Support from the EPSRC (Leadership Fellowship to
JHRT), Advantage West Midlands, the University of
Birmingham, Peter Ashton (mass spectrometry) and Graham
Burns (HPLC) is gratefully acknowledged.
Notes and references
y Mixtures of targets (e.g. a 50 : 50 mixture of 8 and 11 with probe 6)
gave an additive fluorescent response which approximated to the
percentage composition of the mixture.
z An analogous probe to 5 with a L-threoninol unit has a much
smaller fluorescence quantum yield of 0.018, which indicates that the
stereochemistry of the linker has a strong bearing on the position of
the anthracene probe with respect to the DNA backbone.
8 Preliminary fluorescence lifetime studies indicate that several probes
and their duplexes give triexponential emission profiles, which suggests
that the emission behaviour of each system is governed by a rather
intricate interplay between various decay pathways. The results of a
detailed study will be published in due course.
Fig. 3 Titration showing the effect on the anthracene emission
intensity at 426 nm of forming duplexes 6ꢁ8 (purple, top) and 6ꢁ11
(orange, bottom), ca. 293 K, lex = 360 nm).
1 S. Kim and A. Misra, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2007, 9, 289.
2 (a) D. J. Kleinbaum and E. T. Kool, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46,
8154 and references therein; (b) D. M. Kolpashchikov, Chem. Rev.,
2010, 110, 4709; (c) R. T. Ranasinghe and T. Brown, Chem.
Commun., 2005, 5487.
3 (a) R. W. Sinkeldam, N. J. Greco and Y. Tor, Chem. Rev., 2010,
110, 2579; (b) D. W. Dodd and R. H. E. Hudson, Mini-Rev. Org.
Chem., 2009, 6, 378; (c) Y. Xie, T. Maxson and Y. Tor, Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 5053 and references therein; (d) P. Cekan
and S. T. Sigurdsson, Chem. Commun., 2008, 3393 and references
therein; (e) N. Moran, D. M. Bassani, J.-P. Desvergne, S. Keiper,
P. A. S. Lowden, J. S. Vyle and J. H. R. Tucker, Chem. Commun.,
2006, 5003; (f) A. Okamoto, Y. Saito and I. Saito, J. Photochem.
Photobiol., C, 2005, 6, 108 and references therein; (g)
J.-L. H. A. Duprey, D. M. Bassani, E. I. Hyde, C. Ludwig,
A. Rodger, J. S. Vyle, J. Wilkie, Z. Zhao and J. H. R. Tucker,
Supramol. Chem., 2011, 23, 273.
than probe 6, as evidenced by fluorescence quantum yields
(FF = 0.053 and 0.011 respectively). This indicates that the
geometry of the short and relatively inflexible linker found in 5
precludes a significant quenching interaction with proximate
DNA bases,z which are known to quench the fluorescence of
anthracene derivatives.11 However duplex formation with 5
results in a general decrease in emission in all cases. Therefore
it appears that duplex formation per se, and the formation of
the B-DNA structure (shown by CD spectroscopy) dictates the
overall change in emission intensity for this probe, which
results in the probe being relatively insensitive to changes in
sequence in the target strand. In the case of probe 6 however,
clearly the identity of the base opposite the anthracene is the
dominant factor governing the emission profile of each duplex.
Overall, the results are consistent with the longer linker length
rendering the anthracene less emissive to begin with while
allowing it to interact more fully with the base pair stack. The
greater interaction raises the duplex melting temperature
(Table 2) and also makes the anthracene more sensitive to
local changes in the base environment. Previous work has
shown that various bases are able to quench the excited state
of organic fluorophores to a greater or lesser extent.12 Adenine
is generally the least effective as a quencher and pyrimidines
are the most effective, a trend that is consistent with these
results.8
4 (a) N. J. Greco and Y. Tor, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 10784;
(b) N. J. Greco, R. W. Sinkeldam and Y. Tor, Org. Lett., 2009, 11,
1115.
5 (a) L. S. Kristensen, H. M. Nielsen and L. L. Hansen, Eur. J.
Pharmacol., 2009, 625, 131; (b) M. Ehrlich, Epigenomics, 2009, 1,
239; (c) E. A. Vucic, C. J. Brown and W. L. Lam, Pharmaco-
genomics, 2008, 9, 215; (d) For a recent special issue on epigenetics,
see A. Jeltsch and W. Fischle, ChemBioChem, 2011, 12, 183.
6 (a) L. S. Kristensen and L. L. Hansen, Clin. Chem., 2009, 55, 1471;
(b) F. Feng, H. Wang, L. Han and S. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 11338.
7 (a) Y. Yu, S. Blair, D. Gillespie, R. Jensen, D. Myszka,
A. H. Badran, I. Ghosh and A. Chagovetz, Anal. Chem., 2010,
82, 5012; (b) M. Ogino, Y. Taya and K. Fujimoto, Org. Biomol.
Chem., 2009, 7, 3163.
8 For two recent electrochemical approaches, see: (a) S. Liu, P. Wu,
W. Li, H. Zhang and C. Cai, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 2844;
(b) P. Wang, Z. Mai, Z. Dai and X. Zou, Chem. Commun., 2010,
46, 7781.
9 H. Kashida, X. Liang and H. Asanuma, Curr. Org. Chem., 2009,
13, 1065 and references therein.
In conclusion, these results demonstrate how a simple
fluorophore-tagged DNA strand can act as both a base-
discriminating probe and a signaller of an epigenetic change
(in this case signalling a site associated with hypomethylation),
illustrating the versatility of this direct approach to DNA
sensing. Further studies are now planned to rationalise these
results further and to assess the scope of these findings through
the targeting of particular base sequences in the human
genome.
10 Y. Molard, D. M. Bassani, J.-P. Desvergne, N. Moran and J. H.
R. Tucker, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 8523.
11 C. V. Kumar, E. H. A. Punzalan and W. B. Tan, Tetrahedron,
2000, 56, 7027 and references therein.
12 M. Manoharan, K. L. Tivel, M. Zhao, K. Nafisi and T. L. Netzel,
J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 17461.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6629–6631 6631