C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Copolymerization of Propylene Oxide with CO2 in the
Presence of Monomeric and Dimeric CrIII(salphen) Catalysts (60
°C, 40 bar CO2, 24 h)
The alkylation of 3 with excess of 1-bromohexane or with
0.5 equiv of R,ω-dibromoalkanes proceeds selectively at the
-OH group of the resorcin moiety. In the dimerization reactions,
which require a longer period of time for completion, partial
dehydrohalogenation of R,ω-dibromoalkanes and marginal hy-
drolysis of salphens lead to minor byproducts. Dimeric ligands
5a-c of good purity are readily obtained by reprecipitation from
acetonitrile due to a strong difference in solubility of bridged
and monomeric ligands in this solvent. Metalation of 5a-c with
CrCl2 according to a modified literature procedure gives the
corresponding CrIII complexes 6a-c in quantitative yields.12
These complexes were first tested for their catalytic performance
in the synthesis of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) via ROP of ꢀ-BL
(Scheme 1). Since the substitution pattern of the salphen ligand
plays a crucial role in the activity of the catalyst and changes the
characteristics of produced polymer,13a an analogous monomeric
Cr(III) complex, 4b, was synthesized for comparison. This high-
lighted the dimerization effect in the obtained polymerization results
(Table 1).
d
entry
cat.
[PO]/[Cr]a
PO/CO2b
cPC, %c
TOF, h-1
Mw, kg/mol
PD
8
9
10
11
4b
6c
4b
6c
2000
2000
20000
20000
1.7
2.3
1.3
2.4
<1
0
20
<2
67
49
7
70
40
9
2.0
1.8
2.0
3.3
82
46
a Molar ratio of propylene oxide to chromium. b Molar ratio of
propylene oxide to CO2 in the polymer (see Supporting Information for
details). c Weight part of cyclic propylene carbonate. d Turnover
frequency calculated for consumption of PO per Cr center; molar
TOFs for dimeric catalysts are twice higher.
and 9), though there is a drastic influence of dilution on the
polymerization results. The monomeric complex 4b loses its activity
in terms of much lower TOF and polymer molecular weight (entry
10), whereas in the case of catalysis with dimeric complex 6c, these
characteristics remain practically unaffected (entry 11). This is
consistent with our previous considerations on the mechanism of
the CO2/PO copolymerization.5e Additionally, the formation of
cyclic propylene carbonate (cPC) becomes noticeable only for
monomeric complex upon dilution (entry 10), which can be
attributed to an enhanced dissociation of the coordinated polymer
chain end from the catalyst, followed by back-biting.5e Investigation
of polymerization using dimeric catalysts or 4b in the presence of
cocatalysts is in progress.
In conclusion, a reliable and versatile synthetic approach toward
dinuclear salphen systems was developed. Using the corresponding
Cr(III) complexes, an increased activity upon dimerization was
demonstrated for such actually important reactions as polymeriza-
tion of ꢀ-butyrolactone and copolymerization of CO2 with PO,
which underlines the role of bimetallic processes in mechanisms
of both reactions.
Table 1. Results of Polymerization (100 °C, 1:1000 Cr/ꢀ-BL Ratio)
of ꢀ-BL with Different Complexes
b
entry cat. polymerization time, h yield of PHB, %a TOF, h-1
Mw, kg/mol PD
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
4b
4b
6a
6a
6a
6b
6c
5
24
5
15
24
5
6
30
35
86
>99
28
12
12
70
57
41
56
62
20
25
71
107
108
68
2.0
2.6
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.2
2.1
5
31
70
a Determined by integration of signals in 1H NMR spectrum.
b Turnover frequency calculated per Cr center; molar TOFs for dimeric
catalysts are twice higher.
The developed synthetic strategy can be easily adjusted for the
preparation of heteronuclear complexes and other multifunctional
systems, opening a wide area for different applications. This issue
is currently under investigation in our group.
