80
N. X.-Y. Ling et al. / Carbohydrate Research 352 (2012) 70–81
4.10. Determination of kinetic parameters
Acknowledgements
Michaelis constant (Km) and maximum velocity (Vmax) of the en-
zyme towards dGA at pH 3.8 and 37 °C were determined by a
Lineweaver–Burk plot.64 The substrate concentration was varied
Microbial isolation work for the source of enzyme was carried
out by Kathryn Davis (Department of Microbiology and Immunol-
ogy, University of Melbourne). All sample-derived tryptic peptide
analyses were run by Dr. Siria Natera, and the MS and MS/MS data
were interpreted and de novo sequenced by Ms. Kristina Ford and
Dr. Siria Natera (School of Botany, The University of Melbourne).
This project was supported by funds from the Co-operative Re-
search Centre (CRC) for Bioproducts and Melbourne International
Research Scholarship (MIRS).
over the range of 4.2–83.3 mg/mL, using 0.6 lg protein of the en-
zyme. The initial reaction velocity was determined by measuring
the amount of reducing sugar increase per unit time using the
reducing sugar assay.
4.11. Substrate specificity
Supplementary data
The activity of the enzyme towards various substrates was mea-
sured using the reducing sugar assay. The reaction mixture con-
tained the enzyme at a concentration of 0.51 mg/mL in TSK 55
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
(S) running buffer (0.05
(1.25 mM for methyl glycosides of b-(1?6)-linked
oligosaccharides, 2.5 mM for methyl glycosides of b-(1?3)-linked
-galacto-oligosaccharides, 1.25 mg/mL for b-(1?3)-galactan and
lg
or
1
lg
protein) and substrate
D-galacto-
References
D
1. Aspinall, G. O. Carbohydrate Polymers of Plant Cell Walls. In Biogenesis of Plant
Cell Wall Polysaccharides; Loewus, F., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1973; pp
95–115.
2. Qi, W.; Fong, C.; Lamport, D. T. A. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96, 848–855.
3. Goodrum, L. J.; Patel, A.; Leykam, J. F.; Kieliszewski, M. J. Phytochemistry 2000,
54, 99–106.
4. Clarke, A. E.; Anderson, R. L.; Stone, B. A. Phytochemistry 1979, 18, 521–540.
5. Churms, S. C.; Merrifield, E. H.; Stephen, A. M. Carbohydr. Res. 1983, 123, 267–
279.
b-(1?3;1?6)-galactan or 5 mg/mL for gum arabic, larch arabino-
galactan and dGA)) in sodium acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 3.8). The
total reaction mixture (50
b-glycosides of b-(1?3)-linked
dGA or 25 L for all other substrates) was incubated for 5 min,
lL
for those that contain methyl
D
-galacto-oligosaccharides and
l
10 min, 1 h or 24 h.
6. Fincher, G. B.; Stone, B. A.; Clarke, A. E. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1983, 34, 47–70.
7. Nothnagel, E. A. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1997, 174, 195–291.
8. Sun, W.; Xu, J.; Yang, J.; Kieliszewski, M. J.; Showalter, A. M. Plant Cell Physiol.
2005, 46, 975–998.
4.12. Mode of action
9. Osman, M. E.; Menzies, A. R.; Williams, P. A.; Phillips, G. O.; Baldwin, T. C.
Carbohydr. Res. 1993, 246, 303–318.
10. Osman, M. E.; Menzies, A. R.; Martin, B. A.; Williams, P. A.; Phillips, G. O.;
Baldwin, T. C. Phytochemistry 1995, 38, 409–417.
11. Tischer, C. A.; Gorin, P. A. J.; Iacomini, M. Carbohydr. Polym. 2002, 47, 151–158.
12. Tischer, C. A.; Iacomini, M.; Gorin, P. A. J. Carbohydr. Res. 2002, 337, 1647–1655.
13. Ponder, G. R.; Richards, G. N. Carbohydr. Polym. 1997, 34, 251–261.
14. Brillouet, J.-M.; Williams, P.; Will, F.; Muller, G.; Pellerin, P. Carbohydr. Polym.
1996, 29, 271–275.
15. Saulnier, L.; Brillouet, J.-M.; Moutounet, M.; du Penhoat, C. H.; Michon, V.
Carbohydr. Res. 1992, 224, 219–235.
16. Tsumuraya, Y.; Hashimoto, Y.; Yamamoto, S. Carbohydr. Res. 1987, 161, 113–
126.
17. Tsumuraya, Y.; Ogura, K.; Hashimoto, Y.; Mukoyama, H.; Yamamoto, S. Plant
Physiol. 1988, 86, 155–160.
18. Bacic, A.; Churms, S. C.; Stephen, A. M.; Cohen, P. B.; Fincher, G. B. Carbohydr.
Res. 1987, 162, 85–93.
