[
S.V. Goswami et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 24 (2013) 422–424
423
B(OH)2
Cl
CH3
Table 1
Optimization of the solvent and catalytic loading for the one-pot synthesis of 3-
aminoalkylated indoles.a
CH3
Ar
HN
N
R
[DT$LINE]
R
+ Ar-CHO +
Cl
CH3CN, rt
N
H
N
H
1
2
3
4a-l
B(OH)2
Cl
CH3
CH3
CHO
HN
N
Scheme 1. One-pot synthesis of 3-aminoalkyalted indoles.
+
+
N
H
Solvent, r.t.
N
H
crude product. The crude mixture was purified with silica gel
column chromatography.
Cl
4a
1
2
3
N-[(4-Chlorophenyl)(1H-indol-3-yl)methyl]-N-methyl benzene-
amine (4a): 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
2H, J = 4.4 Hz), 7.05–7.16 (m, 6H), 6.90 (d, 4H, J = 7.8 Hz), 6.50 (d,
2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 5.63 (s, 1H), 2.90 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3):
d 7.86 (s, 1H), 7.43 (d,
Entry
Solvent
3-Chlorophenylboronic
acid (mol%)
Time (h)
Yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Methanol
10
10
10
10
5
22
20
16
26
22
15
12
30
65
70
76
46
58
81
90
40
d
22.3, 30.8, 43.5, 110.8, 115.0, 120.0, 121.1, 121.8, 124.6, 128.0,
Ethanol
129.1, 129.5, 129.9, 133.4, 136.5, 139.0, 142.4, 149.0; Mass (LC/
MS): m/z 346.5365 (M+); Anal. Calcd. for C22H19ClN2: C 76.18, H
5.52, N 8.08 Found: C 76.15, H 5.55, N 8.10.
N-[(5-Bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)(p-tolyl)methyl]-N-methylbenzen-
amine (4k): 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
d 10.31 (s, 1H), 7.35 (d, 1H,
Acetonitrile
Chloroform
Acetonitrile
Acetonitrile
Acetonitrile
Acetonitrile
15
20
0
J = 7.8 Hz), 7.20 (d, 2H, J = 4.2 Hz), 7.04–7.10 (m, 4H), 6.68 (d, 2H,
J = 4.2 Hz), 6.52 (d, 2H, J = 4.0 Hz), 6.34 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.51(s,
a
Conditions: indole (1 mmol), 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (1 mmol), N-methylaniline
(2 mmol), solvent (10 mL) at room temperature. Reaction was monitored by thin
layer chromatography.
1H), 2.60 (s, 3H), 2.38 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3):
d 23.4,
b
Isolated yield.
35.2, 49.4, 110.2, 114.6, 116.9, 120.1, 122.2, 124.4, 127.1, 128.9,
129.4, 129.7, 132.8, 136.2, 140.2, 144.5, 150.2; Mass (LC/MS): m/z
404.2365 (M+); Anal. Calcd. for C23H21BrN2: C 68.15, H 5.22, N 6.91
Found: C 68.10, H 5.24, N 6.94.
Table 2
Synthesis of 3-amino-alkylated indole derivatives.a
N-[(4-Chlorophenyl)(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl]-N-methyl
benzenamine (4l): 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
d
7.62 (s, 1H), 7.21–
7.30 (m, 4H), 7.05 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 6.52–6.96 (m, 6H), 5.89 (s, 1H),
3.70 (s, 3H), 2.96 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3):
24.2, 34.2,
Entry
R
Ar
Product Time (h) Mp (oC)
Yield (%)b
1
2
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Br
Br
4-Cl–C6H4
C6H5
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
12
182–184 90
d
14
188–190 80
139–141 87
135–137 84
176–178 91
131–133 82
135–138 86
190–192 88
3
4-OH–C6H4
4-CH3–C6H4
4-OCH3–C6H4
12
45.6, 59.3, 106.2, 113.0, 116.3, 119.8, 122.9, 126.3, 128.0, 128.8,
130.2, 132.03, 136.2, 144.2, 149.6, 157.1; Mass (LC/MS): m/z
377.4236 (M+); Anal. Calcd. for C23H21ClN2O: C 73.30, H 5.62, N
7.43 Found: C 73.34, H 5.59, N 7.39.
4
12.5
14
5
6
3,4-(OCH3)2–C6H3 4f
14
7
3-OCH3–C6H4
3-NO2–C6H4
1-Naphthyl
C6H5
4g
4h
4i
12
8
13
9
14
82–85
86
3. Results and discussion
10
11
12
4j
12.5
12
210–212 88
196–198 90
204–206 87
4-CH3–C6H4
4k
4l
In continuation of our interest in the synthesis of heterocycles
[20–22] and organic transformation [23] in the presence of
catalytic amounts of arylboronic acids, herein we describe the
synthesis of 3-aminoalkylated indoles via one-pot, three-compo-
nent coupling reaction of an aromatic aldehyde, N-methyl aniline
and indole in presence of 3-chlorophenylboronic acid as a catalyst
in acetonitrile at room temperature conditions. Initially, we
studied optimization of suitable solvent and catalytic loading for
the model reaction of 4-chlorobenzaldehyde, N-methyl aniline and
indole at room temperature. Different solvents were screened to
test the effectiveness of 3-chlorophenylboronic acid (10 mol%) and
the results are listed in Table 1 (entries 1–8). The optimum result
was observed in acetonitrile, in which the catalyst worked most
efficiently (Table 1, entry 3). In addition, the reaction in methanol
and ethanol afforded 65% and 70% yield respectively (Table 1,
entries 1 and 2). In the non-polar solvent, chloroform desired
product was obtained in lower yields with longer reaction time
(Table 1, entry 4).
We also studied the effect of catalytic loading on the reaction in
acetonitrile solvent. It was noticed that amount of the catalyst
plays a major role in establishment of the desired product yield.
On decreasing catalytic loading of 3-chlorophenylboronic acid to
5 mol%, reaction gave low yield (58%) with extended reaction time
(Table 1, entry 5). When catalytic loading was raised to 15 mol%,
an enhanced result was observed. The reaction was completed in
15 h and offered good yield (81%) (Table 1, entry 6). The best
OMe 4-Cl–C6H4
13
a
Conditions: indole (1 mmol), aromatic aldehyde (1 mmol), N-methylaniline
(2 mmol), 3-chlorophenylboronic acid (20 mol%), acetonitrile (10 mL) at room
temperature. Reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography.
b
Isolated yield.
optimized reaction condition was achieved at the catalytic
loading 20 mol% in acetonitrile. The reaction afforded product
4a in excellent yield (90%) within 12 h (Table 1, entry 7). The
model reaction in the absence of the catalyst in acetonitrile
showed poor performance with respect to the yield and reaction
time. When the reaction stirred for 30 h, it afforded only 40% yield
(Table 1, entry 8).
To examine the scope and generality of this protocol, we have
used different substituted aldehydes and indoles to afford
corresponding 3-aminoalkylated indole in high yields. The results
are summarized in Table 2 (entries 1–12). Benzaldehydes having
both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups were
used and afforded the desired products in high yields.
A plausible mechanism is proposed in Scheme 2. We assume
that when N-methylaniline is reacted with aromatic aldehyde in
the presence of 3-chlorophenylboronic acid, an iminium ion
intermediate II is formed. An imminium ion is then attacked by
an electron rich indole to get the desired 3-aminoalkylated
indole 4.