A Copper(II) Triflate-Catalyzed Tandem Friedel–Crafts Alkylation/Cyclization Process
spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV-400 instrument
(400 MHz).
arenes present in the reaction mixture, cinnamyl chlo-
ride alone, in the presence of Cu(OTf)2 catalyst in
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
CH2Cl2, generated the cyclicized product (1,2-diphen-
yl-3-chloromethylcyclopentene). The isolated product
was believed to be derived from the intermolecular
reaction between two cinnamyl chloride molecules
(see Supporting Information). No such cyclic dimer
Typical Synthetic Procedure (Table 2, entry 1)
1 mmol of 1 (134 mg), 1.1 mmol of cinnamyl chloride 4
(151 mg) and 0.05 mmol of Cu
ACHTUNGRTEN(NUGN OTf)2 ( 18 mg) were added
into a reaction vial with 5 mL CH2Cl2 in a glove box. The re-
was observed when arenes were present in the reac- action vial was capped and taken out, heated to 608C and
kept stirring for 16 h. Then, the reaction mixture was cooled
to room temperature and diluted with CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and
water (15 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with
CH2Cl2 (10 mLꢁ2). The combined organic layer was dried
(MgSO4), and concentrated. The pure product was obtained
through flash silica gel column chromatography of the resi-
due using hexane as the eluent.
tion mixture.
This reaction protocol was then extended to other
substrates. As expected, most of substituted benzenes
were active in this reaction to give the corresponding
dihydroindenes in moderate to good yields, Table 2.
As shown in entries 1–6, bis-, tris- and tetrakis-
methyl-substituted benzenes reacted with cinnamyl
chloride to form the desired products in good yield.
There were no methyl migration steps involved in the
reaction of substrates 9, 11, 13 and 15. From the
mechanism discussion of substrate 1 we know that the
methyl migration step is much slower than final cycli-
zation step. Here reactions of arenes 9, 11, 13 and 15
would prefer go through a direct cyclization. Almost
no reaction was observed between 1,3,5-trimethylben-
zene and cinnamyl chloride under similar conditions.
The same reaction was also found to be efficient for
substituted phenols, (entries 7 and 8). A very good
yield of 20 was obtained when the reaction was car-
ried out with substrate 19, indicating that the methyl
migration step must have occurred. Reactions be-
tween 3,3-dimethylallyl bromide and arenes were also
examined, and similar cycloaddition products 21–26
were obtained (Table 2, entries 9–14).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Institute of Bioengineering
and Nanotechnology (Biomedical Research Council, Agency
for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore).
References
[1] a) D. B. Saxena, Phytochemistry 1986, 25, 553; b) W. M.
Welch, A. R. Kraska, R. Sarges, B. K. Kow, J. Med.
Chem. 1984, 27, 1508; c) W.-H. Lin, J.-M. Fang, Y.-S.
Cheng, Phytochemistry 1995, 40, 871; d) K. Kawazoe,
M. Yamamoto, Y. Takaishi, G. Honda, T. Fujita, E.
Sezik, E. Yesilada, Phytochemistry 1999, 50, 493; e) H.
Ohtsu, M. Iwamoto, H. Ohishi, S. Matsunaga, R.
Tanaka, Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6419.
In conclusion, a one-pot CuACHTNUGTRENUNG(OTf)2-catalyzed syn-
thesis of dihydroindenes from substituted benzenes
and cinnamyl chloride has been developed. The final
acid-catalyzed cyclization not only achieved the struc-
turally important dihydroindene skeleton, it was also
the key contribution in promoting the preceding aro-
matic alkylation step and methyl migration step in a
smooth manner under the relatively mild condition,
both of which were considered to be very challenging
by themselves. This efficient method can be applied
to the synthesis of a variety of indane skeletons or
benzo-fused carbocycles.
[2] H. Gao, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, R. Garg, C. Hansch,
Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 723.
[3] a) S. R. Angle, D. O. Arnaiz, J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
5937; b) J. Ipaktschi, G. Lauterbauch, Angew. Chem.
1986, 98, 346; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25,
354.
[4] a) R. Deng, L. Sun, Z. Li, Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5207;
b) D. L. J. Clive, R. Sunasee, Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2677;
c) K. Yoshida, H. Takahashi, T. Imamoto, Chem. Eur. J.
2008, 14, 8246; d) W. F. Bailey, S. C. Longstaff, J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 432.
[5] R. B. Woodward, T. R. Hoye, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977,
99, 8007.
[6] A. S. Kende, K. Koch, A. C. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988, 110, 2210.
[7] a) G. A. Olah, Friedel–Crafts Chemistry, Wiley-Inter-
science, New York, 1973; b) H. Heaney, in: Compre-
hensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 2, (Eds.: B. M. Trost, I.
Fleming), Pergamon, Oxford, 1991, p 733.
[8] a) S. R. Angle, M. S. Louie, J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
2853; b) R. K. Thalji, K. A. Ahrendt, R. G. Bergman,
J. A. Ellman, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6775; c) G. K. S.
Prakash, P. Yan, B. Torok, G. A. Olah, Catal. Lett.
2003, 87, 109; d) T. Lomberget, E. Bentz, D. Bouyssi,
G. Balme, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2055.
Experimental Section
All solvents and chemicals were used as received from com-
mercial suppliers, unless otherwise noted. Dry solvents and
a glove box (Argon Innovative Technologies, Inc.) were
used for the set-up of reactions. Gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses were performed on a Shi-
madzu GCMS QP2010 system, while gas chromatography
(GC) analyses were conducted on an Agilent GC6890N
system. 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 1055 – 1060
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1059