porting Information for details of synthetic route). Function-
alization of the cyclometalated rings in 2 with ethoxy groups
is intended to modulate the mechanical (i.e. rotational) and
photophysical characteristics of the Pt-C,N,N units, as well
as improve solubility.
emission of 2 at lmax =594 nm in CH2Cl2 displays minimal
solvatochromism and identical emission energy and lifetime
3
to that of 3, indicating a ILCT excited state[15,16] although
3
some MLCT character cannot be ruled out. Like 1, the ad-
ditional broad, low-energy emission for 2 at lmax ꢀ720 nm
alters in intensity against the high-energy band in different
solvents: the lmax ꢀ720 nm band is negligible in DMSO (like
3 in CH2Cl2), weak in toluene and THF, and intensifies from
CH2Cl2 to MeOH and becomes the dominant feature in
CH3CN at the expense of the high-energy band (Figure 3).
The photophysical properties of 1–3 have been investigat-
ed in detail.[14] The intense absorption bands at l<400 nm
for 1 and 2 (slightly red-shifted for the latter) are attributed
to intraligand ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
1(pp*) transitions. For 1, the moderately in-
tense absorptions in the visible region at lmax =424 and
443 nm are very similar in shape and energy to known mon-
onuclear congeners,[8,9] while displaying comparable negative
solvatochromic behavior,[14] and are therefore ascribed as
d(Pt)!p*
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
(bpy) 1MLCT. No absorption tailing is apparent
below l=500 nm, in contrast to that observed for binuclear
analogues supported by short diphosphine bridges (e.g.
dppm),[8] thus signifying the expected absence of ground
state Pt···Pt interactions. The visible absorption of 2 at
lmax =444 nm is less structured than 1, but comparable in
shape to the mononuclear congener 3, and is assigned to an
admixture of p
A
(bpy) (1ILCT/1MLCT)
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
like that recently proposed for an alkoxy congener of 3.[15]
Using the rationale in a previous report,[8b] the corrected ab-
sorption difference spectrum between 2 and 3 contains a dis-
cernible band with a maximum at l=451 nm (eꢀ2000
dm3 molꢁ1 cmꢁ1; Figure 2), which is tentatively attributed to
weak ground-state intramolecular p–p interaction. A similar
band at lmax =458 nm is apparent in the corrected absorp-
tion difference spectrum between 1 and the non-ethoxy con-
gener of 3.[14]
Figure 3. Emission spectra for 2 (10ꢁ5 molLꢁ1) in different solvents (nor-
malized with respect to high-energy band; lex =430 nm) at 298 K (inset:
calculated offset p-stacked interactions in 2).
Interestingly, these emission features and particularly the
relative intensities of the high- and low-energy emissions for
both 1 and 2 are independent of complex concentration
(down to 10ꢁ6 molLꢁ1, thus discounting intermolecular ag-
gregation) and excitation wavelength (to reduce possibility
of contribution from highly emissive impurities).[14] Further-
more, the same excitation spectra are recorded for the high-
and low-energy emissions from 1 and 2 respectively, which
closely resemble their UV absorptions, especially for the
lowest-energy band at lmax ꢀ440 nm. The broad nature
(fwhmꢀ3400 cmꢁ1 in CH3CN for 2) and low F (10ꢁ4) of the
low-energy band are consistent with excimer-type emis-
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
sion.[11a,17] In this connection, an energy-minimized (Gaus-
sian) calculated structure of 2 (Figure 3) has predicted weak
p-stacked interplanar contacts within the (Pt-C,N,N)2 moiety
(plus a Pt···Pt separation of 5.63 ꢁ).[14] Since Pt···Pt interac-
tions can be disregarded, the low-energy emission is thus as-
signed to offset p-stacked interactions (i.e. “slipped” intra-
molecular interplanar contacts such as p–p and d(Pt)–p(aryl
and py) within the (Pt-C,N,N)2 moiety).[18] Owing to the
rigid nature of the xanthene backbone, the p-stacking inter-
actions may be very weak in the ground state (as tentatively
indicated in Figure 2), but become significantly more favora-
ble in the excited state, especially for 2 in solvents such as
CH3CN (Figure 3), and therefore the term excimer rather
than dimer emission is preferred. The relationship between
the unusual emission changes in Figure 3 and solvent polari-
Figure 2. UV/vis absorption spectra of 2 and 3 in CH2Cl2 at 298 K. Inset:
Plot of De versus wavelength for 2 and 3 (e values multiplied by 2) in
CH2Cl2.
Complexes 1 and 2 are luminescent in solution at room
temperature. For 1, in addition to the solvatochromic
3MLCT emission at lmax =562 nm in CH2Cl2, a weaker low-
energy shoulder is evident at lmax ꢀ750 nm. Upon further in-
vestigation in CH2Cl2/CH3OH (1:1), the low-energy feature
3
intriguingly grows (versus the MLCT emission) into a dis-
tinct peak at lmax ꢀ730 nm. Compared to 1, the red-shifted
12586
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 12585 – 12588