M. Yamaji et al. / Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 209 (2010) 153–157
157
4. Conclusion
Photochemical and photophysical features of PrAB in solution
were studied by steady-state and laser flash photolysis. From the
maximum wavelength of the absorption spectrum of PrAB, it was
inferred that PrAB in the ground state is in a keto form. Based on the
phosphorescence spectrum of PrAB, the triplet energy was deter-
mined to be 70.7 kcal mol−1. Steady-state and laser flash photolyses
of PrAB revealed that triplet PrAB undergoes the Norrish Type II
reaction, forming AB with a quantum yield of 0.23 in degassed
ACN. Occurrence of H-atom abstraction of triplet PrAB indicates
*
that the electronic character of the T1 state is of n, The acti-
vation energy and the frequency factor for photoelimination of
triplet PrAB were, respectively, determined to be 6.0 kcal mol−1 and
4.6 × 1010 s−1 by the Arrhenius-type analysis of decay kinetics of
triplet PrAB. These thermodynamic parameters indicate that the
photoelimination reaction of triplet PrAB is an adiabatic process.
Fig. 5. Arrhenius plots of kd for the decay of triplet PrAB in ACN.
An absorption spectrum of the corresponding triplet biradical
was not seen in the transient absorption spectrum change from
triplet PrAB to AB, indicating that the lifetime of the biradical is very
short compared to that of triplet PrAB, presumably, due to a large
rate of the successive -bond cleavage of the C–C bond. Therefore,
the determined rate, keli may be responsible for the intramolecu-
References
[1] D. Veierov, T. Bercovici, E. Fischer, Y. Mazur, A. Yogev, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99
(1977) 2723.
[2] A.J. Vila, C.M. Lagier, A.C. Olivieri, J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 5069.
[3] E.D. Raczynska, W. Kosinska, B. Osmialowski, R. Gawinecki, Chem. Rev. 105
(2005) 3561.
[4] P. Gacoin, J. Chem. Phys. 57 (1972) 1418.
lar H-atom abstraction of triplet PrAB. The residual quantum yield,
[5] P. Yankov, S. Saltiel, I. Petkov, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 41 (1988) 205.
[6] S. Tobita, J. Ohba, K. Nakagawa, H. Shizuka, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.
92 (1995) 61.
[7] B.K.V. Hansen, M. Winther, J. Spanget-Larsen, J. Mol. Struct. 790 (2006) 74.
[8] A. Aspée, C. Aliaga, J.C. Scaiano, Photochem. Photobiol. 83 (2007) 481.
[9] H. Gonzenbach, T.J. Hill, T.G. Truscott, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 16 (1992)
377.
deg
AB
1 − ˚
(0.77) and the rate, kd − keli (1.2 × 106 s−1) are of the inter-
system crossing from the T1 state to the ground state of PrAB in ACN
at 295 K.
3.3. Temperature dependence of photoelimimation of PrAB
[10] N.M. Roscher, M.K.O. Lindemann, S. Bin Kong, C.G. Cho, P. Jiang, J. Photochem.
Photobiol. A: Chem. 80 (1994) 417.
Temperature dependence of the decay rate, kd of triplet PrAB
was elucidated in the temperature range from 240 to 295 K. Fig. 5
shows Arrhenius plots of kd in ACN. The plots show a straight line,
indicating that the decay rate, kd is expressed by the Arrhenius
expression with the apparent activation energy, ꢁEa and the fre-
quency factor, A.
[11] W. Schwack, T. Rudolph, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 28 (1995) 229.
[12] I. Andrae, A. Bringhen, F. Böhm, H. Gonzenbach, T. Hill, L. Mulroy, T.G. Truscott,
J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 37 (1997) 147.
[13] M. Dubois, P. Gilard, P. Tiercet, A. Deflandre, M.A. Lefebvre, J. Chim. Phys. 95
(1998) 388.
[14] F.P. Gasparro, M. Mitchnick, J.F. Nash, Photochem. Photobiol. 68 (1998) 243.
[15] A. Cantrell, D.J. McGarvey, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 64 (2001) 117.
[16] C. Eric, G. Bernard, Photochem. Photobiol. 74 (2001) 401.
[17] F. Wetz, C. Routaboul, D. Lavabre, J.-C. Garrigues, I. Rico-Lattes, I. Pernet, A.
Denis, Photochem. Photobiol. 80 (2004) 316.
Lnkd = LnA − ꢁEaR−1T−1
(7)
From the slope, ꢁEaR−1 (= 3.0 × 103 K) and the intercept, Ln A
[18] E. Damiani, L. Rosati, R. Castagna, P. Carloni, L. Greci, J. Photochem. Photobiol.
B: Biol. 82 (2006) 204.
[19] D. Dondi, A. Albini, N. Serpone, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 5 (2006) 835.
[20] E. Damiani, W. Baschong, L. Greci, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 87 (2007)
95.
[21] S.P. Huong, E. Rocher, J.-D. Fourneron, L. Charles, V. Monnier, H. Bun, V. Andrieu,
J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 196 (2008) 106.
[22] G.J. Mturi, B.S. Martincigh, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 200 (2008) 410.
[23] C. Paris, V. Lhiaubet-Vallet, O. Jiménez, C. Trullas, M.Á. Miranda, Photochem.
Photobiol. 85 (2009) 178.
[24] M. Yamaji, Y. Aihara, T. Itoh, S. Tobita, H. Shizuka, J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994) 7014.
[25] E.W. Förster, K.H. Grellman, H. Linschitz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 (1973) 3108.
[26] M. Hoshino, M. Koizumi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 45 (1972) 2731.
[27] S.L. Murov, I. Carmichael, G.L. Hug, Handbook of Photochemistry, second ed.,
Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, 1993, Revised and Expanded.
[28] M.V. Encina, E.A. Lissi, E. Lemp, A. Zanocco, J.C. Scaiano, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105
(1983) 1856.
(= 24.56) of the line, the values of ꢁEa and A were, respectively,
determined to be 6.0 ( 0.3) kcal mol−1 and 4.6 ( 0.3) × 1010 s−1
.
The magnitude of the ꢁEa and A values of PrAB determined
here indicates that the photoelimination reaction of PrAB is a
typical adiabatic process. Activation energies and corresponding
frequency factors for photoelimination reactions of valerophenone
and isocaprophenone derivatives are reported [28]. These activa-
tion energies vary from 2.7 to 6.9 kcal mol−1 depending on the
substituent group whereas they are not much different from the
value (6.0 kcal mol−1) determined for PrAB. With the frequency
factors, those reported in the literature are in the magnitude of
1010–1011
s
−1, which are close to that for PrAB obtained in the
present work.