oxidation using Dess-Martin reagent, and Wittig olefination
afforded the terminal olefin 4 in 60% yields over three steps.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of 5
Scheme 4. Synthesis of 7
deprotected and subjected to oxidation with Dess-Martin
reagent, followed by Wittig olefination, leading to the
terminal olefin 5 in 64% yield over three steps (Scheme 5).
Ensuing cross-metathesis of the two fragments 4 and 5
catalyzed by second-generation Hoveyda-Grubbs catalyst,
hydrogenation over Pd/C, selective deprotection of TES, and
Dess-Martin oxidation, 26 was obtained in 40% yield over
four steps (Scheme 6). Finally, TBDPS deprotection using
TBAF yields the desired (3R,7R,11R,15R)-hormone R1 (1)
in 90% yield.14
As shown in Scheme 4, our synthesis of the fragment 7
utilizes an L-proline-catalyzed aldol reaction of commercially
available 17 and 18 to give anti-diol 19 with very high
enantioselectivity and moderate yield.11 After protection of
diol, tertiary 21 was obtained with 82% de by the reaction
of ketone 20 with vinyl magnesium bromide.12 After Bn
protection, acetal deprotection, periodate cleavage, NaBH4
reduction, and subsequent submittal to benzyl protection
reaction, 24 was formed (68%, from 21). The desired
precursor 7 was obtained in 79% yield by deprotection of
24 using DDQ.12
Scheme 6. Total Synthesis of 1
The synthesis of precursor 8, as shown in Scheme 5, was
achieved from 11 by Dess-Martin oxidation followed by
Wittig olefination in 72% yield. By means of cross metathesis
between 7and 8 using second-generation Hoveyda-Grubbs-2
catalyst,9d 23 was generated predominately in the (E)-
configuration in 62% yield as shown in Scheme 5.13
Hydrogenation of (E)-olefin 25 over Pd/C catalyst afforded
the corresponding primary alcohol, which was then protected
with TBDPS to give 24. Next, the Bz group was selectively
(8) (a) Wang, S.-Y.; Lum, T.-K.; Ji, S.-J.; Loh, T.-P. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2008, 350, 673–677. (b) Lum, T.-K.; Wang, S.-Y.; Loh, T.-P. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 761–764.
(9) (a) Garber, S. B.; Kingsbury, J. S.; Gray, B. L.; Hoveyda, A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8168–8179. (b) Hoye, T. R.; Zhao, H. Org.
Lett. 1999, 1, 1123–1125. (c) Chatterjee, A. K.; Choi, T.-L.; Sanders, D. P.;
Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11360–11370. (d) Kanada,
R. M.; Itoh, D.; Nagai, M.; Niijima, J.; Asai, N.; Mizui, Y.; Abe, S.; Kotake,
Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4350–4355.
(10) Notz, W.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7386–7387.
(11) (a) Wang, S.-Y.; Chin, Y.-J.; Loh, T.-P. Synthesis 2009, 3557–
3564. (b) Chin, Y.-J.; Wang, S.-Y.; Loh, T.-P. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3674–
3676.
(12) See Supporting Information. The absolute stereochemistry of 21
was determined by comparison with our previous results (ref 11).
5168
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 22, 2010