Journal of the American Chemical Society
ARTICLE
(8) Denk, K. D.; Rodezno, J. M.; Gupta, S.; Lough, A. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2001, 617-618, 242–253.
(27) Dible, B. R.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 872.
(28) (a) Similar H-bonded structures with alcohols and amines has
been investigated computationally, see the following: De Sarkar, S.;
Grimme, S.; Studer, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1190–1191.
(b) Similar H-bonded structure between diphenylamine and an imida-
zole-2-ylidene has been characterized by x-ray crystallography, see the
following.: Cowan, J. A.; Clyburne, J. A. C.; Davidson, M. G.; Harris,
R. L. W.; Howard, J. A. K.; Kupper, P.; Leech, M. A.; Richards, S. P.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1432.
(9) Amyes, T. L.; Diver, S. T.; Richard, J. P.; Rivas, F. M.; Tꢀoth, K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4366–4374.
(10) (a) Arduengo, A. J.; Goerlich, J.; Marshall, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 11027–11028. (b) Denk, M. K.; Thadani, A.; Hatano, K.;
Lough, A. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2607–2609.
(11) Insertion of carbenes into O-H bonds is also known with
alcohols (see ref 1a), and in the case of highly stabilized carbenes this
reaction was found to be reversible. See the following: Enders, D.;
Breuer, K.; Raabe, G.; Runsink, J.; Teles, J. H.; Melder, J. P.; Ebel, K.;
Brode, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1021.
(12) Forrꢀo, A.; Veszprꢀemi, T.; Nyulꢀaszi, L. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
2000, 3127–3129.
(29) Bader, R. W. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1985, 18, 9.
(30) Similar insertion with comparable barrier has been suggested in
case of the reaction of a cyclic(alkyl)(amino)carbene and ammonia, see
the following: Frey, G. D.; Lavallo, V.; Donnadieu, B.; Schoeller, W. W.;
Bertrand, G. Science 2007, 316, 439.
(13) Imidazole-2-ylidene has aromatic properties, see the following:
(a) Boeme, C.; Frenking, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2039–2046.
(b) Heinemann, C.; M€uller, T.; Apeloig, Y.; Schwartz, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 2023–2038. (c) Cheng, M.-J.; Hu, C.-H. Chem. Phys. Lett.
2001, 349, 477–482. (d) Hollꢀoczki, O.; Nyulꢀaszi, L. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
73, 4974–4979.
(14) (a) Teles, J. H.; Melder, J. P.; Ebel, K.; Schneider, R.; Gehrer, E.;
Harder, W.; Brode, S.; Enders, D.; Breuer, K.; Raabe, G. Helv. Chim. Acta
1996, 79, 61–83. (b) Giernoth, R.; Bankmann, D. Tetrahedron Lett.
2006, 47, 4293–4296.
(15) It is worthy to note that, in the case of thiazolium salts apart
from the proton exchange, the addition of the hydroxide to the C(2),
followed by the ring opening, has also been observed, and has also been
suggested as the possible reason for the facile absorption of thiamine into
the cells. See the following: (a) Duclos, J. M.; Haake, P. Biochemistry
1974, 13, 5358. (b) Zoltewicz, J. A.; Uray, G. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45,
2104.
(16) (a) Alder, R. W.; Allen, P. R.; Williams, S. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1995, 12, 1267–1268. (b) Kim, Y.-J.; Streitwieser, A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5757–5761. (c) Magill, A. M.; Cavell, K. J.; Yates,
B. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8717–8724. (d) Chu, Y.; Deng, H.;
Cheng, J.-P. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7790–7793.
(17) (a) Dupont, J.; de Souza, R. F.; Suarez, P. A. Z. Chem. Rev. 2002,
102, 3667–3692. (b) de Kort, M.; Tuin, A. W.; Kuiper, S.; Overkleeft,
H. S.; van der Marel, G. A.; Buijsman, R. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
2171–2175.
(18) Song, Z.;Wang, H.;Xing, L. J. Solution Chem. 2009, 38, 1139–1154.
(19) Kuo, J.; Ciobanu, C. V.; Ojam€ae, L.; Shavitt, I.; Singer, S. J.
J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 3583–3588.
(20) Cypryk, M.; Apeloig, Y. Organometallics 2002, 21, 2165–2175.
(21) Orregeno, J. F.; Cano, H.; Restrepo, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009,
113, 6517–6523.
