2320
M. Osaka et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 21 (2010) 2319–2320
conjugate addition5 of a methyl group onto 6 with a chiral auxiliary
providing 5 and the latter by an asymmetric dihydroxylation of the
corresponding trisubstituted alkene, which would be derived from
4, respectively. The unsaturated enone 6 can be prepared by the
Heck reaction of the arylbromide 76 and the (R)-3-acryloyl-4-
phenyloxazolidin-2-one 87 (Scheme 1).
of the secondary alcohol moiety provided the mesylate 3, which was
treated with K2CO3 in methanol at room temperature to give the
oxepane 29 in 58% yield after purification by silica gel column
chromatography.10 Presumably this was generated by a sequential
epoxidation, desilylation, and [7-exo-trig] mode of nucleophilic
epoxide opening with a phenoxide anion as expected. Finally, com-
pound 2 was exposed to acidic conditions to produce heliannuol D
(1) in 81% yield. The spectroscopic properties as well as the specific
The substrate 6 for the key diastereoselective conjugate addition
was synthesized in 81% yield by the Heck reaction of the arylbromide
7 and the enone 8 with catalytic Pd(OAc)2 and (o-Tol)3P in the pres-
ence of Et3N. Treatment of a solution of 6 in THF with MeMgBr and
CuBrꢁSMe2 at ꢀ20 °C produced the methylated product 5 as an
inseparable mixture of diastereoisomers (12:1 from 1H NMR in
C6D6), which was recrystallized immediately from AcOEt and n-
hexane to give diastereomerically pure 5 in 71% yield. After hydro-
lytic removal of the chiral auxiliary, the resulting carboxylic acid 9
was treated with BBr3 in CH2Cl2 at room temperature to give the lac-
tone 4, which without purification was converted to the MOM ether
10 in 92% yieldin twosteps. Thus we could discriminatebetween the
two phenolic hydroxy groups. A DIBAH reduction followed by Wittig
reaction provided the methyl enol ether 11, which was subjected
sequentially to acidic hydrolysis and Wittig reaction to give the phe-
nol 12 in 54% yield from 10. After protection of the hydroxyl function
in 12 as the TBS ether, the resulting 13 was subjected to an asymmet-
ric dihydroxylation reaction employing AD-mix-b and CH3SO2NH2
to give diol 14 in 94% yield as a single product.8 Selective mesylation
rotation ½fa 2D8
ꢂ
¼ þ18 (c 1.01, CHCl3); lit.1 ½a D26
¼ þ16 (c 0.1, CHCl3)}
ꢂ
of the synthetic heliannuol D were identical with those of the natural
product (Scheme 2).
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have completed a concise enantioselective
total synthesis of heliannuol D in 14 steps and in 12% overall
yield,11 which has enabled us to obtain not only the natural prod-
uct but also the related compounds for various biological evalua-
tions. The key steps include a diastereoselective construction of a
tertiary benzylic stereogenic center (C7) employing a conjugate
addition of a methyl group onto the enone system with a chiral
auxiliary and a simple assembly of the functionalized oxepane
framework by an efficient one-pot transformation procedure. The
synthetic route developed herein is general and efficient and
would be applicable to other related natural products.
Acknowledgments
MeO
Me
CO2H
OMe
c
d
a
b
This work was supported financially by a Grant-in-Aid for the
Program for Promotion of Basic and Applied Research for Innova-
tions in the Bio-oriented Industry (BRAIN).
5
+
7
8
6
OMe
9
References
RO
Me
MOMO
Me
f, g
h, i
1. Macías, F. A.; Molinillo, J. M.; Varela, R. M.; Torres, A.; Fronczek, F. R. J. Org.
Chem. 1994, 59, 8261; Goering, B. K. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University,
1995.
2. (a) Takabatake, K.; Nishi, I.; Shindo, M.; Shishido, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
2000, 1807; (b) Kishuku, H.; Yoshimura, T.; Kakehashi, T.; Shindo, M.; Shishido,
K. Heterocycles 2003, 61, 125; (c) Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, W.; Quan, W.; She,
X.; Pan, X. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 6990.
O
O
OH
4: R=H
11
e
10: R=MOM
3. (a) Vyvyan, J. R.; Looper, R. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1151; (b) Tuhina, K.;
Bhowmik, D. R.; Venkateswaran, R. V. Chem. Commun. 2002, 634; (c) Macías, F.
A.; Chinchilla, D.; Molinillo, J. M. G.; Marin, D.; Varela, R. M.; Torres, A.
Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 1679; (d) Doi, F.; Ohara, T.; Ogamino, T.; Sugai, T.;
Higashinakasu, K.; Yamada, K.; Shigemori, H.; Hasegawa, K.; Nishiyama, S.
Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 1405; (e) Sabui, S. K.; Venkateswaran, R. V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 983; (f) Sabui, S. K.; Venkateswaran, R. V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2047; (g) Osaka, M.; Kanematsu, M.; Yoshida, M.;
Shishido, K. Heterocycles 2010, 80, 1003.
MOMO
Me
MOMO
k
OH
OR
OTBS
Me
j
OR
12: R=H
14: R=H
3: R=Ms
l
13: R=TBS
4. Kishuku, H.; Shindo, M.; Shishido, K. Chem. Commun. 2003, 350.
5. Qian, X.; Russell, K. C.; Boteju, L. W.; Hruby, V. J. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 1033.
6. Yoshida, M.; Shoji, Y.; Shishido, K. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1441.
MOMO
Me
m
n
1
7. Kise, N.; Mimura, R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 988.
8. The absolute configuration of
a newly generated stereogenic center was
O
determined by the Kusumi–Mosher method. The stereochemical homogeneity
of 14 was confirmed by the 1H NMR of the MTPA ester and the 13C NMR.
9. Since the 10-epi-isomer of 2 was not involved in the crude product, the reaction
proceeded via epoxide intermediate.
2
OH
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) Pd(OAc)2, (o-Tol)3P, Et3N, rt, 81%; (b)
MeMgBr, CuBrꢁSMe2, THF, ꢀ20 °C, then recrystallization from AcOEt/hexane, 71%;
10. Under the reaction conditions used, the eight-membered cyclized product2a
was not obtained at all.
i
(c) 30% H2O2 (aq), LiOHꢁH2O, 97%; (d) BBr3, CH2Cl2, rt; (e) MOMCl, Pr2NEt, CH2Cl2,
60 °C, 92% (two steps); (f) DIBAH, CH2Cl2, ꢀ78 °C; (g) (Ph3P+CH2OCH3)Clꢀ, NaHMDS,
THF, rt, 81% (two steps); (h) 2 N HCl, acetone, 0 °C; (i) [Ph3P+CH(CH3)2]Iꢀ, tBuOK,
THF, rt, 67% (two steps); (j) TBSCl, imidazole, 4-DMAP, CH2Cl2, rt, quant.; (k) AD-
mix-b, CH3SO2NH2, tBuOH/H2O, rt, 94%; (l) MsCl, pyridine, 4-DMAP, CH2Cl2, rt; (m)
K2CO3, MeOH, rt, 58% (two steps); (n) 6 N HCl, THF, rt, 81%.
11. Comparison of the overall yield and steps for the previous enantioselective total
syntheses:for Ref.2a, 3.8%for 20 steps from4-methyl-2,5-dimethoxyiodobenzene;
for Ref.2b, 2.8% for 15 steps from 4-methyl-3-methoxyiodobenzene; for Ref.2c, 9.4%
for 15 steps from 1,4-dimethoxy-2-methyl-5-(prop-1-en-2-yl)benzene, the
preparation and yield of which have not been mentioned in the literature.