Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the NHMRC IRISS Grant 361646
and a Victorian State Government OIS grant
Scheme 9 Employing the functionalized auxiliary to isolate the amide
18.
Notes and References
1 D. G. Udugamasooriya and M. R. Spaller, Biopolymers, 2008, 89, 653–
667.
2 R. Nakagaki, H. Sakuragi and K. Mutai, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 1989, 2,
187–204.
3 R. M. Williams and J. W. Liu, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 2130–
2132.
4 F. Carelier-Frontin, S. Achmad, J. Verducci, R. Jacquier and G. Pepe,
THEOCHEM, 1993, 286, 125.
approach for the synthesis of a lactam via RCM. As shown in
Scheme 10, the functionalised auxiliary 34 was able to effect the
cyclisation as well as auxiliary 19, and enable a much more facile
isolation of the desired macrocycle 11.
5 D. Skropeta, K. A. Jolliffe and P. Turner, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69,
8804–8809.
6 C. J. Creighton, Y. M. Du and A. B. Reitz, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2004,
12, 4375–4385.
7 M. El Haddadi, F. Cavelier, E. Vives, A. Azmani, J. Verducci and J.
Martinez, J. Pept. Sci., 2000, 6, 560–570.
8 N. Schmiedeberg and H. Kessler, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 59–62. Mutter’s
pseudoprolines were reported to stabilize the cisoid conformation in the
very first report (; T. Haack and M. Mutter, Tetrahedron Lett., 1992,
33, 1589–1592) but, like subsequent studies with N-benzyl reversible
backbone protection (; T. Johnson and M. Quibell, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1994, 35, 463–466; L. P. Miranda, W. D. F. Meutermans, M. L. Smythe
and P. F. Alewood, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 5460–5468), their use
was advocated for improving the synthesis of problematic sequences
through destruction of secondary structure interference. Schmiedeberg
and Kessler used pseudoprolines in this context, even though this was
for the specific purpose of enabling cyclization and where it was implicit
that cisoid amide bond stabilization underpinned their reasoning but
this was not stated as such. Two years later, Skropeta et al. (ref. 5)
made it explicit that their use of pseudoprolines was for the purpose of
stabilizing a cisoid amide bond in order to facilitate cyclizations.
9 A. J. Brouwer and R. M. J. Liskamp, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 3662–
3668.
Scheme 10 Employing the functionalized aniline to facilitate isolation of
the lactam.
In summary, we have described a new auxiliary that facilitates
the formation of macrocyclic lactams via stabilization of a cisoid
amide bond, promoting rapid and high yielding ring closure via
RCM.
10 N. Sayyadi, I. Luck, J. Cleg,g and K. A. Jolliffe, Org. Lett., 2010, 12,
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that an
acylurea has been regarded as a masked cisoid secondary amide.
This conformation is maintained by the strong intramolecular
hydrogen bond characteristic of the closed form of the acylurea.11b
There are several attractive features of our approach. Firstly, the
masked amide is rigidly maintained in the cis conformation.17 This
is in contrast with N-alkylated tertiary amides where the cis form
is only relatively stabilized but not necessarily thermodynamically
preferred over the trans form. As such, it is not uncommon for
cyclization reaction times involving N-alkyl tertiary amides to be
measured in the order of days rather than hours.6 Secondly, the
use of amine deprotection to initiate self-cleavage allows for great
versatility in the choice of protecting groups beyond the use of Boc.
In principle Fmoc protecting groups could allow for initiation of
self-cleavage under basic conditions.
3136–3139.
11 (a) G. L. Lessene, J. Baell PCT Int. Appl. WO 2006002474; (b) G.
Lessene, B. J. Smith, R. W. Gable and J. B. Baell, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74,
6511–6525; (c) Mimetic design has been disclosed in depth in a number
of fora, including posters (1st Conforth conference, Sydney 2002; 19th
RACI conference, Lorne 2003; 20th RACI conference, Cairns 2004)
and oral presentations (Connect 2005, 12th RACI Convention, Sydney
2005; 7th ESH conference on Mechanisms of Cell Death and Disease:
Advances in Therapeutic Intervention and Drug Development, 2004).
12 C. W. Lee and R. H. Grubbs, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 7155–
7158.
13 H. Hagiwara, T. Katsumi, V. P. Kamat, T. Hoshi, T. Suzuki and M.
Ando, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 7231–7234.
14 A. G. M. Barret, A. J. Hennessy, R. Le Vezouet, P. A. Procopiou, P. W.
Seale, S. Stefaniak, R. J. Upton, A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, J.
Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 1028–1037.
15 No self-cleavage was observed in DCM when allowed to stand for 2–6 h
at room temperature.
16 D. Glynn, D. Bernier and S. Woodward, Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49,
We believe there is much scope for this auxiliary methodology
to become a valuable tool for the synthesis of macrocyclic lactams,
peptidomimetics, cyclic peptides and natural products via RCM.
5687–5688.
17 We have shown (ref. 11b) that when R1 in Scheme 1 is branched, a
second conformation can also exist.
658 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 656–658
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©