such as diacetoxyiodobenzene, 2-iodoxybenzoic acid, and
FeCl3 in dichloroethane, either the cascade reaction failed
or lower yields were achieved (entries 2-6).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Tetrahydronaphthaline Derivatives
Various arylboronic acids were then reacted with vinyl
dimethylphosphonate in DCE with Mn(OAc)3 as an oxidant
under optimized conditions (Table 1).10,11 Para-substituted
phenylboronic acids provided the corresponding naphthaline
derivatives 1b-h with moderate to good yields (entries
7-13). A lower yield was achieved with the ortho-F-
substituted phenyl boronic acid (f 1i, entry 14) and by using
ortho-tolylboronic or ortho-ethoxyboronic acid the reaction
failed (not shown in the table) clearly documenting that steric
effects, as expected, play an important role in the initial
intermolecular aryl radical addition reaction. We found that
phenylvinylsulfone is a suitable radical acceptor for our
double addition/homolytic substitution process. Products 1j-l
were isolated in acceptable yields (entries 15-17). However,
with methyl acrylate and with acrylonitrile as acceptors, only
low yields of the corresponding tetrahydronaphthalene
derivatives 1m and 1n were obtained in the reaction with
phenylboronic acid under the applied conditions (entries 18
and 19).
was derived from a double olefin addition with subsequent
homolytic aromatic substitution (see discussion on the mech-
anism below).6 This remarkable cascade reaction comprises
three C-C bond forming steps!7 Transition-metal-mediated
addition of arylboronic acids to 2 equiv of an alkyne and
subsequent cyclization to give naphthalene derivatives have been
reported.8 However, analogous metal-mediated reactions by
using alkenes as acceptors leading to tetrahydronaphthalenes,
as reported herein, are unknown. The assignment of the relative
configuration was based on NMR spectroscopy by careful
analysis of the vicinal 3J(CCCP) coupling constants.9
Interestingly, we found that reaction of phenylboronic acid
and methyl acrylate with Mn(OAc)3 in the presence of dioxygen
(balloon, 1 atm) did not provide the targeted tetrahydronaph-
thalene derivative but delivered product 2a as a result of a
radical hydroxyarylation (Scheme 3, Table 1, entry 1).11 Radical
Table 1. Reaction of Various Arylboronic Acids with Various
Olefins
entry R1 R2
R3
solvent dr(cis/trans) no. yield[%]
a
1
2
3
H
H
H
H
H
H
CH3
Ph
F
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
F
PO(OMe)2 DCE
6.:1
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
1g
1h
1i
1j
1k
1l
65
45
20
0
10
0
64
67
57
60
45
44
34
33
48
44
49
27
19
a
PO(OMe)2 DCM
5.3:1
7.0:1
-
6.2:1
-
a
PO(OMe)2 TFT
a
4b
5c
6d
7
PO(OMe)2 DCE
Scheme 3. Oxidative Radical Hydroxyarylation
a
PO(OMe)2 DCE
a
PO(OMe)2 DCE
a
PO(OMe)2 DCE
7.0:1
4.5:1
4.8:1
4.1:1
3.9:1
3.5:1
7.0:1
3.4:1
1.8:1
1:1.3
1.3:1
1.7:1
1:4.0
a
8
9
PO(OMe)2 DCE
a
PO(OMe)2 DCE
a
10 Cl
11 Br
12
13 OCH3
14
15
16 Cl
17 Ph
18
PO(OMe)2 DCE
a
PO(OMe)2 DCE
a
I
PO(OMe)2 DCE
a
PO(OMe)2 DCE
a
H
H
PO(OMe)2 DCE
hydroxyalkylations are well established;12 however, the corre-
sponding arylhydroxylation process is not well investigated to
date.13 This is not unexpected since, due to the high reactivity
of aryl radicals, intermolecular aryl radical additions are
generally very difficult to achieve.14 A slightly better yield was
obtained for the reaction with acrylonitrile under the same
H
H
H
H
H
SO2Pha
SO2Pha
SO2Pha
CO2Mee
CNe
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
H
H
1m
1n
19
a 6 equiv of olefin were used. b Diacetoxyiodobenzene was used as
oxidant. c 2-Iodoxybenzoic acid was used as oxidant. d FeCl3 was used as
an oxidant. e 10 equiv of olefin were used.
(8) Fukutani, T.; Hirano, K.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
5198.
(9) Thiem, J.; Meyer, B. Org. Magn. Reson. 1978, 11, 50.
(10) Mn(OAc)3 (1.5 mmol) and vinyldimethylphosphonate (3.0 mmol)
were added to a solution of the corresponding arylboronic acid (0.50 mmol)
in ClCH2CH2Cl (2.5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C under
an argon atmosphere for 6 h. The suspension was filtered through a pad of
celite, and the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue
was purified by FC (CH2Cl2/MeOH ) 40:1).
In other solvents (dichloromethane (DCM), R,R,R-trifluo-
rotoluene (TFT)) with Mn(OAc)3 or by using other oxidants
(6) Reviews on homolytic aromatic substitutions: (a) Studer, A.; Bossart,
M. In Radicals in Organic Synthesis, Vol. 2; Renaud, P., Sibi, M., Eds;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; p 62. (b) Studer, A.; Bossart, M. Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 9649. (c) Bowmann, W. R.; Storey, J. M. D. Chem. Soc. ReV.
2007, 36, 1803. (e) Vaillard, S. E.; Schulte, B.; Studer, A. In Modern
Arylation Methods; Ackermann, L., Ed; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2009; p
475.
(11) Oxidative formal hydroxyarylation of olefins; see: Kirchberg, S.;
Fro¨hlich, R.; Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4235
.
(12) Radical hydroxyalkylation; see: Ueda, M.; Miyabe, H.; Kimura,
T.; Kondoh, E.; Naito, T.; Miyata, O. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4632, and
references cited therein.
(13) Formal radical hydroxyarylation; see: Heinrich, M. R.; Wetzel, A.;
Kirschstein, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3833.
(7) Such a cascade, although in low yield, has been reported for the
decomposition of dibenzoylperoxide in the presence of an olefin; see:
Araneo, S.; Fontana, F.; Minisci, F.; Recupero, F.; Serri, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 36, 4307.
(14) For a highly efficient intermolecular aryl radical addition, see:
Vaillard, S. E.; Mu¨ck-Lichtenfeld, C.; Grimme, S.; Studer, A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6533.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 18, 2010
3973