. Obika, R. Onishi, K. Eguchi, T. Osaki, H. Oishi and
T. Imanishi, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2006, 14, 1029; (b) M. Mitsuoka,
T. Kodama, R. Ohnishi, Y. Hari, T. Imanishi and S. Obika,
Nucleic Acids Res., 2008, 37, 1225.
Fig.
2
Enzymatic stability of 50-d(TTTTTTTTXT)-30 against
Crotalus admanteus venom phosphodiesterase (CAVP, Pharmacia
Biotech). X = 20,40-BNA with cyclic urea structure-T (open diamond)
(ON 11); natural DNA-T (closed square) (ON 13); 20,40-BNA(LNA)-T
(closed triangle) (ON 14); 20,40-BNANC[NH]-T (closed diamond)
(ON 15); ENA-T (open circle) (ON 16); 20,40-BNANC[NMe]-T
(open square) (ON 17); phosphorothioate-T (closed circle) (ON 18)
and 20,40-BNACOC-T (open triangle) (ON 19). Experiments
were performed at 37 1C in 100 mL of buffer containing 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM MgCl2, 0.75 nmol each ON and CAVP
(0.175 mg).
of BNAs can be attributed to steric hindrance around the
phosphodiester linkage rather than the elements composing
the bridge structure.
11 K. Morita, M. Takagi, C. Hasegawa, M. Kaneko, S. Tsutsumi,
J. Sone, T. Ishikawa, T. Imanishi and M. Koizumi, Bioorg. Med.
Chem., 2003, 11, 2211.
In conclusion, we successfully synthesized novel bridged
nucleic acid monomer 5 bearing cyclic urea structure and
incorporated it into ONs. To the best of our knowledge, this
is the first example of a nucleic acid analogue with a bridged
structure between 20- and 40-positions containing a carbonyl
group. Without any distortion of a helical structure brought
about by the urea bridge, ONs containing 5 formed a stable
duplex with RNA complement in a highly RNA selective
manner. Nuclease resistance of this nucleic acid analogue is
abundantly higher than that of natural DNA and 20,40-
BNA(LNA) and is also slightly higher than that of phosphoro-
thioate. The characteristics of this nucleic acid analogue are
essential for application to antisense technology, and research
in this direction is now in progress.
12 S. M. Freier and K.-H. Altmann, Nucleic Acids Res., 1997, 25, 4429.
13 N. Albæk, M. Petersen and P. Nielsen, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 7731.
14 A part of this work was presented at the 6th International
Symposium on Nucleic Acids Chemistry (Takayama, Japan);
A. Yahara, M. Nishida, T. Baba, T. Kodama, T. Imanishi and
S. Obika, Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 2009, 53, 11.
15 H. Staudinger and J. Meyer, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1919, 2, 635.
16 Energy-minimized structure of 5 was calculated using HF/6-31G*
model (Spartan ’06, Wavefunction Inc) and compared with those
of 20,40-BNACOC and PrNA. We made a brief discussion of the
structure–RNA affinity relationship, see Fig. S5 (ESIw).
17 C. Altona and M. Sundaralingam, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, 95, 2333.
18 A. De Mesmaeker, C. Lesueur, M. O. Bevierre, A. Waldner,
V. Fritsch and R. M. Wolf, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996,
35, 2790.
19 A. Lauritsen and J. Wengel, Chem. Commun., 2002, 530.
20 (a) P. Nielsen and J. K. Dalskov, Chem. Commun., 2000, 1179;
(b) P. Nielsen, N. K. Christensen and J. K. Dalskov, Chem.–Eur.
J., 2002, 8, 712.
21 S. Kumar, M. H. Hansen, N. Albæk, S. I. Steffansen, M. Petersen
and P. Nielsen, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 6756.
A part of this work was supported by the Program for
Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Sciences of the
National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO).
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 5283–5285 | 5285