Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article
pressure. The crude material was purified by flash column
chromatography (1:1 hexane/ethyl acetate) to afford product 7 (190
mg, 46%) as a yellow solid. UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 304 nm (17.7
mM−1 cm−1). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 70 °C) δ 1.09 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H),
1.83−1.89 (m, 2H), 2.62 (s, 3H), 3.40 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 3.64 (t, J =
5.9 Hz, 2H), 3.89 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 3.95−4.00 (m, 4H), 7.60 (s,
1H), 8.66 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 70 °C) δ 14.81, 20.88, 25.71,
44.17, 45.66, 50.25, 50.62, 61.25, 120.54, 123.68, 135.03, 142.39,
142.85, 151.90, 155.48. Anal. (C15H20N6O8) C, H, N.
The methyl and methoxy substituents in compounds 6, 7, 9,
and 11 were introduced in order to increase the electron
density at the carbon bearing the diazeniumdiolate moiety.
Increased electron density would render these analogues less
susceptible to nucleophilic attack and thus hamper rate-limiting
formation of the Meisenheimer complex along with the
subsequent elimination of the diazeniumdiolate anion. Indeed,
this modification to the structure led to an increased half-life of
the compounds, which did not, however, translate to increased
antiproliferative activity. The substituted analogue lacked the
ability to induce SAPK/JNK phosphorylation and ATF3
induction both in vitro and in vivo.
Our results suggest that rate of reactivity with GSH is a
critical factor for the effectiveness of this class of compounds,
perhaps due to increased ROS consequent to GSH depletion.
An alternative explanation may be the fact that by being less
reactive with GSH, 6 is less efficient in delivering NO (the
primary toxin in these prodrugs) to the malignant cells
(Scheme 3). Stereoelectronic perturbations associated with
methyl and methoxy substitutions of the aromatic ring may also
contribute to the observed differences in in vivo activity. Most
likely, our observations are due to a combination of these
factors.
O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-methoxyphenyl) 1-[(4-Ethoxycarbonyl)-
piperazin-1-yl]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (9) (JS-56−32). To a
solution of 8 (246 mg, 0.612 mmol) in 10 mL of dichloromethane was
added 5.4 M sodium methoxide in methanol (0.113 mL, 0.612 mmol).
The resulting orange solution faded to a light yellow−orange solution.
TLC analysis on silica gel using 10:1 dichloromethane:ethyl acetate
indicated that all the starting material had reacted within the first 5
min of reaction. The solution was diluted with 25 mL of
dichloromethane, washed with water, dried over sodium sulfate,
filtered through a layer of anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and
evaporated under vacuum to give 208 mg of a resin. The resin
solidified upon trituration with ether, and the resulting yellow powder
was collected by filtration giving product 10 (128 mg, 51%): mp 142−
144 °C; UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 276 nm (10.2 mM−1 cm−1). 1H NMR
(CDCl3) δ 1.29 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) 3.57−3.62 (m, 4H), 3.72−3.75 (m,
4H), 4.09 (2, 3H), 4.19 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H) 7.11 (s, 1H), 8.79 (s, 1H).
13C NMR, (CDCl3) δ 14.61, 42.20, 50.71, 57.54, 62.10, 101.52,
125.57, 154.21, 157.84, 165.87, 175.96. Anal. (C14H18N6O9) C, H, N.
O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-methoxyphenyl) 1-[(4-Ethoxycarbonyl)-
homopiperazin-1-yl]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (11) (RN-2−
50). To a solution of 4 (254 mg, 1.0 mmol) in 5% sodium
bicarbonate (8 mL) was added a solution of 10 (216 mg, 1.0 mmol) in
1:1 THF/tBuOH (8 mL) at room temperature. After 12 h, the
reaction mixture was diluted with 15 mL of ether, and the organic layer
was separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with ether (2 × 10
mL). The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium
sulfate, and solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude
material was purified by flash column chromatography (1:1 hexane/
ethyl acetate) to afford product 11 (270 mg, 63%) as a yellow solid:
UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 305 nm (14.1 mM−1 cm−1). 1H NMR (DMSO-
d6, 70 °C) δ 1.09 (t, J = 7.00 Hz, 3H), 1.88 (broad, 2H), 3.40 (t, J =
6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.65 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 2H), 3.90 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 3.94−
4.01 (m, 4H), 4.06 (s, 3H), 7.29 (s, 1H), 8.68 (s, 1H). 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6, 70 °C) δ 14.92, 25.54, 44.20, 45.59, 50.13, 50.56, 58.49,
61.28, 120.00, 125.28, 129.30, 133.03, 154.48, 157.90. Anal.
