943
I. Yavari et al.
Letter
Synlett
In addition, 1,10-phenanthroline can be used as a
unique ligand for the N-arylation with chlorobenzenes (Ta-
ble 2). However, this conversion required higher catalyst
loading (30 mol%) compared to those of aryl iodides, bro-
mides, and triflates.
A series of substituted aryl O-triflates, as shown in Table
2, was subjected to the reaction conditions described above.
Aryl O-triflates having electron-withdrawing, electron-re-
leasing, and bulky groups on the aromatic ring, afforded
moderate to good yields (Table 2).
In conclusion, we have described a novel system for the
copper-catalyzed N-arylation of diisopropyl azodicarboxyl-
ate in good to excellent yields. This system operates under
mild enough conditions and tolerates a wide array of func-
tional groups. Using this procedure iodobenzene was selec-
tively coupled with diisopropyl azodicarboxylate in the
presence of bromobenzene and benzene O-triflates.
References and Notes
(1) Dai, C.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2719.
(2) Reviews: (a) Wolfe, J. P.; Wagaw, S.; Marcoux, J.-F.; Buchwald, S.
L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 805. (b) Hartwig, J. F. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2046. (c) Muci, A. R.; Buchwald, S. L. Top. Curr.
Chem. 2002, 219, 133.
(3) Shafir, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8742.
(4) Larsson, P.; Bolm, C.; Norrby, P. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 13613.
(5) Swapna, K.; Murthy, S. N.; Nageswar, Y. V. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2010, 6678.
(6) Monguchi, Y.; Maejima, T.; Mori, S.; Maegawa, T.; Sajiki, H.
Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 7372.
(7) Terada, M.; Tsushima, D.; Nakano, M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009,
351, 2817.
(8) Katritzky, A. R.; Wu, J.; Verin, S. V. Synthesis 1995, 651.
(9) Velarde-Ortiz, R.; Guijarro, A.; Rieke, R. D. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 9157.
(10) Uemura, T.; Chatani, N. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8631.
(11) Yavari, I.; Ghazanfarpour-Darjani, M.; Ahmadian, S.; Solgi, Y.
Synlett 2011, 1745.
(12) Typical Procedure for the Preparation of Aryl Hydrazides 3
To a stirred solution of DIAD (1.2 mmol) in DMF (2 mL) at 0 °C,
NaH (0.05 g, 1.2 mmol) was added in portions over 20 min.
Then, the aryl O-triflate (1.0 mmol), LiI (134 mg, 1mmol), and
Cu2O (15 mg, 0.1 mmol) were added to the reaction mixture,
which was stirred at 80 °C for 8 h under N2. The reaction was
cooled and quenched by adding CH2Cl2 (2 mL) and sat. aq NH4Cl
(3 mL). The mixture was stirred for an additional 30 min, and
two layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted
with CH2Cl2 (3 × 2 mL), the combined organic layers were dried
over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue
was purified by chromatography (silica gel; hexane–EtOAc, 3:1)
to give the product.
Table 2 Reaction Scope for Aryl Sources
Ar
Cu2O, NaH, LiI
DMF, 70 °C
CO2i-Pr
N
N
CO2i-Pr
ArOTf
+
N
i-PrO2C
N
i-PrO2C
H
1
2
3
Entry
Ar
Ph
Product
Yield (%) of 3
1
2
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
83
80
79
72
80
70
63
81
84
67
94
79
76
1-naphthyl
4-MeC6H4
2-MeC6H4
3-MeC6H4
4-MeOC6H4
2-F3CC6H4
3-F3CC6H4
4-NCC6H4
2-O2NC6H4
4-O2NC6H4
2-thienyl
3
4
5
6
7
3g
3h
3i
8
9
10
11
12
13
3j
3k
3l
2-ClC6H4
3m
The optimized reaction conditions given above were
compatible with the presence of functional groups such as
CN, NO2, CF3, OMe, and halogens on the aromatic rings of
the aryl halides and triflates. With iodobenzene as arylating
reagent, the reaction could be carried out at 25 °C in the
presence of Cu2O in DMF to achieve the desired product in
90% yield.
A plausible mechanism for the formation of products
312 is given in Scheme 2. The copper complex 4, formed
from 1 and Cu2O, undergoes a reduction reaction with NaH
to generate the salt 5. This salt is attacked by aryl trifluoro-
methanesulfonate 2 to afford aryl hydrazide 3.
Spectroscopic analyses of all derivatives except 3d and 3m have
been reported.11
Diisopropyl 1-o-Tolylhydrazine-1,2-dicarboxylate (3d)
Yellow solid; mp 101–103 °C; yield: 0.21 g (72%). IR (KBr): νmax
= 3242, 1541, 1518, 1330, 1140 cm–1
CDCl3): δ = 1.16 (6 H, d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 Me), 1.25 (6 H, d, J = 7.0
.
1H NMR (500.1 MHz,
3
3
Hz, 2 Me), 2.33 (3 H, s, Me), 4.97–4.99 (2 H, m, 2 CHO), 7.06 (1
3
H, br s, NH), 7.19–7.22 (3 H, m, 3 CH), 7.44 (1 H, d, J = 7.8 Hz,
CH). 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.1 (2 Me), 21.4 (2 Me),
26.1 (Me), 68.9 (CHO), 70.1 (CHO), 113.1 (CH), 119.2 (CH), 126.3
(CH), 129.2 (CH), 130.9 (C), 140.5 (C), 155.7 (C=O), 156.1 (C=O).
MS: m/z (%) = 294 (4 [M+], 235 (57), 192 (42), 177 (40), 133
(100), 102 (76), 58 (34), 44 (28). Anal. Calcd (%) for C15H22N2O4
(294.35): C, 61.21; H, 7.53; N, 9.52. Found: C, 59.89; H, 7.59; N,
9.59.
ArOTf
NaH
H
CO2i-Pr
Cu2O
CO2i-Pr
2
N
N
1
3
N
N
i-PrO2C
i-PrO2C
Na
Cu2O
4
5
Diisopropyl 1-(2-Chlorophenyl)hydrazine-1,2-dicarboxylate
(3m)
Scheme 2
Colorless solid; mp 103–106 °C; yield 0.24 g (76%). IR (KBr):
ν
max = 3286, 1564, 1518, 1332, 1136 cm–1. 1H NMR (500.1 MHz,
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York — Synlett 2015, 26, 942–944