ARTICLE IN PRESS
T. Murata et al. / Physica B 405 (2010) S41–S44
S43
combined molecules are potential electron-donors for the devel-
opment of organic conductors with structural and electronic
modulations.
Acknowledgments
This work was in part supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (20550051) and that on Innovative Areas (20110006).
Y.Y. is a recipient of research fellowships of the Japan Society for
the Promotion of Science.
References
[1] G.R. Desiraju (Ed.), Crystal Design: Structure and Function, Perspectives in
Supramolecular Chemistry, vol. 7, Wiley, Chichester, 2003.
[2] M. Alajarin, A.E. Aliev, A.D. Burrows, K.D.M. Harris, A. Pastor, J.W. Steed, D.R.
Turner, Supramolecular Assembly via Hydrogen Bonds I, in: D.M.P. Mingos
(Ed.), Structure and Bonding, vol. 108, Springer, Berlin, 2004.
Fig. 2. Electronic spectra of CT complexes of 1 and 2 in KBr.
Table 2
D:A ratios, first CT transitions (h
[3] J. Yamada, T. Sugimoto (Eds.), TTF Chemistry: Fundamentals and Applications
of Tetrathiafulvalene, Kodansha, Tokyo, 2004.
nCT) in electronic spectra, room temperature
conductivities (
sRT), and activation energies (Ea) of CT complexes.
[4] G. Saito, Y. Yoshida, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 80 (2007) 1.
´
[5] M. Fourmigue, P. Batail, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 5379.
b
c
D:Aa
h
nCT (103 cmÀ1
)
sRT (S cmÀ1
)
Ea (eV)
[6] T. Murata, G. Saito, K. Nishimura, Y. Enomoto, G. Honda, Y. Shimizu, S. Matsui,
M. Sakata, O.O. Drozdova, K. Yakushi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 81 (2008) 331.
[7] T. Akutagawa, T. Hasegawa, T. Nakamura, T. Inabe, G. Saito, Chem.-Eur. J. 8
(2002) 4402.
[8] T. Inabe, J. Mater. Chem. 15 (2005) 1317.
[9] Y. Morita, T. Murata, H. Yamochi, G. Saito, K. Nakasuji, Synth. Met. 135–136
(2003) 579.
[10] T. Murata, Y. Morita, K. Fukui, K. Sato, D. Shiomi, T. Takui, M. Maesato,
H. Yamochi, G. Saito, K. Nakasuji, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 6343.
[11] T. Murata, Y. Morita, Y. Yakiyama, K. Fukui, H. Yamochi, G. Saito, K. Nakasuji,
J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 10837.
[12] Y. Morita, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Yakiyama, T. Murata, K. Nakasuji, Chem. Lett. 37
(2008) 24.
1–TCNQ
1–DDQ
1–QCl4
2–TCNQ
2–DDQ
2–QCl4
1:1
1:1
1:1
5:2
1:1
3:1
11.7
12.6
9.0
6.4 Â10À7
2.9 Â10À6
1.8 Â 10À6
4.5 Â10À2
2.7 Â10À4
1.9 Â10À3
0.53
0.35
0.47
0.12
0.23
0.19
ꢀ3.0
9.0
ꢀ3.0
a
Estimated by elemental analysis.
Measured for KBr pellets.
b
c
Measured for compressed pellets.
[13] J. Wu, N. Dupont, S. Liu, A. Neels, A. Hauser, S. Decurtins, Chem. Asian J.
4 (2009) 392.
TTF-Im [11], it can be presumed that H-bond formation of 1 with
acceptors on both sides of the molecule establishes a one-
dimensional D–A–D–A 1:1 H-bond chain, resulting in the 1:1
D–A ratios of the complexes. Furthermore, the fully ionic states of
the complexes even for QCl4 complex having a relatively weak
electron-accepting ability is assumed to be caused by the
modulation of redox abilities of component molecules of
H-bond as seen in the TTF-Im CT complexes [11].
[14] Y. Morita, T. Murata, S. Yamada, M. Tadokoro, A. Ichimura, K. Nakasuji,
J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 (2002) 2598.
[15] Y. Morita, T. Murata, K. Fukui, S. Yamada, K. Sato, D. Shiomi, T. Takui,
H. Kitagawa, H. Yamochi, G. Saito, K. Nakasuji, J. Org. Chem. 70 (2005) 2739.
[16] T. Murata, Y. Morita, K. Nakasuji, Tetrahedron 61 (2005) 6056.
[17] T. Murata, Y. Morita, Y. Yakiyama, Y. Yamamoto, S. Yamada, Y. Nishimura,
K. Nakasuji, Cryst. Growth Des. 8 (2008) 3058.
[18] Physical data of 1: mp. 185–186 1C (dec); 1H NMR (270 MHz, DMSO-d6, 80 1C)
d
6.98 (s, 2), 7.15 (s, 2), 7.28 (s, 2); IR (KBr) 3300–2500, 1590, 1104 cmÀ1; EI-
MS, m/z 336 (M+, 64%); Anal. Calcd. for (C12H8N4S4)(H2O)0.3: C, 42.16; H, 2.54;
N, 16.39%. Found: C, 42.38; H, 2.32; N, 16.08%. Due to the hygroscopic nature
(probably Z-isomer), inclusion of water molecule was considered in the
elemental analysis.