(C15H20N6O9) C, H, N.
Formulated Prodrug Stability Studies. First, 490 μL of 2.25%
Pluronic P123 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was aliquoted into
glass HPLC vials and maintained at 50 °C. To this solution, 10 μL of
50 mM prodrug in DMSO was added and maintained at 50 °C for 10
min. Then a glutathione stock solution (40 mM) was prepared in 0.1
M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. To 800 μL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer in a
glass HPLC vial, 100 μL of glutathione stock solution and 100 μL of
formulated prodrug were added. The disappearance of the prodrug
was monitored using an Agilent 1100 series HPLC fitted with a C-18
reverse phase column (Phenomenex Luna 250 mm × 4.60 mm)
operating at 300 nm and run isocratically with acetonitrile:water
(75:25).
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
General. Starting materials were purchased from Aldrich Chemical
Co. (Milwaukee, WI) unless otherwise indicated. 2,4-Dinitro-5-
fluorotoluene was purchased from Oakwood Products, Inc., West
Columbia, SC. NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian UNITY
INOVA spectrometer; chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per
million (ppm) downfield from tetramethylsilane. The NMR spectra of
compounds 7 and 11 were recorded at 70 °C in DMSO-d6. Ultraviolet
(UV) spectra were recorded on an Agilent model 8453 or a Hewlett-
Packard model 8451A diode array spectrophotometer. Elemental
analyses were performed by Midwest Microlab (Indianapolis, IN).
Chromatography was performed on a Biotage SP1 flash purification
system. Prepacked silica gel flash chromatography columns were
purchased from Silicycle (Quebec City, Canada). Compounds 1−43,
83, and 109 were prepared using reported methods. All the new
compounds were found to be >95% pure as determined by NMR,
elemental analyses, and HPLC.
O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-methylphenyl) 1-[(4-Ethoxycarbonyl)-
piperazin-1-yl]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (6) (JS-55−111). A sol-
ution of 3 (543 mg, 2.5 mmol) in 10 mL of DMSO was stirred at
room temperature. A solution of 5 (500 mg, 2.5 mmol) in 5 mL of
DMSO was added through a syringe. The solution turned green upon
addition and faded to yellow gradually. The solution was stirred at
room temperature for 72 h, flooded with 25 mL of ice−water, and
extracted with ether. The organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate
and filtered through a layer of anhydrous magnesium sulfate.
Evaporation of the solvent gave a yellow solid that was recrystallized
from ether−petroleum ether to give compound 6 (409 mg). The
aqueous/DMSO layer was allowed to stand overnight, producing an
additional 181 mg of product 6 (total yield: 64%). mp 81−83 °C; UV
(ethanol) λmax (ε) 252 nm (12.2 mM−1 cm−1), λmax (ε) 290 nm (11.6
Cell Culture and Proliferation Assay. Cell lines derived from
human nonsmall cell lung cancers were obtained from American Type
Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and are designated by their
NCI numbers. Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco,
Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum
(Gemini Bio-Products, Sacramento, CA), 100 U/mL penicillin/
streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
1
mM−1 cm−1). H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.29 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 2.75 (s,
3H), 3.60−3.63 (m, 4H), 3.72−3.75 (m, 4H), 4.19 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H)
7.44 (s, 1H), 8.78 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 14.62, 21.61, 42.24,
50.68, 62.08, 120.70, 123.05, 123.85, 141.94, 151.89, 155.01. Anal.
(C14H18N6O8) C, H, N.
O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-methylphenyl) 1-[(4-Ethoxycarbonyl)-
homopiperazin-1-yl]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (7) (RN-2−45).
To a solution of 4 (254 mg, 1.0 mmol) in 5 mL of DMSO was added a
solution of 5 (200 mg, 1.0 mmol) in 1 mL of DMSO at room
temperature. After 12 h, reaction was quenched with ice−water and
extracted with ether. The combined organic layer was dried over
anhydrous sodium sulfate, and solvent was evaporated under reduced
For proliferation assays, cells were seeded at 2 × 104 /well in 96-
well plates, allowed to adhere for 24 h, and then were treated with the
drug or DMSO as a control for 48 h. Final concentration of DMSO
did not exceed 0.1%. Compounds were prepared as 10 mM stock
solution in DMSO (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Increasing drug
concentrations in 10 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were
7756
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm2004128|J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 7751−7758