Application of Bis(carbazolyl)benzodifuran in a Blue Phosphorescent OLED
12 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, the resulting mixture was
passed through a short pad of Florisil column with dichloromethane, and
the crude material was purified by flash column chromatography on
silica gel (n-hexane/toluene (90:10 to 70:30) to afford the title compound
as a white solid (736 mg, 1.10 mmol, 61%). M.p.: 3328C (TG-DTA).
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d=2.74 (s, 6H, CH3), 7.32 (dd, J=8.1 Hz,
8.1 Hz, 4H, carbazole), 7.46 (dd, J=8.1 Hz, 8.1 Hz, 4H, carbazole), 7.55
(d, J=8.0 Hz, 4H, carbazole), 7.58 (s, 2H, benzodifuran), 7.73 (d, J=
8.6 Hz, 4H, phenylene), 7.81 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 4H, phenylene), 8.18 ppm (d,
J=8.0 Hz, 4H, carbazole); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d=13.1, 109.8,
114.3, 117.2, 120.0, 120.4, 123.4, 126.0, 126.3, 127.4, 130.3, 132.0, 136.6,
138.6, 140.8, 151.0 ppm. Anal. Calcd (%) for C48H32N2O2: C 86.20,
H 4.82, N 4.19. Found: C 86.03, H 5.00, N 4.00. MS (APCI+): 669 [M+1].
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Yoshiharu Sato for helpful discussion on PHOLED, and
Rigaku Corporation for data collection on VariMax with RAPID and the
structure analysis of MeCZBDFs. We are grateful to the MEXT for fi-
nancial support (KAKENHI for E.N., No. 22000008, H.T. No. 20685005)
and the Global COE Program for Chemistry Innovation. This work was
partly supported by the Strategic Promotion of Innovative R&D, JST.
C.M. thanks the JSPS for the Research Fellowship for Young Scientists
(No. 21·9262).
Figure 3. Energy diagram of the materials (in eV). The emissive layer is
surrounded by a broken line, and the dopant and two different hosts are
shown inside. a) Green-emitting devices C and D, and b) blue-emitting
devices E and F.
device F, which utilized mCP as a host, device E showed a
lower driving voltage (7.3 V, c.f. 9.1 V for device F). This
smaller driving voltage can be largely attributed to the
higher carrier mobility of o-MeCZBDF than that of mCP[16]
because the carrier confinement within the dopant is effec-
tive for both host materials (Figure 3b). The power efficien-
cy of device E (3.2 lmWÀ1) was higher than device F
(2.1 lmWÀ1), at a luminance of 1000 cdmÀ2, whilst the
EQEmax value was comparable (5.4% for device E and
5.5% for device F).
Keywords: benzodifuran
electroluminescence · excited triplet state · semiconductors
·
cyclization
·
[1] a) K. Mꢃllen, U. Scherf, Organic Light-Emitting Devices: Synthesis
Properties and Applications, Wiley-VCH, 2006; b) J. Shinar, Organic
Light-Emitting Devices: A Survey, Springer, 2004; c) Z. Li, H. Meng,
Organic Light-Emitting Materials and Devices, CRC Press, 2007.
[2] S.-S. Sun, N. S. Sariciftci, Organic Photovoltaics: Mechanism, Materi-
als, and Devices, CRC Press, 2005.
In conclusion, we have found that benzodifuran deriva-
tives with a 14p-electron system showed not only a high ex-
cited triplet-state energy level, but also high carrier mobility
and thermal stability. Comparison with the phenanthrene
and anthracene systems suggested that the presence of the
oxygen atoms allowed us to achieve the high excitation
energy for the steric-hindrance-free, flat p-electron frame-
work that is necessary to achieve high carrier mobility. We
have demonstrated the suitability of o-MeCZBDF and
p-MeCZBDF for full-color PHOLED devices.
[3] a) M. Klessinger, J. Michl, Excited States and Photochemistry of Or-
ganic Molecules, VCH, 1995; b) R. J. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluo-
rescence Spectroscopy, Springer, 2006; c) J. N. Turro, Modern Molec-
ular Photochemistry, University Science Books, 1991; d) V. Balzani,
Electron Transfer in Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, 2001.
[4] M. A. Baldo, D. F. OꢄBrien, Y. You, A. Shoustikov, S. Sibley, M. E.
Thompson, S. R. Forrest, Nature 1998, 395, 151.
[5] a) A. B. Padmaperuma, L. S. Sapochak, P. E. Burrows, Chem. Mater.
[6] R. J. Holmes, B. W. D’Andrade, S. R. Forrest, X. Ren, J. Li, M. E.
[7] R. J. Holmes, S. R. Forrest, Y.-J. Tung, R. C. Kwong, J. J. Brown, S.
[8] H. Tsuji, C. Mitsui, L. Ilies, Y. Sato, E. Nakamura, J. Am. Chem.
Experimental Section
[10] For a traditional synthetic method of o-BDF, see: L. Renꢅ, J.-P.
Buisson, R. Royer, D. Averbeck, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1978, 13, 435–
439.
[11] a) L. R. Worden, A. W. Burgstahler, K. D. Kaufman, J. A. Weis,
Gꢇmez, L. Santana, E. Uriarte, Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 4805–4810;
Synthesis of o-MeCZBDF
A
solution of n-butyllithium in hexane (2.29 mL, 1.57 molLÀ1
,
3.60 mmol) was added to a solution of 3,6-di(1-propynyl)-1,2-benzenediol
(335 mg, 1.80 mmol) in THF (3.6 mL) at 08C. The resulting yellow sus-
pension was allowed to warm to ambient temperature and stirred for
30 min. After a solution of zinc chloride in THF (3.6 mL, 1.0 molLÀ1
,
3.6 mmol) was added, the volatile compounds were removed in vacuo,
and then toluene (3.6 mL) was added. The resulting pale-yellow solution
was heated to 1208C and stirred for 3 h at this temperature. After cooling
to ambient temperature, [Pd2ACHTNUTRGNE(UGN dba)3]·CHCl3 (186 mg, 0.18 mmol), S-Phos
(295 mg, 0.72 mol), and 4-bromophenylcarbazole (1.28 g, 3.96 mmol)
were added successively. The resulting mixture was stirred at 608C for
Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 2296 – 2300
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2299