166
T. Jose et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 333 (2010) 158–166
Table 9
Reusability of the catalyst.
Run
% conversion
% selectivity
2-Methyl pentenal
3-Hydroxy-2-methyl-pentanal
2,4-Dimethyl hepta-2,4-dienal
Fresh catalyst
First recycle
Second recycle
Third recycle
Fourth recycle
Fifth recycle
82
82
80
78
77
75
96
96
95
94
95
93
2
2
3
2
2
6
2
2
2
4
3
1
Reaction conditions: catalyst = 50 mg, propanal = 2 g, temperature = 100 ◦C, rpm = 450.
3.8. Reusability of catalyst
tative aldehyde, pentanal significantly depended on the catalyst
amount, pentanal and temperature. The catalyst was separated and
effectively used up to six cycles under identical employed condi-
tions.
The spent catalyst was regenerated by washing with toluene.
It is then filtered and dried at 100 ◦C. The regenerated catalyst was
again used for the aldol condensation of the propanal under similar
conditions. From the data on conversion of propanal and selectivity
of 2-methylpentenal given in Table 9 it is observed that the cata-
lyst was reproducible up to six cycles without significant loss in
its activity for aldol condensation of propanal. Further more the
recycled catalyst was checked for elemental analysis to study the
leaching of the APTMS, if any. The obtained results were %C: 43.78,
%H: 6.82, %N: 10.59. This confirms the stable functionalization of
the CHM and the increase in %C may be attributed to the presence
of unreacted adsorbed aldehydes and products. The FT-IR spec-
trum of recycled catalyst also gave an intense stretch at 1649 cm−1
corresponding to the imine formed by the aldehyde during aldol
condensation.
Acknowledgments
Authors thank Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
(CSIR), New Delhi, India for financial supports for Network Project
for the Development of Specialty Inorganic Materials for Diverse
Applications. NS acknowledges CSIR, New Delhi for the award of
Senior Research Fellowship.
References
[1] Y.C. Chang, A.N. Ko, Appl. Catal. A 190 (2000) 149–155.
[2] A. Molnár, B. Rác, Curr. Org. Chem. 10 (2006) 1697–1726.
[3] K. Shimizu, E. Hayashi, T. Inokuchi, T. Kodama, H. Hagiwara, Y. Kitayama, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 43 (2002) 9073–9075.
[4] G. Zhang, H. Hattori, K. Tanabe, Appl. Catal. 40 (1988) 183–190.
[5] T. Yashima, H. Suzuki, N. Hara, J. Catal. 33 (1974) 486–492.
[6] P. Chu, G.W. Kuehl, US Patent, 4,605,787 (1986).
[7] P.T. Weirzechowski, L.W. Zatarski, Catal. Lett. 9 (1991) 411–414.
[8] S.K. Sharma, P.A. Parikh, R.V. Jasra, J. Mol. Catal. A 286 (2008) 55–62.
[9] S.K. Sharma, H.A. Patel, R.V. Jasra, J. Mol. Catal. A 280 (2008) 61–67.
[10] V.K. Díez, C.R. Apesteguía, J.I. Di Cosimo, J. Catal. 240 (2006) 235–244.
[11] S. Abelló, F. Medina, D. Tichit, J. Pérez-Ramírez, J.E. Sueiras, P. Salagre, Y. Ces-
teros, Appl. Catal. B 70 (2007) 577–584.
To check for any loss of APTMS from the system the fresh cata-
lyst (CHM) was mixed in toluene and the supernatant solution was
separated. In the separated supernatant solution salicylaldehyde
was added and the solution was checked by UV–vis spectroscopy
in which no peak characteristic to imine was observed indicating
that there is no loss of APTMS.
4. Conclusions
[12] P. Kus´trowski, D. Sułkowska, L. Chmielarz, A. Rafalska-Łasocha, B. Dudek, R.
Dziembaj, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 78 (2005) 11–22.
Chitosan has been modified using APTMS avoiding the use of
HCl and NaOH. The modified chitosan was found to be an effi-
cient catalyst for the self-aldol condensation for linear aldehydes
under solvent-free conditions. All the aldehydes selectively gave
the desired dehydrated aldol formation as major product. The cat-
alyst evaluated for C3–C7 linear aldehydes indicated a decreasing
trend in the conversion from propanal to 1-heptanal. The conver-
sions were found to be increased with time. As the reaction time
increased to 8 h the conversion reached up to 98% for propanal and
90% for heptanal. With the amount of catalyst of 100 mg and alde-
hyde 1 g, the conversion was 100% for all aldehydes within 2 h.
Kinetic performance of the catalyst investigated for a represen-
[13] H.A. Patel, S.K. Sharma, R.V. Jasra, J. Mol. Catal. A 286 (2008) 31–40.
[14] S.K. Sharma, V.K. Srivastava, R.S. Shukla, P.A. Parikh, R.V. Jasra, New J. Chem. 31
(2007) 277–286.
[15] G.E. Barker, D. Forster, U.S. Patent 4,426,542 (1984).
[16] E.B. Denkba, M. Odaba, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 76 (2000) 1637–1643.
[17] K.R. Reddy, K. Rajgopal, C.U. Maheswari, M.L. Kantam, New J. Chem. 30 (2006)
1549–1552.
[18] C. Peniche, W. Arguelles-Monal, N. Davidenko, R. Sastre, A. Gallardo, J.S. Roman,
J. Biomater. 20 (1999) 1869–1878.
[19] R. Valentin, K. Molvinger, F. Quignard, D. Brunel, New J. Chem. 27 (2003)
1690–1692.
[20] N. Sudheesh, S.K. Sharma, R.S. Shukla, J. Mol. Catal. A 321 (2010) 77–82.
[21] S.K. Sharma, P.A. Parikh, R.V. Jasra, J. Mol. Catal. A 278 (2007) 135–144.
[22] P. Moggi, G. Albanesi, Appl. Catal. 68 (1991) 285–300.
[23] H.E. Swift, J.E. Bozik, F.E. Massoth, J. Catal. 148 (1994) 759–770.