Paper
RSC Advances
and then by using an external magnet, nano walnut shell coated
over magnetic nanoparticles were separated. Then magnetic
precipitate rst was washed with distilled water then ethanol,
Conflicts of interest
There are no conicts to declare.
ꢀ
and nally dried at 80 C for 4 h. The nal weight of obtained
nano-Fe3O4@walnut shell is 1.5 g.
Acknowledgements
The Research Council of Yazd University gratefully acknowl-
edged for the nancial support for this work.
Preparation of nano-Fe3O4@walnut shell/Cu(II)
In a ask containing 50 mL of 0.5 M NaOH, nano-Fe3O4@-
walnut shell (0.5 g) was added with stirring. Then, 75 mL of
CuCl2 aqueous solution, 0.04 M, was added. A dark brown
solution was obtained immediately that was stirred at room
temperature. Aer 6 h, the magnetically heterogeneous catalyst,
nano-Fe3O4@walnut shell/Cu(II), removed from solution by an
external magnet. The catalyst washed with ethanol and water
Notes and references
1 (a) D. Klemm, B. Heublein, H. P. Fink and A. Bohn, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 3358–3393; (b) Y. Habibi,
L. A. Lucia and O. J. Rojas, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 3479–
3500; (c) R. J. Moon, A. Martini, J. Nairn, J. Simonsen and
J. Youngblood, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 3941–3994; (d)
S. Van de Vyver, J. Geboers, P. A. Jacobs and B. F. Sels,
ChemCatChem, 2011, 3, 82–94; (e) F. Rol, M. N. Belgacem,
A. Gandini and J. Bras, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2019, 88, 241–264.
2 (a) A. Shaabani and A. Maleki, Appl. Catal., A, 2007, 331, 149–
151; (b) H. P. S. Khalil, Y. Y. Tye, C. K. Saurabh, C. P. Leh,
T. K. Lai, E. W. N. Chong, M. R. Fazita, J. Mohd Haidz,
A. Banerjee and M. I. Syakir, eXPRESS Polym. Lett., 2017,
ꢀ
two times and dried at an oven at 80 C.
General procedure for synthesis of 2-aryl/alkyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-
naphtho[1,2-e][1,3]oxazine
A mixture of b-naphthol (1.0 mmol), primary amine (1.0 mmol)
and formaldehyde 37% (2.0 mmol/0.07 mL) and nano-Fe3-
O4@walnut shell/Cu(II) (0.08 g) was stirred at 60 ꢀC under
solvent-free condition. Aer completion of the reaction that
monitored by TLC, the reaction mixture was dissolved in hot
ethanol (3 mL) and the catalyst was separated by using an
external magnet. Then, cold water was added to residue and the
solid product was collected by ltration. Almost in all cases, the
products were pure and showed the expected analytical data.
The recovered catalyst was washed several times with ethanol,
dried, and reused for next runs.
´
11, 244–265; (c) V. P. Cyras, C. M. Soledad and V. Analıa,
Polym, 2009, 50, 6274–6280; (d) J. Credou and T. Berthelot,
J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, 2, 4767–4788; (e) G. Cipriani,
A. Salvini, P. Baglioni and E. Bucciarelli, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.,
´
2010, 118, 2939–2950; (f) I. Siro and D. Plackett, Cellulose,
2010, 17, 459–494.
3 Y. Lu, X. Lu, B. T. Mayers, T. Herricks and Y. Xia, J. Solid State
Chem., 2008, 181, 1530–1538.
4 H. F. Rase, Handbook of Commercial Catalysts: Heterogeneous
Catalysts, CRC Press, New York, 2000.
5 A. El Harrak, G. Carrot, J. Oberdisse, C. Eychenne-Baron and
Spectral data for selected compounds
´
2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-naphtho[1,2-e][1,3]oxa-
zine (Table 2, 4d). White solid, mp 100–103 C. FT-IR (ATR) ꢁn
F. Boue, Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 6376–6384.
ꢀ
6 P. Tartaj and C. J. Serna, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 15754–
15755.
