8062
G.-J. Kim et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 8059–8062
Table 2. Effects of base and ruthenium source on asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of propiophenone with 2-propanol
Entry
Ligand
Base
Ru(II)
Temp. (°C)
Time (h)
Conv.a (%)
% eea
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
4a
4a
4a
4a
4a
9a
9b
KOH
Na–isopropoxide
NaOH
NaOH
NaOH
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
82
82
25
82
82
82
82
3
1
6
3
3
3
3
\98
\98
No reaction
\98
\98
67
66
–
67
53
74
67
NaOH
NaOH
\98
85
a Ruthenium source; A=RuCl2(PPh3)3, B=[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2, S/Ru/L mole ratio=50/1/1.5.
nes and their application to asymmetric catalysis are
underway in our laboratory.
hydrogenated product of propiophenone with 86% ee
(entry 10), whereas that obtained from N,N%-dibenzyldi-
amine compound (4c) affords 75% ee (entry 12). The
phosphino imidazolidine (7) catalyzed the reduction of
propiophenone in 2-propanol to afford the correspond-
ing alcohol in 85% ee.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grant No. 2000-1-30700-
002-3 from the Basic Research Program of the Korea
Science & Engineering Foundation.
The reaction rate was relatively slow and the values of
ee% decreased with the prolonged reaction time, when
the substrate/Ru complex ratio was high (entries 3 and
4). As can be seen in Table 1, the higher enantioselec-
tivity was obtained when 2 mol% ruthenium source and
3 mol% ligand were employed. The high enantiomeric
excess of product was maintained consistently through-
out the reaction until completion in our system. The
preformed complex catalyst prepared by the reaction of
RuCl2(PPh3)3 and ligands 5a–9b in dry toluene showed
distinctly improved reactivity. With respect to reaction
rates, the rate obtained on the preformed catalyst was
about 20 times faster than that obtained over the
catalyst prepared in situ.
References
1. (a) Spogliarich, R.; Zassinovich, G.; Kaspar, J.; Graziani,
M. J. Mol. Catal. 1982, 16, 359; (b) Zassinovich, G.;
Mestroni, G.; Gladiali, S. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1051; (c)
de Graauw, C. F.; Peters, J. A.; van Bekkum, P. H.;
Huskens, J. Synthesis 1994, 1007.
2. (a) Watanabe, Y.; Ohta, T.; Tsuji, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1982, 55, 2441; (b) Brunner, H.; Leitner, W. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1990, 387, 209.
3. (a) Hashiguchi, S.; Fujii, A.; Takehara, J.; Ikariya, T.;
Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7562; (b) Langer,
T.; Helmchen, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 1381; (c)
Pu¨ntener, K.; Schwink, L.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 8165; (d) Mu¨ller, D.; Umbricht, G.; Weber, B.;
Pfaltz, A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1991, 74, 232.
4. (a) Uematsu, N.; Fujii, A.; Hashiguchi, S.; Ikariya, T.;
Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4916; (b)
Mashima, K.; Abe, T.; Tani, K. Chem. Lett. 1998, 1199;
(c) Mashima, K.; Abe, T.; Tani, K. Chem. Lett. 1998,
2101.
The effects of ruthenium and base source on the selec-
tivity were investigated and the results are summarized
in Table 2. The chiral Ru complexes were prepared in
situ by heating a mixture of Ru(II) source and chiral
dimethyl cyclohexane diamine derivatives ligand. A
model reaction using propiophenone showed that the
combined system consisting of RuCl2(PPh3)3 and lig-
ands 4a–9b gave slightly higher enantioselectivities than
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2. In addition, the rate of reaction
was influenced by the source of base. Sodium isopro-
poxide played improved roles for reactivity, while the
enantioselectivity was independent on the kinds of base.
5. (a) Chowdhury, R. L.; Backvall, J.-E. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1991, 1, 1063; (b) Yang, H.; Alvarez, M.;
Lugan, N.; Mathieu, R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1995, 1721.
In conclusion, ruthenium complexes of chiral phosphi-
noimidazolidines have been demonstrated to catalyze
the transfer hydrogenation of alkyl aryl ketones
efficiently to give secondary alcohols of high enan-
tiomeric purity. Further synthesis of chiral imidazolidi-
6. Ohkuma, T.; Ooka, H.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10417.
7. Morimoto, T.; Tachibana, K.; Achiwa, K. Synlett 1997,
783.
8. Hach, V. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 293.