This alkaloid displays a complex pentacyclic conforma-
tionally rigid skeleton due to the cis-relationship of the
three contiguous stereocenters in the cyclohexyl ring at
C-7, C-21 and C-20. Owing to the challenge associated
with the construction of these structural frame works
including a quaternary carbon center, extensive synthetic
efforts have been made to obtain 1 both in racemic6 as well
as in optically pure form.7 Majority of these approaches
have relied on intramolecular DielsꢀAlder (DA) type
cycloaddition reaction of a biogenetically postulated seco-
dine intermediate.8 However, auxiliary controlled or chiral
substrate controlled cycloaddition of secodine intermedi-
ate have generally led to the formation of mixture of
diastereomers.7b
The synthetic design of crucial precursor 4 was visua-
lized through Birch reduction-alkylation of the chiral
nicotinic acid derivative 8. Although enantioselective con-
struction of all carbon quaternary stereocenter in the
cyclohexane ring employing Birch reduction-alkylation
of benzoic acid derivatives9 is known, to the best of our
knowledge, no report is found for similar transformation
for generating substituted piperidine system.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 11
In an effort to develop a nonbiogenetic route to 1 in
optically pure form, we looked at the problem entirely
from a different angle and devised a cascade strategy as
outlined retrosynthetically in Scheme 1. This strategy was
envisioned to provide two new rings, two new stereogenic
centers and three new sigma bonds in a single operation
through the sequential involvement of reactive intermedi-
ates 6 and 7. We are happy to disclose herein our successful
endeavor of accomplishing the total synthesis of (þ)-1 in
overall 4% yield and >99% ee.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis
On the simple premise that Birchreduction-alkylation of
8, obtained by the reaction of 2-chloronicotininc acid and
(S)-prolinol, followed by simple chemical transformation
would give 4, we subjected 8 to Birch reduction-alkylation
at ꢀ78 °C using ethyl iodide, but to our utter surprise,
it gave the expected product only in ∼6% yield. Therefore,
we used more electrophillic allyl bromide for alkyla-
tion reaction and succeeded in getting 9 in 46% yield
(de= 97.9%).10a Single crystallization in dichloromethane-
n-pentaneafforded9 as(colorlesscrystals, mp 105ꢀ106 °C)
a single diastereomer. The stereochemistry of 9 was con-
firmed unambiguously through X-ray crystallographic
analysis.10b The excellent diastereoselectivity in the forma-
tion of 9, presumably, results from the involvement of
rigid molecular architecture of enolate intermediate where
proline stereocenter directs the alkylation preferentially
at β-face.
(6) (a) Ziegler, F. E.; Bennett, B. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 7458.
(b) Kozmin, S. A.; Rawal, V. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 13523. (c)
Takano, S.; Hatakeyama, S.; Ogasawara, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979,
101, 6414. (d) Kuehne, M. E.; Roland, D. M.; Hafter, R. J. Org. Chem.
1978, 43, 3705. (e) Kuehne, M. E.; Matsko, T. H.; Bohnert, J. C.;
Kikemo, C. L. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 1063. (f) Barsi, M. C.; Das, B. C.;
Fourrey, J. L.; Sundaramoorthi, R. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1985,
88. (g) Kobayashi, S.; Peng, G.; Fukuyama, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 1519. (h) Kuehne, M. E.; Wang, T.; Seaton, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 6001. (i) Kalaus, G.; Greiner, I.; Kajtar-Peredy, M.; Brlik, J.; Szabo,
L.; Szantay, C. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1434. (j) Kutney, J. P.; Chan,
K. K.; Failli, A.; Fromson, J. M.; Gletsos, C.; Nelson, V. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 3891. (k) Coldham, I; Burrell, A. J. M.; White,
L. E.; Adams, H.; Oram, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6159. (l)
Laronze, J.-Y.; Laronze-Fontaine, J.; Levy, J.; Le Men, J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1974, 15, 491.
Our initial attempt to remove chiral auxiliary from 9
by stirring with a mixture of 80% H2SO4/MeOH (1:8) gave
(9) (a) Schultz, A. G.; Macielag, M.; Sundararaman, P.; Taveras,
A. G.; Welch, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7828. (b) Donohoe, T. J.;
McRiner, A. J.; Helliwell, M.; Sheldrake, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin.
Trans. 1 2001, 1435.
(10) (a) Diastereomeric excess of 9 was measured by HPLC analysis
using Atlantis RP-18 column, CH3CN/H2O (40:60), λ = 224 nm. (b)
CCDC 783953 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for 9.
(c) Enantiomeric purity of 11 was determined by HPLC using Chiralcel
OD-H column; i-PrOH/petroleum ether (10:90) as eluent, λ = 220 nm.
(7) (a) Kuehne, M. E.; Podhorez, D. E. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 924.
(b) Kuehne, M. E.; Bandarage, U. K.; Hammach, A.; Li, Y. L.; Wang, T.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2172. (c) Yuan, Z. Q.; Ishikawa, H.; Boger, D. L.
Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 741.
(8) (a) Scott, A. I. Acc. Chem. Res. 1970, 3, 151. (b) Scott, A. I. Bioorg.
Chem. 1974, 3, 398.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 17, 2011
4673