68
A.S. Gupta et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 138 (2015) 67–72
sciences. Colorimetric sensors do not need any spectroscopic
instrument since colorimetric changes can be detected by the
naked eye. But use of such sensors is limited because of their low
absorption. Fluorescent sensors based on excited-state intramolec-
ular proton transfer (ESIPT), as seen from 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)
benzimidazole/thiazole/oxazole have been attracted more atten-
tion [9]. ESIPT sensors exhibit dual emissions from both the excited
enol and keto tautomers [10]. Fluorescent sensing of fluoride ion
could realize by prohibiting ESIPT through coordination or depro-
tonation induced by fluoride with ESIPT centers, resulting in
detectable spectral change. Compared with widely used photoin-
duced electron transfer (PET) mechanism for sensing [11], the fluo-
rescent sensors based on ESIPT can afford many advantages
including dual fluorescence intensity changes and large stokes
shift, thus the excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT)
has attained a special importance due to vast applications as laser
dyes, UV-photostabilizer, scintillators, membrane and protein
probes and as a potential component for photo switches and
organic LEDs. ESIPT usually occur in the molecules bearing an
H-bond donor group usually a phenolic/amino moiety associated
with basic site (O, N, S) in the ground state through H-bond
interactions. This proton which is covalently attached in the elec-
tronically excited state migrates to a neighboring hydrogen-
bonded atom which is less than 2 Å. The significant amount of
excited state energy is dissipated in this process. The formed
phototautomer emits light at a lower energy with an unusually
large Stokes shift (range from 100 to 500 nm) and thermally
equilibrates back to the ground state with the proton bound to
its original atom. This large stokes shift is an important property
for fluorophores because the self-absorption, or the inner filter
effect, can be avoided and the fluorescent analysis can also be
improved. They can detect metal ions with ratiometric fluores-
cence response, providing self calibration function and avoiding
photodamage, scattering light and strong interference derived
from short wavelength emission in biological media.
1 and 2 was prepared at 10ꢁ3 M in distilled CH3CN. Tetrabutylam-
monium salts were used for the anions. All absorption and fluores-
cence scans were saved as ASC II files and further processed in
Excel™ to produce all graphs shown. Solutions of 1 and 2 were typ-
ically 20
lM for UV–Vis studies. Stability constants were deter-
mined using Benesi–Hildebrand Equation [15] (Eq. (1))
1
1
1
¼
þ
ð1Þ
n
K½Fꢁꢂ ðAmax ꢁ A0Þ
ðA ꢁ A0Þ ðAmax ꢁ A0Þ
where A0, A, Amax are the absorption considered in the absence of
ion, at an intermediate, and at a concentration of saturation. K is
binding constant, [Fꢁ] is concentration of ion. n is the stoichiometric
ratio.
Computational methods
The ground state (So) geometry of probe 2 was optimized using
Density Functional Theory (DFT) [16]. The functional used was
B3LYP and basis set used for all atoms were 6-31G(d,p). The verti-
cal excitation energy and oscillator strengths at the ground state
equilibrium geometries were calculated using with the same
hybrid functional and basis set. The low-lying first singlet excited
state (S1) of the probe 2 was relaxed using to obtain its minimum
energy geometry. Frequency computations were also carried out
on the optimized geometry of the low-lying vibronically relaxed
first excited state of the probe 2 and probe 2.Fꢁ.
Synthesis of probes 1 and 2
Probe 1 – 3,4 Diaminobenzophenone (500 mg, 2.3 mmol) and
benzaldehyde (374 mg, 3.5 mmol) were dissolved in 10 mL
nitrobenzene. The reaction mixture was refluxed for about 24 h,
and then cooled to room temperature. The solid separated was fil-
tered by using sintered crucible with the help of vacuum filtration
method and washed with diethyl ether to obtain colorless solid of
probe 1 (225 mg, 89% yield); Mpt. 220–221 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3 + -
DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): d 8.26–8.25 (m, 2H, Ar), 8.17 (s, 1H, Ar), 7.85–
7.76 (m, 4H, Ar), 7.66–7.48 (m, 7H, Ar), 4.97 (bs, NH); 13C NMR
(CDCl3 + DMSO-d6, 100 MHz): d 195.52 (C@O), 137.50, 130.94,
128.72, 127.90, 127,17, 123.08, 120.82, 117.33, 113.28, 110.96
(Ar H); (Figs. S1 and S2). MS (ESI) m/z 299 (M++H) (Fig. S3).
Probe 2 – 3,4 Diaminobenzophenone (1 g, 4.7 mmol) and sali-
cylaldehyde (630 mg, 5.1 mmol) were dissolved in 30 mL nitroben-
zene. The reaction mixture was refluxed for about 24 h, and then
cooled to room temperature. The solid separated was filtered and
washed with diethyl ether to obtain yellow colored solid which
was further purified by column chromatography to get pure probe
2 (528 mg, 92% yield); Mpt. 240–241 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3 + DMSO-
d6, 400 MHz): d 12.57 (bs, 1H, NH), 9.63 (bs, 1H, OH), 8.35 (s, 1H,
ArH), 7.96 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.88 (d, 1H, J = 8.28 Hz, ArH), 7.61–7.57
(m, 4H, ArH), 7.29–7.24 (t, 1H, J = 9.16 Hz, ArH), 7.14–7.10 (t, 1H,
J = 11.0 Hz, ArH), 7.00–6.96 (t, 1H, J = 7.36 Hz, ArH), 6.86–6.79 (m,
1H, ArH), 5.77 (s, 1H, ArH); 13C NMR (CDCl3 + DMSO-
d6,100 MHz): d 195.56 (C@O), 158.29, 137.86, 131.68, 129.31,
127.90, 126.06, 124.82, 124.29, 120.72, 118.71, 117.09, 113.75,
112.06, 110.97 (ArH); (Figs. S4 and S5). MS (ESI) m/z 314.11
(M++H) (Fig. S6) (see Scheme 1).
We have recently reported some ESIPT based cation and anion
sensors based on hydroxyarylbenzimidazole moiety [12]. In the
present manuscript ESIPT fluorescent probe 2 has been synthesized
with different strategy other than reported scheme [13] which
showed sensitivity changes towards fluoride ions. The presence
of fluoride ions caused decrease in absorption intensity at
335 nm and immergence of new absorption band at 360 nm. How-
ever, in case of emission presence of fluoride ion caused quenching
of keto tautomer at 540 nm and enol tautomer band is released at
420 nm.
Experimental section
Materials and equipments
All chemicals were purchased from Loba and Sigma Aldrich
Chemical Co and used without further purification. Column chro-
matography was performed using silica gel (60–120 mesh). All
reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography. Chloro-
form: Methanol was the adopted solvent system. Melting points
were carried out by the open capillary tube method [14] and
uncorrected. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were carried out using
a JEOL ECS-400 MHz spectrometer in SAI Labs, Thapar University,
Patiala with TMS as an internal reference. Mass Spectra of the syn-
thesized compounds were recorded at MAT 120 in SAIF, Punjab
University. All chemical shifts are reported in ppm relative to the
TMS as an internal reference. UV–Vis studies were carried out on
a Specord PC machines using slit width of 1.0 nm and matched
quartz cells. Fluorescence spectra were determined on a Varian
Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrometer. Stock solution of probes
Results and discussion
Photophysical properties of probes 1 and 2
The UV–Vis spectroscopic properties of probe 1–2 were investi-
gated in CH3CN at 20
lM. Probe 1 and 2 displayed an absorption
band centered at 320 nm and 335 nm respectively. Addition of