23R configuration in 88% yield (8:1 dr).19 The minor 23S
diastereomer proved readily separable by column chroma-
tography, and Mitsunobu inversion of the C23-hydroxyl in
24,20 followed by base-mediated methanolysis/desilylation
(K2CO3, MeOH), gave 25 (64%) with the requisite 23S
configuration. TBS protection (TBSCl/ImH, 91%) then
completed the C21-C34 subunit 5 in six steps and 11%
overall yield.
Scheme 4.
Synthesis of C21-C34 Subunit 5a
With our key subunits in hand our attention turned to the
C20-C21 bond construction and the installation of the
central C20-C23 syn-substituted THF motif. In practice,
treatment of 5 with n-BuLi, followed by addition of the
resulting lithium anion to 4, gave the expected Felkin-Anh
adduct 26 in 71% yield with good levels of stereocontrol at
C20 (3:1 dr). Diimide reduction of 26 with TsNHNH2 and
NaOAc in DME at reflux proved the most efficient reduction
protocol to afford 27 in 79% yield.21 At this point the C20
diastereomers were readily separated by column chroma-
tography.19 The stage was now set for the construction of
the central C20-C23 THF ring. In the event the C20-
hydroxyl in 27 was readily activated as its mesylate (MsCl,
Et3N), which upon treatment with TBAF promoted silyl ether
cleavage and concomitant 5-exo ring closure to provide 3
a Ar ) 4-BrC6H4.
protocols developed by Forsyth and co-workers.14,15 Cleav-
age of the TBS ethers in 16 with TBAF gave diol 17, which
was cleanly converted to epoxide 18 by treatment with NaH
and TrisIm (98%).14 Subsequent asymmetric dihydroxylation
of 18 (AD-mix-ꢀ),16 followed by base-mediated 5-exo
cyclization (K2CO3, MeOH), provided the 2,5-anti-THF diol
19 in 89% yield with >97:3 dr.15 A three-step sequence was
then required to complete the C9-C20 aldehyde 4, involving
TBS ether formation (TBSOTf, 2,6-lutidine), selective
primary silyl cleavage, and Dess-Martin oxidation (41%
over three steps). Using this approach the C9-C20 subunit
was completed in ten steps and 21% overall yield from 10.
As outlined in Scheme 4, the synthesis of the C21-C34
subunit 5 began with the opening of (S)-1-epoxyoctane 2017
with homoallylmagnesium bromide18 and catalytic CuI to
afford 21. In light of the initial uncertainty around the
substitution of the C24-C28 THP ring system in 1,1 we
adopted a divergent approach to access both syn-22 and anti-
23 from 21. Thus, epoxidation of 21 with mCPBA, followed
by addition of catalytic CSA (20 mol %) cleanly promoted
the in situ 6-exo cyclization to provide readily separable THP
alcohols 22 (41%) and 23 (32%). Oxidation of 22 and
addition of the lithium anion of trimethylsilylacetylene to
the intermediate aldehyde provided 24 with the undesired
1
in excellent yield. At this point, comparison of the H and
13C NMR spectra of the advanced C9-C34 intermediate 3
with the reported data for the C15-C28 region of chamu-
varinin showed them to be essentially in complete agree-
ment,1,2 providing us with the first clear indication of the
correct stereochemical assignment of the relative configu-
ration of the C15-C28 region of chamuvarinin.
With the advanced intermediate 3 in hand, attachment of
a suitable C1-C8 subunit at C9 was required to facilitate
the completion of chamuvarinin. In considering a suitable
C8-C9 coupling reaction, we initially focused on using a
C9-C34 aldehyde for olefination with either a C1-C8
Wittig salt or sulfone derived from 9; however this approach
proved unsuccessful. As a result we employed the reversed
coupling strategy detailed in Scheme 5. Thus, the C15-OH
in 3 was readily protected as its TBS ether (TBSOTf, 2,6-
lutidine, 88%) and subsequent hydrogenolysis of 28 provided
alcohol 29 in excellent yield. Treatment of 29 with 1H-
mercaptophenyltetrazole under Mitsunobu conditions (99%)
and subsequent oxidation of the intermediate sulfide (H2O2,
cat Mo(VI), 77%) provided the corresponding sulfone 30,
in readiness for the final C8-C9 Julia-Kocienski olefina-
tion.11,12,22 In the event, treatment of sulfone 30 with
(14) (a) Cink, R. D.; Forsyth, C. J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 8122. (b)
Corey, E. J.; Weigel, L. O.; Chamberlin, A. R.; Lipshutz, B. J. Am. Chem.
(19) The configurations of the carbinol stereocenters at C23 in 24 and
at C20 in 27 were assigned by advanced Mosher ester analysis. (a) Ohtani,
I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
4092. (b) Kusumi, T.; Hamada, T.; Ishitsuka, M. O.; Ohtani, I.; Kakisawa,
H. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1033. (c) Sullivan, J. R.; Dale, J. A.; Mosher,
H. S. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 2143. (d) Hoye, T. R.; Jeffrey, C. S.; Shao,
F. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2451.
Soc. 1980, 102, 1439
.
(15) (a) Dounay, A. B.; Florence, G. J.; Saito, A.; Forsyth, C. J.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 1865. (b) Dounay, A. B.; Forsyth, C. J. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 975
.
(16) Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. ReV.
1994, 94, 2483.
(20) For a review of the Mitsunobu reaction, see: Swamy, K. C. K.;
Kumar, N. N. B.; Balaraman, E.; Kumar, K. V. P. P. Chem. ReV. 2009,
109, 2551.
(17) Enantioenriched (S)-1-epoxyoctane 20 was prepared by hydrolytic
kinetic resolution of (()-epoxyoctane in 41% yield with g95% ee; see: (a)
Paddon-Jones, G. C.; McErlean, C. S. P.; Hayes, P.; Moore, C. J.; Konig,
W. A.; Kitching, W. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7487. (b) Schaus, S. E.;
Brandes, A. D.; Larrow, J. F.; Tokunga, M.; Hansen, K. B.; Gould, A. E.;
Furrow, M. E.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1307.
(18) Franc¸ais, A.; Bedel, O.; Picoul, W.; Meddour, A.; Courtien, J.;
Haudrechy, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1141.
(21) (a) Marshall, J. A.; Chen, M. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5996. (b)
Crimmins, M. T.; Zhang, Y.; Diaz, F. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2369.
(22) (a) Wilcox, C. S.; Gudipati, V.; Lu, H.; Turkyilmaz, S.; Curran,
D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6938. (b) Curran, D. P.; Zhang, Q.;
Richard, C.; Lu, H.; Gudipati, V.; Wilcox, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 9561
.
516
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 3, 2011