7 S. Azad and B. F. Mirjalili, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 96928–96934.
8 Z. Zhang, H. Duan, S. Li and Y. Lin, Langmuir, 2010, 26,
6676–6680.
(cmꢁ1): 1593, 1492, 1225, 1092. 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz)/
d ppm: 7.84 (t, 2H, 3J ¼ 9.2 Hz, Ar–H), 7.71 (d, 1H, 3J ¼ 8.8 Hz,
Ar–H), 7.53 (t, 1H, 3J ¼ 7.2 Hz, Ar–H), 7.38 (t, 1H, 3J ¼ 7.6 Hz, Ar–
H), 7.24–7.29 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 7.02 (d, 1H, 3J ¼ 8.8 Hz, Ar–H), 5.51
(s, 2H, O–CH2–N), 5.03 (s, 2H, –Ar–CH2–N).
9 M. A. Zolgol, A. R. Moosavi-Zare, P. Moosavi, V. Khakyzadeh
and A. Zare, C. R. Chim., 2013, 16, 962–966.
2-Cyclohexyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-naphtho[1,2-e][1,3]oxazine
(Table 2, 4j). Off-white solid, mp 248 ꢀC (d). FT-IR (ATR) ꢁn 10 N. Safajoo, B. F. Mirjalili and A. Bamoniri, RSC Adv., 2019, 9,
(cmꢁ1): 2926, 2852, 1597, 1467, 1227, 1058. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
500 MHz)/d ppm: 7.66–7.81 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 7.48 (m, 1H, Ar–H), 11 K. S. Kumar, N. P. Kumar, B. Rajesham, G. Kishan, S. Akula
7.35 (m, 1H, Ar–H), 6.98 (m, 1H, Ar–H), 4.99 (s, 2H, O–CH2–N), and R. K. Kancha, New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 34–38.
4.33 (s, 2H, Ar–CH2–N), 2.70 (m, 1H, CH–N), 1.08–1.86 (m, 10H, 12 N. Latif, N. Mishriky and F. Massad, Aust. J. Chem., 1982, 35,
5CH2). 1037–1043.
2-Hexyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-naphtho[1,2-e][1,3]oxazine (Table 2, 13 J. B. Chylinska and T. Urbanski, J. Med. Chem., 1963, 6, 484–
4k). Brown solid, mp 177 ꢀC (d). FT-IR (ATR) ꢁn (cmꢁ1): 2927, 2854,
487.
1597, 1467, 1225, 1057. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz)/d ppm: 7.80 14 W. J. Weiner, S. A. Factor and J. R. Sanchez-Ramos, J. Neurol.,
(m, 1H, Ar–H), 7.68 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 7.47 (m, 1H, Ar–H), 7.34 (m, 1H, Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 1989, 52, 732–735.
Ar–H), 7.00 (m, 1H, Ar–H), 4.87 (s, 2H, O–CH2–N), 4.25 (s, 2H, –Ar– 15 S. A. Sadaphal, S. S. Sonar, B. B. Shingate and M. S. Shingare,
CH2–N), 2.68 (m, 2H, –CH2–N), 1.53 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.25 (m, 6H, Green Chem. Lett. Rev., 2010, 3, 213–216.
3CH2), 0.84 (m, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz)/d ppm: 16 A. H. Kategaonkar, S. S. Sonar, R. U. Pokalwar,
1278–1283.
14.77, 22.98, 27.23, 28.38, 32.02, 47.87, 52.09, 82.71, 112.97, 119.14,
122.18, 124.13, 127.32, 128.46, 129.21, 129.28, 132.44, 152.42.
A. H. Kategaonkar, B. B. Shingate and M. S. Shingare, Bull.
Korean Chem. Soc., 2010, 31, 1657–1660.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 31874–31880 | 31879