Scheme 2
Scheme 3
although it suffers from poor facial selectivity, it does
provide a successful synthetic path to (()-1.
The synthesis plan depicting our approach is outlined in
Scheme 1. This plan features an early installation of the
tetrahydrofuran ring followed by an intramolecular
Diels-Alder reaction with an o-quinone subunit to con-
struct the bicyclo[2.2.2]octane ring system incorporating a
potentially sensitive enol ether.4 The enol ether is intended
to serve as a radical acceptor for the eventual assembly of
the six-memberedlactone.5 The synthesiswillbe concluded
by the formation of the cyclohexenone via intramolecular
aldol cyclization of ketoaldehyde 2.6 Sesamol (6) was
identified as the starting material for synthesis of IMDA
reaction substrate 5. Lability of the enol ether in inter-
mediates such as 3 and 4 was of concern during the design
stages of this investigation.
Alkylation of sesamol with hinderedneopentylic alcohol
77 was carried out under the Mitsunobu conditions in 63%
yield (Scheme 2).8 ortho-Metalation of 8 with n-butyl-
lithium in THF at room temperature followed by trans-
metalation with zinc chloride to the corresposnding
arylzinc chloride reagent and coupling with methyl chlo-
roxoacetate delivered ketoester 9 in 46% yield along with
the recovery of 25% of the starting material.9 The
R-ketoester was advanced to R-diazoester 10 by a two-step
process involving the intermediacy of the tosylhydrazone
generated from 9 and its fragmentation under basic con-
ditions (DBU) in CH2Cl2 at room temperature.10
Diazoester 10 served as a substrate for the formation of
requisite benzofuran 11 by an intramolecular C-H func-
tionalization process. Exposure of 10 to a catalytic amount
of rhodium acetate (1 mol %) in carefully degassed dry
˚
CH2Cl2 in the presence of 4 A molecular sieves resulted in a
clean transformation affording 11 in 86% yield with 10:1
diastereoselectivity.11,12
In order to explore the feasibility of the IMDA process
that forms the basis of our synthesis plan, we chose to
introduce a methyl substituent at the C10 position as a
mimic of the related quaternary center in the natural
product. Thus, for the purposes of this study, the zincate
enolate generated from ester 11 by enolization with LiN-
(SiMe3)2 and addition of diethylzinc was treated with
iodomethane in the presence of DMPU, affording the
alkylation product in quantitative yield as an inseparable
mixture of diastereomers (3:1, Scheme 3).13 Methylation
using a more standard procedure without the addition of
diethylzinc (LiN(SiMe3)2, THF) afforded less than 10%
yield of the desired product and was complicated by
the formation of intractable mixture of products. Upon
(3) Gong, J.; Lin, G.; Sun, W.; Li, C.-C.; Yang, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 16745–16746.
(4) For recent examples using masked ortho-quinone as substrates for
Diels-Alder reactions, see:(a) Chu, C.-S.; Lee, T.-H.; Rao, P. D.; Song,
L.-D.; Liao, C.-C. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4111–4118. (b) Nicolaou,
K. C.; Toh, Q.-Y.; Chen, D. Y.-K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11292–
11293. (c) Singh, V.; Bhalerao, P.; Mobin, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010,
51, 3337–3339.
(5) (a) Trost, B. M.; Waser, J.; Meyer, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 16424–16434. (b) Trost, B. M.; Nguyen, H. M.; Koradin, C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 6232–6235.
(6) (a) Mahrwald, R. Modern Aldol Reactions, Vol.s 1 and 2, 2004,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. Recent applications: (b) Stivala, C. E.; Zakarian, A.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 839–842. (c) Qin, Y.; Stivala, C. E.; Zakarian, A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7466–7469. (d) Stivala, C.; Zakarian, A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3774–3776.
(7) O’Connor, P. D.; Kim, U. B.; Brimble, M. A. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 4405–4411.
(8) Mitsunobu, O.; Yamada, M.; Mukaiyama, T. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1967, 40, 935–939.
(9) Velkov, J.; Mincheva, Z.; Bary, J.; Boireau, G.; Fujier, C. Synth.
(10) Yang, J.; Wu, H.; Shen, L.; Qin, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
13794–13795.
(11) (a) Davies, H. M. L.; Manning, J. R. Nature 2008, 451, 417–424.
(b) Koizumi, Y.; Kobayshi, H.; Wakimoto, T.; Furuta, T.; Fukuyama,
T.; Kan, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16854–16855. (c) Saito, H.;
Oishi, H.; Kitagaki, S.; Nakamura, S.; Anada, M.; Hashimoto, S. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 3887–3890.
(12) The assignment of relative stereochemistry is tentative and is
based on literature precedent, see refs.11a-11c
(13) (a) Morita, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Noyori, R. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54,
1785–1787Recent applications:. (b) Ilardi, E. A.; Isaacman, M. J.; Qin,
Y.-c.; Shelly, S. A.; Zakarian, A. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 3261–3269. (c)
Iimira, S.; Overman, L. E.; Paulini, R.; Zakarian, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 13095–13101.
Commun. 1997, 27, 375–378.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 5, 2011
1081