The mode of action of the purified enzyme on methyl b-
glycosides of b-(1?3)-linked
D-galacto-tetra-/penta-/hepta-
pyranosides was studied by analysing the products liberated from
the substrates on a TLC plate of Silica Gel 60 (20 cm ꢃ 20 cm) with
aluminium backing (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The reaction
mixture (ꢀ33
l
L final volume) consisted of the enzyme (0.6
lg
protein) and substrate (5 mM, 15
lL) in sodium acetate buffer
(25 mM, pH 3.8). The reaction mixture was incubated for 0, 5, 10
and 15 min at 37 °C and boiled for 5 min in a water bath to
terminate the reaction. TLC was performed in a solvent mixture
of 1-propanol/ethanol/water (7:1:2, v/v/v; ꢀ75 mL). The TLC plate
was air-dried and sprayed with 20% (v/v) H2SO4 in methanol, and
the sugars were detected by charring the plate at 100 °C for
ꢀ5 min.
19. Kieliszewski, M. J.; Dezacks, R.; Leykam, J. F.; Lamport, D. T. A. Plant Physiol.
1992, 98, 919–926.
20. Kieliszewski, M. J. Phytochemistry 2001, 57, 319–323.
21. Shpak, E.; Leykam, J. F.; Kieliszewski, M. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. [PNAS]
1999, 96, 14736–14741.
4.13. Monosaccharide analysis
22. Shpak, E.; Barbar, E.; Leykam, J. F.; Kieliszewski, M. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276,
11272–11278.
23. Xu, J.; Tan, L.; Lamport, D. T. A.; Showalter, A. M.; Kieliszewski, M. J.
Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 1631–1640.
24. Estévez, J. M.; Kieliszewski, M. J.; Khitrov, N.; Somerville, C. Plant Physiol. 2006,
142, 458–470.
25. Svetek, J.; Yadav, M. P.; Nothnagel, E. A. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 14724–14733.
26. Johnson, K. L.; Jones, B. J.; Schultz, C. J.; Bacic, A. Non-Enzymic Cell Wall (Glycol)
Proteins In The Plant Cell Wall: Annual Plant Reviews; Rose, J. C. K., Ed.; Blackwell
Publishing: Australia, 2003; Vol. 8, pp 111–154.
Methanolysis was carried out by the method of Chaplin
(1982),65 as modified by Ferguson (1992).66 Monosaccharide link-
age composition was determined by GCMS of the partially methyl-
ated alditol acetates with and without prior carboxyl reduction,
essentially as described by Sims and Bacic (1995)67 and Kim et
al. (2006).68
27. van Hengel, A. J.; van Kammen, Ab.; de Vries, S. C. Physiol. Plantarum 2002, 114,
637–644.
4.14. MALDI-TOF MS analysis
28. Letarte, J.; Simion, E.; Miner, M.; Kasha, K. J. Plant Cell Rep. 2006, 24, 691–698.
29. Putoczki, T. L.; Pettolino, F.; Griffin, M. D. W.; Möller, R.; Gerrard, J. A.; Bacic, A.;
Jackson, S. L. Planta 2007, 226, 1131–1142.
30. Lee, K. J. D.; Sakata, Y.; Mau, S.-L.; Pettolino, F.; Bacic, A.; Quatrano, R. S.; Knight,
C. D.; Knox, J. P. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 3109–3112.
31. Brillouet, J.-M.; Williams, P.; Moutounet, M. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1991, 55, 1565–
1571.
32. Menestrina, J. M.; Iacomini, M.; Jones, C.; Gorin, P. A. J. Phytochemistry 1998, 47,
715–721.
33. Pellerin, P.; Brillouet, J.-M. Carbohydr. Res. 1994, 264, 281–291.
34. Hirano, Y.; Tsumuraya, Y.; Hashimoto, Y. Physiol. Plantarum 1994, 92, 286–296.
35. Haque, M. A.; Kotake, T.; Tsumuraya, Y. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2005, 69,
2170–2177.
The oligosaccharide products of enzyme hydrolysis were ana-
lysed by MALDI-TOF MS after derivatisation by acetylation to en-
hance sensitivity.69 Peracetylated sample (1
l
L) was mixed with
L, 10 mg/mL dihydroxybenzoic acid in 50% acetonitrile)
L of the mixture was spotted onto a sample well of a MALDI
matrix (1
and 1
l
l
plate and air dried. Spectra were obtained at 50 shots/spectrum on
a MALDI-TOF MS (Applied Biosystems Voyager DE-STR System
4180, Foster City, CA, USA) in delayed (200 ns) reflector mode at
positive polarity with an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and grid
voltage of 69%.
36. Li, S.-C.; Han, J.-W.; Chen, K.-C.; Chen, C.-S. Phytochemistry 2001, 57, 349–359.