(31) It should also be mentioned that the ring opening OH inserted
product can proceed via a different, less favorable path (35.8 kcal mol-1
barrier), yielding a zwitterionic structure [Me—N—CHdCH—N-
(Me)—C(H)dOH] that can isomerize to a rotamer of the same Schiff
base in a multistep reaction. The last step of this mechanism having a
61.9 kcal mol-1 barrier is likely to proceed via a bimolecular process and
with a small barrier. For more information, also see Supporting
Information.
(32) Although the isomerization of 8b to 3b provides only 0.2 kcal
mol-1 energy in gas phase calculations, single point PCM calculations
with THF as solvent showed 1.5 kcal mol-1 energy benefits, in better
agreement with the experiments. We also note that there are many
possible isomeric structures of both 8b and 3b; those in the schemes are
the most stable ones.
(33) Although 8a and 3a have identical energy in gas phase calcula-
tions, single point PCM calculations with THF as solvent indicated 3a to
be more stable by 0.8 kcal mol-1, in better agreement with the
experiments.
(34) Although in the case of two and three waters the TS of the
direct 7bw2-1 to 3bw2 and 7bw3-1 to 3bw3 rearrangement has also
been found (37.4 and 36.6 kcal mol-1 B3LYP/6-311þG** barriers,
respectively), the formation of 8b is easier (the 7bw2-2 to 8bw2 and
7bw3-2 to 8bw3 barriers being 24.5 and 21.6 kcal mol-1, respectively,
at the same level). Thus, the reaction presumably proceeds via 8bw2
and 8bw3
.
(35) (a) Kirov, M. V. J. Struct. Chem. 2002, 43, 790. (b) Terleczky,
P.; Nyulꢀaszi, L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2010, 488, 168–172.
(36) We have applied several different starting geometries as well as
initial optimizations with different fixed C2 carbon-hydroxide oxygen
distances, and reduced step sizes to locate this minimum.
(37) Gans-Eichler, T.; Gudat, D.; N€attinen, K.; Nieger, M. Chem.—
Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1162.
(38) For a reference to the chemical shift of water in different NMR
solvents, see the following: Budavari, S.; O'Neil, M. J.; Smith, A.;
Heckelman, P. E. The Merck Index, An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs,
and Biologicals, 11th ed.; Merck Co., Inc.: Rahway, NJ, 1989.
(39) Karlsson, R. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1973, 18, 290.
(22) Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2161–2200.
(23) This methodology has recently been successfully used to model
the hydrolysis of silyl-ethers. For more detailed discussion of the model,
and the accuracy of the B3LYP method compared to MP2, see the
following: Terleczky, P.; Nyulꢀaszi, L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 1096–
1104.
(40) Denk, M. K.; Rodezno, J. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 608,
122.
(24) (a) Frisch, M. J.; Gaussian 03, Revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.:
Wallingford CT, 2004.(b) RI-MP2 and RI-B97-D single point energies
have been calculated by the Turbomole 5.10 program package: Ahlrichs,
R.; B€ar, M.; H€aser, M.; Horn, H.; K€olmel, C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 162,
165. (c) DB-RI-MP2/cc-pVTZ//B3LYP/6-31þG*, ωB97X-D/6-
311þþG**//B3LYP/6-31þG*, DB-ωB97X-D/cc-pVTZ//B3LYP/6-
31þG* and MOS(ω600)-RI-MP2/cc-pVTZ//B3LYP/6-31þG* single
point energies have been calculated by the Q-Chem 3.2 program
package “Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum
chemistry program package”: Y. Shao, L.; et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
2006, 8, 3172.
(41) A stable derivative has recently been isolated: Aldeco-Perez, E.;
Rosenthal, A. J.; Donnadieu, B.; Parameswaran, P.; Frenking, G.;
Bertrand, G. Science 2009, 326, 556.
(42) Arduengo, A. J.; Gamper, S. F.; Tamm, M.; Calabrese, J. C.;
Davidson, F.; Craig, H. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 572.
(43) A B3LYP/6-31þG* scaling factor of 0.9679 was suggested:
Andersson, M. P.; Uvdal, P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 2937–2941.
(44) Pribble, N. R.; Zwier, T. S. Science 1994, 265, 75. Gruenloh,
C. J.; Carney, J. R.; Arrington, C. A.; Zwier, T. S.; Fredericks, S. Y.;
Jordan, K. D. Science 1997, 276, 1678.
(25) Schaftenaar, G.; Nordik, J. H. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000,
14, 123.
(45) Giernoth, R.; Bankmann, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2493.
(46) Bordwell, F. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 456–463.
(26) (a) Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 48, 13115.
(b) Kresse, G.; Furthm€uller, J. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15.
(c) Kresse, G.; Furthm€uller, J. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169.
789
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja103578y |J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 780–789