Similar to 1-DDQ, DDQ complex of 2 was also characterized as
a 1:1 fully ionic complex from the elemental analysis and optical
spectra, while TCNQ and QCl4 complexes were partial CT
complexes showing intermolecular CT bands at around
3000 cmÀ1 (Fig. 2b). Since the acceptor moieties of these
complexes are assignable as full ionic species from the resem-
blances with their radical anion salts in IR spectra (1572 and
1505 cmÀ1 (CQC stretching modes) for TCNQ complex and
1532 cmÀ1 (CQO stretching mode) for QCl4 complex), the donor
molecules possessed the partial CT state as average. Both
[19] Physical data of 2: mp. 163–165 1C (dec); 1H NMR (270 MHz, DMSO-d6, 80 1C)
d
6.84 (s, 2), 7.37 (s, 2), 7.66 (s, 2); IR (KBr) 3200–2200, 1624, 1099 cmÀ1; EI-
MS, m/z 336 (M+, 100%). Anal. Calcd. for (C12H8N4S4)(H2O)2: C, 38.69; H, 3.25;
N, 15.04%. Found: C, 38.87; H, 2.78; N, 14.65%. Since donor 2 was poorly
soluble in organic solvents and unstable in the solution state, elemental
analyses did not give the appropriate value even if the inclusion of water was
considered.
[20] Crystal data of 1: C12H8N4S4, Fw=336.46, monoclinic, P21/c, a=3.894(2),
3
˚
˚
b=18.02(1), c=10.033(5) A,
cmÀ3
(Mo K
b
=94.54(1)1, V=701.9(7) A , Z=2, Dcalcd.=1.592 g
,
m
a
)=6.69 cmÀ1, T=93 K, 1591 unique reflections. The structure
was refined to R1=0.044, RW=0.084 for 958 reflections with I4 3s(I) and 91
complexes exhibited semiconductive behaviors with
10À2 S cmÀ1 and Ea=0.12–0.19 eV (Table 2).
s –
RT=10À3
parameters, GOF=1.787. CCDC 751690.
[21] Physical data of CT complexes of 1. 1–TCNQ: IR (KBr) 3200–2600, 1624,
1572, 1505 cmÀ1
UV (KBr) 284, 762, 852 nm; Anal. Calcd. for
;
(C12H8N4S4)(C12H4N4)(H2O)3.5: C, 47.75; H, 3.17; N, 18.56%. Found: C, 48.02;
H, 2.49; N, 17.92%; 1–DDQ: IR (KBr) 3200–2800, 2215, 1623, 1546 cmÀ1; UV
(KBr) 386, 796 nm; Anal. Calcd. for (C12H8N4S4)(C8Cl2N2O2)(H2O)2: C, 40.07;
H, 2.02; N, 14.02%. Found: C, 39.95; H, 1.86; N, 13.70%; 1–QCl4: IR (KBr) 3100–
2700, 1690, 1623, 1532 cmÀ1; UV (KBr) 288, 838, ꢀ1100 nm; Anal. Calcd. for
(C12H8N4S4)(C6Cl4O2)(C3H7NO): C, 38.72; H, 2.47; N, 10.87%. Found: C, 38.37;
H, 2.12; N, 11.29%. Due to the small contamination by complexes having
different component ratios, the elemental analyses did not give the
appropriate value even if the inclusion of solvent and water was considered.
[22] Physical data of CT complexes of 2. 2–TCNQ: IR (KBr) 3200–2600, 1624, 1572,
4. Conclusions
We have synthesized two kinds of new H-bond functionalized
TTF derivatives having two imidazole moieties, 1 and 2. The two-
dimensional H-bond network and one-dimensional
were well determined by X-ray crystallographic analysis. CT
complexes of 1 with acceptors having a wide range of acceptor
strengths were 1:1 fully ionic complexes, implying the formation
of H-bond self-assemblies and the modulation of redox abilities of
component molecules by donor–acceptor H-bonds, while
2 afforded partial CT complexes showing semiconducting beha-
viors. These results demonstrate that the TTF–oligo(imidazole)s
p-stack of 1
1505 cmÀ1
; UV (KBr) 284, 762, 852 nm; Anal. Calcd. for (C12H8N4S4)5
(C12H4N4)2: C, 48.26; H, 2.31; N, 18.76%. Found: C, 48.48; H, 2.41; N,
18.27%; 2–DDQ: IR (KBr) 3200–2800, 2215, 1623, 1546 cmÀ1; UV (KBr) 386,
796, ꢀ1200 nm; Anal. Calcd. for (C12H8N4S4)(C8Cl2N2O2)(H2O): C, 41.31; H,
1.73; N, 14.45%. Found: C, 41.56; H, 1.77; N, 14.27%; 2–QCl4: IR (KBr) 3100–
2700, 1690, 1623, 1532 cmÀ1
;
UV (KBr) 288, 838 nm; Anal. Calcd. for
(C12H8N4S4)3(C6Cl4O2)(H2O)3: C, 38.53; H, 2.31; N, 12.84%. Found: C, 38.26;