and co-workers is another successful example.6 Many
other heterocycle-based modules were also described.7
To address the tautomeric problem often associated with
the heterocycle modules, different types of the hydrogen-
bonding motifs were designed.8 For example, the aromatic
oligoamideduplexesweredevelopedbyGong etal.,9 which
are free of the complication from unfavorable tautomer-
ism. Other duplexes based on amide units were described
by Nowick10 and Hunter.11 In addition, molecular du-
plexes based on hydrazide and amidourea motifs were
reported by Li et al.12 and Chen et al.13 Recently, we
reported with collaborators oligoamide hydrogen-bonding
duplexes as organogelators and an alternative strategy for
tuning the association specificity by varying the spacings
between neighboring hydrogens based on incorporation of
naphthalene-based residues.14
So far the hydrogen-bonded association modules with
respect to nonheterocycles include those based on amide,
urea, hydrazide, and amidourea moieties. Use of the
combination of imide and urea units as building blocks
for constructing duplexes has still been unexplored. With
increasing interest in supramolecular materials fabricated
with multiple hydrogen-bonding modules, the design of
molecular hydrogen-bonded duplexes that are structurally
simple, synthetically readily accessible, and of high and
tunable association ability still represents an urgent need.
hydrogen bonding interactions (Figure 1). The high stabi-
lity is attributed to the preorganization of intramolecular
three-center hydrogen bonds and the substituent effect.
Compounds 4 and 5 are designed for comparison. This
work shown here demonstrated a new type of molecular
duplexes based on the combination of imide and urea units
that are readily accessible via a simple synthetic strategy.
Since the imide units in our designed molecules serve as
hydrogen-bond acceptors it is important to orient its
carbonyl oxygens to the same side. Among the three
possible conformational isomers, the transꢀtrans form is
preferred to align the acceptor atoms for hydrogen bond-
ing interactions (Figure 2a). Thus, compound 6 was de-
signed and synthesized first to examine the possibility of
preorganizing the imide structure along one edge of the
molecule. The presence of an intramolecular three-center
hydrogen bond in 6 ensures the rigidification of the back-
bone and helps circumvent the possible intermolecular
hydrogen bonding interactions from the upper edge.
Figure 2. (a) Conformational isomerization and the transꢀtrans
conformer of imide 6 fixed with a three-center H-bond; (b)
X-ray structure of 6 with hydrogen-bond geometry and torsion
angles denoted. For clarity, only hydrogen atoms involved in
H-bonds are shown.
(7) For selected examples, see: (a) Lafitte, V. G. H.; Aliev, A. E.;
Horton, P. N.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Bala, K.; Golding, P.; Hailes, H. C. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6544–6545. (b) Schmuck, C.; Wienand, W. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 452–459. (c) Blight, B. A.; Camara-Campos,
A.; Djurdjevic, S.; Kaller, M.; Leigh, D. A.; McMillan, F. M.; McNab,
H.; Slawin, A. M. Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14116–14122. (d)
Baruah, P. K.; Gonnade, R.; Phalgune, U. D.; Sanjayan, G. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 6461–6467. (e) Hisamatsu, Y.; Shirai, N.; Ikeda, S.;
Odashima, K. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4342–4345.
Figure 1. Imide-urea strands 1ꢀ3 that pair into self-complemen-
tary duplexes A A via bifurcated hydrogen bonds. Compounds
3
4 and 5 are designed for comparison.
(8) For selected examples, see: (a) Corbin, P. S.; Zimmerman, S. C. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3779–3780. (b) Corbin, P. S.; Zimmerman,
S. C.; Thiessen, P. A.; Hawryluk, N. A.; Murray, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 10475–10488. (c) Moriuchi, T.; Tamura, T.; Hirao, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9356–9357.
(9) (a) Gong, B.; Yan, Y. F.; Zeng, H. Q.; Skrzypczak-Jankunn, E.;
Kim, Y. W.; Zhu, J.; Ickes, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5607–5068.
(b) Zeng, H. Q.; Miller, R. S.; Flowers, R. A.; Gong, B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 2635–2644.
Herein we report on a new class of DDAA self-comple-
mentary imide-urea modules 1ꢀ3 that have a high dimer-
ization constant (Kdim > 105 Mꢀ1 in CDCl3) via bifurcated
hydrogen bonds involving both conventional and weak
(10) Nowick, J. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1319–1330.
(5) (a) Folmer, B. J. B.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Versteegen, R. M.; vander
Rijt, J. A. J.; Meijer, E. W. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 874–878. (b) Abbel, R.;
Grenier, C.; Pouderoijen, M. J.; Stouwdam, J. W.; Leclere, P. E. L. G.;
Sijbesma, R. P.; Meijer, E. W.; Schenning, A. P. H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 833–843. (c) Kushner, A. M.; Vossler, J. D.; Williams, G. A;
Guan, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8766–8768.
(6) Blight, B. A.; Hunter, C. A.; Leigh, D. A.; McNab, H.; Thomson,
P. I. T. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 244–248.
(11) Bisson, A. P.; Carver, F. J.; Eggleston, D. S.; Haltiwanger, R. C.;
Hunter, C. A.; Livingstone, D. L.; McCabe, J. F.; Rotger, C.; Rowan,
A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8856–8868.
(12) (a) Zhao, X.; Wang, X.-Z.; Jiang, X.-K.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Li, Z.-T.;
Chen, G.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15128–15139. (b) Zhu, J.; Lin,
J.-B.; Xu, Y.-X.; Shao, X.-B.; Jiang, X.-K.; Li, Z.-T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 12307–12313.
ꢁ
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 17, 2011
4629