Indeed, despite the slightly reduced activities of these new
complexes and the lower Mw of the resulting polymers as
compared to the best CrIII(salphen)-based catalysts published
earlier,6a the effect of dimerization on ROP of ꢀ-BL in the
systems studied herein is clear. The productivity of dimeric
complexes is practically independent of the length of the spacer
(entries 3, 6, and 7), giving ca. 5 times higher yield and higher
molecular weight of PHB in comparison with the monomeric
complex (entry 1).
Supporting Information Available: Detailed description of syn-
thesis and characterization of new products and polymers. This material
References
On the other side, polymerization with the complexes studied
herein leads to PHB of a relatively narrow polydispersity (PD) close
to 2, whereas PHBs of similar molecular weight obtained previously
with monomeric CrIII(salphens) display PD in the range of 4-8
and even higher (see also Figure S12 in Supporting Information).6a,13a
In addition, in 13C NMR spectra of PHBs prepared here, the ratio
of i- to s-signals in the carbonyl region, being a measure of the
polymer tacticity,13b is below 1.2. This is much lower than in the
case of the previously reported CrIII(salphen) catalysts, where it
reaches nearly 2.6a Investigations to get reasonable experimentally
supported explanations of these facts are in progress in our
laboratory.
Bifunctional salen catalysts were described recently for the
copolymerization of CO2 and PO to give aliphatic polycarbonate
(PPC) (Scheme 1).14 The similarity of the latter reaction to ROP
of ꢀ-BL, as well as a high value of PPC for applications and
utilization of carbon dioxide, encouraged us to examine the dimeric
and monomeric Cr(III) complexes 6c and 4b for their activity in
such a copolymerization.
(1) Gupta, K. C.; Sutar, A. K. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2008, 252, 1420–1450.
(2) (a) McGarrigle, E. M.; Gilheany, D. G. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 1563–1602.
(b) Gupta, K. C.; Sutar, A. K.; Lin, C. C. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2009, 253,
1926–1946.
(3) (a) Pellissier, H. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2839–2877. (b) Cort, A. D.;
Mandolini, L.; Schiaffino, L. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3867–3869. (c)
Castelli, V. A.; Cort, A. D.; Mandolini, L.; Pinto, V.; Schiaffino, L. J.
Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5383–5386. (d) Madhavan, N.; Weck, M. AdV. Synth.
Catal. 2008, 350, 419–425.
(4) Achard, T. R. J.; Clutterbuck, L. A.; North, M. Synlett 2005, 1828–1847.
(5) (a) Darensbourg, D. J.; Mackiewicz, R. M.; Phelps, A. L.; Billodeaux, D. R.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 836–844. (b) Darensbourg, D. J. Chem. ReV.
2007, 107, 2388–2410. (c) Coates, G. W.; Moore, D. R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6618–6639. (d) Jacobsen, E. N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000,
33, 421–431. (e) Luinstra, G. A.; Haas, G. R.; Molnar, F.; Bernhart, V.;
Eberhardt, R.; Rieger, B. Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11, 6298–6314.
(6) (a) Zintl, M.; Molnar, F.; Urban, T.; Bernhart, V.; Preishuber-Pfluegl, P.;
Rieger, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3458–3460. (b) Dove, A. P.
Chem. Commun. 2008, 6446–6470.
(7) (a) Shibasaki, M.; Kanai, M.; Matsunaga, S.; Kumagai, N. Acc. Chem. Res.
2009, 42, 1117–1127. (b) Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 2008, 81, 60–75. (c) Haak, R. M.; Wezenberg, S. J.; Kleij, A. W.
Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2713–2723.
(8) (a) Konsler, R. G.; Karl, J.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
10780–10781. (b) Widger, P. C. B.; Ahmed, S. M.; Hirahata, W.; Thomas,
R. M.; Lobkovsky, E. B.; Coates, G. W. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2935–
2937. (c) Dioos, B. M. L.; Jacobs, P. A. Appl. Catal. A: General 2005,
282, 181–188. (d) Wezenberg, S. J.; Kleij, A. W. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2010,
352, 85–91. (e) Kleij, A. W. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 193–205.
As seen from Table 2, the activity of monomeric and dimeric
catalysts is comparable at a catalyst/PO ratio of 1/2000 (entries 8
9
14368 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 41, 2010