A Two-Step Synthesis of Unsymmetrical 1,4-Disubstituted Carbazoles
tained after removal of the solvent at reduced pressure was
conditions so that different promoters have been
tested to efficiently obtain conversion of compounds
10 into carbazoles 11. Solid acid systems are known to
be efficient promoters in many synthetic processes in-
cluding cleavage of various carbonyl protecting
groups.[17] Furthermore, working under heterogeneous
conditions allows an easy recovery of the solid acid
and a considerable speeding up in the subsequent
work-up operations. The best conditions for this pro-
cess have been found in the utilization of Amberlyst
15 as proton source in isopropyl alcohol at reflux as
evidenced by the satisfactory results displayed in
Table 1. Although the intermediate adducts 10 can be
isolated, we have observed that crude products 10,
obtained by simple filtration of the solid basic pro-
moter and solvent evaporation, are suitable for the
next cyclization step. This simplified procedure has a
beneficial effect on the overall waste reduction and
allows us to record a better chemical yield over the
two-step process involving purification of intermedi-
ate compounds 10 (Table 1, compare entries 3/4, 5/6,
8/9, 10/11, 13/14). In a couple of examples we changed
the nature of the acetal protection from 1,3-dioxolan-
yl to 5,5-dimethyl-1,3-dioxanyl without evidencing
any substantial advantage (Table 1, entries 13, 14, 16).
In summary, unsymmetrical 1,4-disubstituted carba-
zoles can be easily prepared by a two-step procedure
starting from sulfonylindoles. The first reaction con-
sists in the nucleophilic addition of acetal protected
b-nitro ketones to alkylideneindolenine intermediates
generated from sulfonylindoles under basic condi-
tions. The following transformation includes three
consecutive synthetic operations involving acetal
cleavage, Friedel–Crafts cyclization and final aromati-
zation by elimination of nitrous acid. Every single
step is carried out under heterogeneous conditions so
that work-up operations are minimized and isolation
is required only to obtain the target carbazole.
purified by flash chromatography (hexanes/toluene 90:10).
4-Methyl-1-phenethyl-9H-carbazole (11b): Yield: 54%;
yellow solid, mp 116–1198C. IR (nujol): n=1250, 1588,
3030, 3420 cmÀ1 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): d=2.88 (s,
;
3H), 3.08 (t, 2H, J=6.8 Hz), 3.21 (t, 2H, J=6.8 Hz), 6.98
(d, 1H, J=7.3 Hz), 7.16 (d, 1H, J=7.3 Hz), 7.20–7.34 (m,
6H), 7.38–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.83 (bs, 1H), 8.18 (d, 1H, J=
7.7 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): d=20.7, 33.6, 36.4,
110.6, 119.3, 121.0, 121.3, 122.6, 124.4, 125.1, 125.4, 126.3,
126.6, 127.7, 128.7, 131.3, 138.6, 139.7, 142.1; GC-MS
(70 eV): m/z=285 ([M+], 40), 195 (26), 194 (100), 167 (6),
91 (8), 65 (3); anal. calcd. for C21H19N (285.38): C 88.38, H
6.71, N 4.91; found: C 88.50, H 6.78 N, 4.98.
4-Cyclohexyl-1-ethyl-9H-carbazole (11f): Yield: 65%
(from pure 10f), 62% (from crude 10f); white solid, mp 71–
738C. IR (nujol): n=1228, 1580, 1619, 3055, 3409 cmÀ1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): d=1.34–1.47 (m, 1H), 1.42 (t,
3H, J=7.7 Hz), 1.54–1.72 (m, 4H), 1.84–1.93 (m, 1H), 1.95–
2.03 (m, 2H), 2.16–2.26 (m, 2H), 2.92 (q, 2H, J=7.7 Hz),
3.46–3.56 (m, 1H), 7.10 (d, 1H, J=7.7 Hz), 7.23–7.30 (m,
2H), 7.39–7.45 (m, 1H), 7.49 (dt, 1H, J=0.9, 8.1 Hz), 8.06
(bs, 1H), 8.13 (d, 1H, J=7.7 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3,
100 MHz): d=13.9, 24.1, 26.8, 27.5, 33.4, 41.0, 110.7, 116.0,
119.6, 120.6, 123.0, 123.3, 123.8, 124.6, 125.1, 138.4, 139.6,
141.5; GC-MS (70 eV): m/z=277 ([M+], 100), 262 (11), 248
(10), 234 (14), 208 (30), 206 (24), 205 (28), 204 (31), 191
(23), 180 (36); anal. calcd. for C20H23N (277.40): C 86.59, H
8.36, N 5.05; found: C 86.21, H 8.45, N 5.02.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the University of Camerino and Ital-
ian MIUR (National Project “Sintesi organiche ecosostenibili
mediate da nuovi sistemi catalitici) is gratefully acknowl-
edged.
References
[1] Reviews: a) H.-J. Knçlker, Chem. Lett. 2009, 38, 8–13;
b) T. A. Choi, R. Czerwonka, R. Forke, A. Jꢅger, J.
Knçll, M. P. Krahl, T. Krause, K. R. Reddy, S. G. Franz-
blau, H.-J. Knçlker, Med. Chem. Res. 2008, 17, 374–
385; c) H.-J. Knçlker, K. R. Reddy, Chemistry and Biol-
ogy of Carbazole Alkaloids, inꢂ: The Alkaloids, (Ed.:
G. A. Cordell), Academic Press, Amsterdam, Vol. 65,
2008, pp 1–430; d) H.-J. Knçlker, K. R. Reddy, Chem.
Rev. 2002, 102, 4303–4427.
[2] Review a) P. T. Boudreault, N. Blouin, M. Leclerc, Adv.
Polym. Sci. 2008, 212, 99–124. For other recent papers,
see: b) T. Hiejima, Y. Takamizawa, Y. Tanaka, K.
Ueda, T. Uchida, J. Polym. Sci. B: 2010, 48, 496–502;
c) N. Berton, I. Fabre-Francke, D. Bourrat, F. Chande-
zon, S. Sadki, J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 14087–
14093; d) R. Qin, W. Li, C. Li, C. Du, C. Veit, H.-F.
Schleiermacher, M. Andersson, Z. Bo, Z. Liu, O. Inga-
nas, U. Wuerfel, F. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
14612–14613; e) D. Bellows, E. Gingras, S. M. Aly,
Experimental Section
General Procedure for the Preparation of Carbazoles
11
To a stirred solution of sulfonylindole 6 (1.0 mmol) and ni-
troalkane 9 (1.0 mmol) in dichloromethane (4 mL), potassi-
um fluoride on basic alumina (2.0 g) was added at room
temperature. After stirring for the appropriate time (see
Table 1), the mixture was filtered over a short pad of celite
and washed with EtOAc (15 mL). Removal of the solvent at
reduced pressure, gave crude nitroalkyl indole 10 that was
dissolved in i-PrOH (4 mL) and heated at reflux. To the
boiling mixture Amberlyst 15 (1 g), was then added and
heating was continued for the appropriate time (see
Table 1). After cooling, the solid promoter was filtered off
and washed with EtOAc (3ꢄ8 mL). The crude product ob-
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2459 – 2462
ꢃ 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2461