3880
C. A. Zificsak et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 3877–3880
tolerated and no overt toxicity or body weight loss was observed.
The high plasma exposures observed in mouse raised expectations
for a sustained PD response leading to strong TGI. However, the ob-
served attenuated and fleeting PD response and modest TGI ap-
peared more consistent with tumor PK rather than plasma PK.
The low tumor concentrations of 11 (relative to its cellular ALK
IC50) resulted in only transient inhibition of ALK-phosphorylation
that proved insufficient to generate a more robust TGI response.
In conclusion, the incorporation of R,R-1,2-diaminocyclohexane
at C4 of the 2,4-diaminopyrimidine scaffold provided potent inhib-
itors of ALK in both enzyme and cellular assays. Capping of the
2-amino group with a methanesulfonamide provided the most ac-
tive analogs while maintaining selectivity over IR. Analog 11
showed bioavailability in mouse and demonstrated in vivo tumor
growth inhibition in a Karpas-299 tumor xenograft mouse model.
Figure 3. Inhibition of NPM–ALK phosphorylation in Karpas-299 tumor xenografts
in mice by 11 with a single oral dose.
Supplementary data
Plasma (ng/mL)
Tumor (ng/g)
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
10000
3685
2650
2740
References and notes
695
1000
100
602
279
1. (a) Palmer, R. H.; Vernersson, E.; Grabbe, C.; Hallberg, B. Biochem. J. 2009, 420,
345; (b) Webb, T. R.; Slavish, J.; George, R. E.; Look, A. T.; Xue, L.; Jiang, Q.;
Cui, X.; Rentrop, W. B.; Morris, S. W. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2009, 9, 331;
(c) Chiarle, R.; Voena, C.; Ambrogio, C.; Piva, R.; Inghirami, G. Nat. Rev. Cancer
2008, 8, 11; (d) Cheng, M.; Ott, G. R. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2010, 10,
236.
2. (a) Milkiewicz, K. L.; Ott, G. R. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2010, 20, 1653; (b) Grande,
E.; Bolós, M.-V.; Arriola, E. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2011, 10, 569.
2 h
6 h
12 h
and
Cmpd-11, 30 mg/kg, PO
4. Galkin, A. V.; Melnick, J. S.; Kim, S.; Hood, T. L.; Li, N.; Li, L.; Xia, G.; Steensma, R.;
Chopiuk, G.; Wan, Y.; Ding, P.; Liu, Y.; Sun, F.; Schultz, P. G.; Gray, N. S.;
Warmuth, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 270.
Figure 4. PK data for 11 from PK/PD study in mice with a single oral dose.
5. Ott, G. R.; Tripathy, R.; Cheng, M.; McHugh, R.; Anzalone, A. V.; Underiner, T. L.;
Curry, M. A.; Quail, M. R.; Lu, L.; Wan, W.; Angeles, T. S.; Albom, M. S.; Aimone,
L. D.; Ator, M. A.; Ruggeri, B. A.; Dorsey, B. D. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 493.
6. Full synthetic details may be found in the Supplementary data.
7. (a) Liu, T.-J.; LaFortune, T.; Honda, T.; Ohmori, O.; Hatakeyama, S.; Meyer, T.;
Jackson, D.; de Groot, J.; Yung, W. K. A. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 1357; (b)
Garcia-Echeverria, C.; Kanazawa, T.; Kawahara, E.; Masuya, K.; Matsuura, N.;
Miyake, T.; Ohmori, O.; Umemura, I.; Steensma, R.; Chopiuk, G.; Jiang, J.; Wan,
Y.; Ding, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Gray, N. S.; Karanewsky, D. PCT Int. Appl. WO
2005016894; Chem. Abstr. 2005, 142, 261547.
Karpas-299 Tumor Xenografts in Mice
8
Vehicle, PO, bid
30 mg/kg, PO, bid
6
55 mg/kg, PO, bid
#
8. For in vitro and in vivo assay conditions, see Ref. 5.
4
9. As a key regulator of glucose metabolism, selectivity against IR was desired. For
an account of a small molecule kinase inhibitor’s effect on glucose homeostasis,
see: Sabbatini, P.; Korenchuk, S.; Rowand, J. L.; Groy, A.; Liu, Q.; Leperi, D.;
Atkins, C.; Dumble, M.; Yang, J.; Anderson, K.; Kruger, R. G.; Gontarek, R. R.;
Maksimchuk, K. R.; Suravajjala, S.; Lapierre, R. R.; Shotwell, J. B.; Wilson, J. W.;
Chamberlain, S. D.; Rabindran, S. K.; Kumar, R. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 2811.
10. Mesaros, E. F.; Burke, J. P.; Parrish, J. D.; Dugan, B. J.; Anzalone, A. V.; Angeles, T.
S.; Albom, M. S.; Aimone, L. D.; Quail, M. R.; Wan, W.; Lu, L.; Huang, Z.; Ator, M.
A.; Ruggeri, B. A.; Cheng, M.; Ott, G. R.; Dorsey, B. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2011, 21, 463.
11. Zificsak, C. A.; Theroff, J. P.; Aimone, L. D.; Albom, M. S.; Angeles, T. S.; Brown,
R.; Galinis, D.; Grobelny, J. V.; Herbertz, T.; Husten, J.; Kocsis, L. S.; LoSardo, C.;
Miknyoczki, S. J.; Murthy, S.; Rolon-Steele, D.; Underiner, T. L.; Wells-Knecht, K.
J.; Worrell, C. S.; Zeigler, K.; Dorsey, B. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 660.
12. Compound 5b was treated with methyl or ethyl iodide and the product was
reacted with 7c to furnish 23 or 24.
#
#
2
0
#
#
*
#
0
3
6
9
12
Days in treatment
Initiation of cmpd-11 treatment
# P < 0.05
*
Figure 5. Effect of 11 on Karpas-299 xenograft tumors.
13. Fabian, M. A.; Biggs, W. H., III; Treiber, D. K.; Atteridge, C. R.; Azimioara, M. D.;
Benedetti, M. G.; Carter, T. A.; Ciceri, P.; Edeen, P. T.; Floyd, M.; Ford, J. M.;
Galvin, M.; Gerlach, J. L.; Grotzfeld, R. M.; Herrgard, S.; Insko, D. E.; Insko, M. A.;
Lai, A. G.; Lelias, J.-M.; Mehta, S. A.; Milanov, Z. V.; Velasco, A. M.; Wodicka, L.
M.; Patel, H. K.; Zarrinkar, P. P.; Lockhart, D. J. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 329.
14. A table of kinase targets and inhibition data is in the Supplementary data.
Analog 11 inhibited ALK, KIT(D816V) and PLK1; 23 inhibited ALK, CSF1R,
ERBB4, FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, FGFR4, FLT3, JNK1, JNK3, KIT, KIT(D816V),
KIT(V559D, T670I), LKB1, PDFGRB, PIM1 and PLK1.
significantly lower than the plasma levels at all three time points
(2, 6 and 12 h) (Fig. 4). Compound 11 was also evaluated for tumor
growth inhibition (TGI) in a 10 day Karpas-299 tumor xenograft
model at two doses (30 and 55 mg/kg, p.o., bid, Fig. 5). A shallow
dose response between the 30 and 55 mg/kg groups was observed
leading to 45% and 54% TGI, respectively. The compound was well