JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE: PART A: POLYMER CHEMISTRY DOI 10.1002/POLA
was removed by decantation, and the sedimentary gummy
residue was dissolved in THF (5 mL) and the solution was
dropped into diethyl ether (200 mL). The supernatant was
removed by decantation, and the residue was dried under
vacuum to afford copolymer 1 (1.45 g, 83%): Mn ¼ 2400;
Mw ¼ 4520; IR (KBr) 1736, 1624, 1597, 808, 752, 692; 1H
NMR (CDCl3, d): 2.5–2.7 (broad, 2H), 3.1–3.4 (broad, 2H),
3.6–4.4 (broad, 4H), 5.0–5.6 (broad, 1H), 6.6–8.0 (broad m,
11H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, d): 20.58, 33.87, 34.24, 65.66, 66.76,
67.08, 68.36, 68.78, 70.23, 70.56, 113.8, 114.4, 114.5, 121.0,
121.1, 121.2, 121.4, 121.6, 122.7, 122.8, 123.4, 126.5, 128.1,
128.2, 128.5, 129.2, 129.4, 132.5, 153.1, 153.2, 158.1, 158.2,
158.3, 172.6.
SCHEME 1 Anionic alternating copolymerization of epoxide
and aromatic lactone.
Reductive Cleavage of Copolymer 1
A solution of 1 (0.664 g; repeating unit 1.91 mmol) in THF
(10 mL) was added to a suspension of LiAlH4 (0.46 g) in
THF (20 mL) at 0 ꢂC, and then the mixture was stirred at
room temperature. After 24 h, the mixture was poured into
Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained on a JASCO model FT-IR-
460 plus. Number average molecular weight (Mn) and weight
average molecular weight (Mw) were estimated from size
exclusion chromatography, performed on a Tosoh model
HLC-8120GPC equipped with Tosoh TSK gel-Super HM-H
styrogel columns (6.0 mm / ꢀ 15 cm), using tetrahydrofu-
ran (THF) as an eluent at the flow rate of 0.6 mL minꢁ1
after calibration with polystyrene standards. Gas chromatog-
raphy (GC) was carried out with a Shimadzu gas chromato-
graph model GC-18A equipped with J&W Scientific DB-WAX-
ꢂ
phosphate buffer (400 mL) at 0 C, and then extracted with
ethyl acetate (200 mL) three times. The organic layers were
combined and washed with distilled water, dried over
MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure.
The residue was fractionated by column chromatography
[silica gel, eluent ¼ ethyl acetate/hexane (1/2 in v/v)] to
obtain 2 (0.578 g, 1.64 mol, 86%): 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, d)
1.65–1.80 (m, 2H), 3.09 (t, J ¼ 7.7), 3.42–3.50 (m, 2H), 4.11–
4.30 (m, 5H), 4.59 (t, J ¼ 5.1, 1H), 5.49 (d, J ¼ 4.4, 1H),
6.86–7.02 (m, 3H), 7.24–7.53 (m, 5H), 7.79 (d, J ¼ 9.0, 1H),
7.85 (d, J ¼ 7.9, 1H), 7.99 (d, J ¼ 8.6, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-
d6, d) 21.05, 22.12, 60.69, 114.47, 114.76, 120.61, 123.06,
123.19, 123.40, 126.27, 127.45, 128.41, 128.91, 129.52,
132.49, 153.32, 158.58.
ETR 125-7332 (0.53 mm
ꢀ
30 m) capillary column.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TG), differential thermal analy-
sis (DTA), and differential scanning calorimetric analysis
(DSC) were performed with a Seiko Instruments model
EXSTAR6000.
Synthesis of DHNP
DHNP was synthesized according to the reported method.10
R
2-Naphthol (4.43 g, 30.4 mmol) and Amberlyst 15V (3.0 g)
Copolymerization of Bis A-DGE and DHNP
were placed in a flask. Toluene (80 mL) and acrylic acid (4.42
g, 60.8 mmol) were added and heated with refluxing for 48 h.
During the reaction, formed water was removed by azeotropic
distillation. After cooling, the mixture was filtered, and the fil-
trate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue
was passed through a thin layer of silica gel with using ethyl
acetate/n-hexane (1/7 in v/v) as an eluent, and the eluted
fractions were combined, concentrated under reduced pres-
sure, and dried under vacuum to obtain DHNP (5.25 g; 87%):
Bis A-DGE (6.81 g, 20.0 mmol) and DHNP (1.40 g, 7.06
ꢂ
mmol) were mixed at 80 C under vacuum to obtain a homo-
geneous mixture. To this mixture, EMI (259 mg, 2.35 mmol)
was added at ambient temperature and stirred under vac-
uum to obtain the corresponding mixture. A small portion of
the mixture (ca 10 mg) was taken and used for DSC analysis
(30–200 ꢂC with heating rate of 10 ꢂC minꢁ1) to study the
heat evolution behavior during the curing reaction. The rest
ꢂ
was placed in a silicone vessel and heated at 100 C for 1 h.
1
ꢂ
mp 48–49 C; IR (KBr) 1769, 1515, 1077, 898, 811, 749; H
NMR (CDCl3, d) 2.88 (t, J ¼ 7.4, 2H), 3.30 (t, J ¼ 7.4, 2H),
7.20 (d, J ¼ 8.8, 1H), 7.45 (d, J ¼ 7.5, 1H), 7.55 (d, J ¼ 7.5,
1H), 7.74 (d, J ¼ 8.8, 1H), 7.84 (t, J ¼ 8.3, 2H); 13C NMR
(CDCl3, d) 19.75, 28.47, 115.41, 117.29, 122.69, 125.04,
127.03, 128.62, 128.81, 130.69, 130.99, 149.49, 168.28.
The resulting cured material was analyzed by Fourier Trans-
fer Infrared (FT-IR) to confirm the consumption of DHNP.
Ten milligrams of the mateꢂrial was analyzed by DSC (30–200
ꢂC with heating rate of 10 C minꢁ1) to measure glass transi-
tion temperature (Tg). Five milligrams of the material was
analyzed by TG/DTA (30–500 ꢂC with heating rate of 10 ꢂC
minꢁ1) to study its thermal decomposition behavior and
determine temperature for 10% weight loss (Td10).
Copolymerization of GPE and DHNP
Glycidyl phenyl ether (GPE; 751 mg, 5.00 mmol), DHNP (991
mg, 5.00 mmol), and EMI (11 mg, 0.10 mmol) were placed
in a flask filled with argon gas. By stirring the mixture at
room temperature, it became homogeneous. The resulting
homogeneous mixture was heated at 120 ꢂC for 1 h with
stirring. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was
dissolved in THF (5 mL) and the resulting solution was
poured into hexane (200 mL). After 1 h, the supernatant
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Synthesis of DHNP
DHNP was synthesized from 2-naphthol in a straightforward
manner (Scheme 2).10 By heating 2-naphthol with acylic acid
R
in the presence of AmberystV 15, an acidic ion exchange
resin, the cycloaddition reaction proceeded smoothly to
620
WILEYONLINELIBRARY.COM/JOURNAL/JPOLA