was washed with brine (3 ¥ 50 mL), 5% HCl (3 ¥ 50 mL), 10%
Na2CO3(3 ¥ 50 mL), brine (30 mL) and dried over Na2SO4. The
organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and the
crude product was purified by column chromatography using ethyl
acetate/pet ether to get 1.2 g (40%) of the pure dipeptide D4.
Crystal structure analysis of Boc-dgV-OEt. Crystals of Boc-
dgV-OEt were grown by slow evaporation from a solution of
EtOAc and Hexane. A single crystal (0.50¥ 0.35 ¥ 0.20 mm)
was mounted on loop with a small amount of the paraffin
oil. The X-ray data were collected at 200 K temperature on a
Bruker APEX DUO CCD diffractometer using Mo-Ka radiation
˚
(l = 0.71073 A), w-scans (2q = 55.84), for a total of 3650
independent reflections. Space group P21, 2(1), 2(1), a = 9.978(4),
3
˚
b = 10.083(3), c = 16.904(6), V = 1700.7(10) A , Orthorhombic
P, Z = 4 for chemical formula C14H25NO4, with one molecule in
asymmetric unit; r calcd = 1.060gcm-3, m = 0.077 mm-1, F(000) =
592, Rint = 0.0268. The structure was obtained by direct methods
using SHELXS-97.20 The final R value was 0.0581 (wR2 = 0.1589)
1978 observed reflections (F0 ≥ 4s (|F0|)) and 178 variables,
S = 1.011. The largest difference peak and hole were 0.344 and
Fig. 6 Circular Dichroism spectra of dipeptides D1, D2, D4 and D5 in
methanol.
using 5 : 95 ethyl acetate/pet ether solvent system. The pure
products were isolated with an average 85% yield. Individual yield,
1H, 13C and mass spectra of all Wittig products are given the
supporting information.
3
˚
-0.160eA , respectively.
Acknowledgements
Synthesis of Boc-dgL-dgL-OEt (D4)
We thank Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India
for financial support. S. M. M A. B., S. V. J. and M. G. K are
thankful to CSIR, for Research Fellowship.
(S,E)-4-(tert-butoxycarbonylamino)-6-methylhept-2-enoic acid-
(Boc-dgL-OH). Boc-dgL-OEt, 4C (1.86 g, 6.8 mmol) was dis-
solved in 4 mL of ethanol followed by 10 mL of 1 N NaOH
was added slowly to the solution. The reaction mixture was then
stirred for about 8h. The progress of reaction was monitored by
TLC. After completion of the reaction, the solvent was evaporated
under reduced pressure. The aqueous layer was diluted with water
(50 mL) and then acidified (~pH 3.0) with 5% HCl and extracted
with ethyl acetate (3 ¥ 50 mL). The combined organic layer was
then washed with brine and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. Product
was concentrated under reduced pressure to get 1.67 g (95%) of
oily Boc-dgL-OH.
References
1 (a) R. G. Linington, B. R. Clark, E. E. Trimble, A. Almanza, L.-D.
Uren, D. E. Kyle and W. H. Gerwick, J. Nat. Prod., 2009, 72, 14–
17; (b) J. E. Coleman, E. D. de Silva, F. Kong, R. J. Andersen and
T. M. Allen, Tetrahedron, 1995, 51, 10653–10662; (c) N. Schaschke,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2004, 14, 855–857; (d) M. Hagihara and
S. L. Schreiber, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 6570–6571; (e) J. A.
Nieman, J. E. Coleman, D. J. Wallace, E. Piers, L. Y. Lim, M. Roberge
and R. J. Andersen, J. Nat. Prod., 2003, 66, 183–199.
2 (a) T. Hintermann, K. Gademann, B. Jaun and D. Seebach, Helv. Chim.
Acta, 1998, 81, 983–1002; (b) M. Brenner and D. Seebach, Helv. Chim.
Acta, 2001, 84, 1181–1189.
(S,E)-Ethyl 4-amino-6-methylhept-2-enoate(H2N-dgL-OEt).
The solution of Boc-dgL-OEt (1.95 g, 7.2 mmol) in 5 mL of
DCM was cooled to 0 ◦C followed by 5 mL of neat TFA was
added. The reaction mixture was stirred for about 1.5 h at the
same temperature. The progress of the reaction was monitored
by TLC. After completion of the reaction (1.5 h), the solvent
was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was then
treated with saturated Na2CO3 solution in cold condition. This
aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 ¥ 50 mL). The
combined organic layer was washed with brine and dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4. The organic layer was concentrated under
reduced pressure to 4 mL.
The solution of H2N-dgL-OEt in ethyl acetate (4 mL) was added
to the ice-cold solution of Boc-dgL-OH (1.67 g, 6.5 mmol) in DMF
(4 ml). The reaction mixture was then treated with DCC (1.34 g,
6.5 mmol) followed by HOBt (0.884 g, 6.5 mmol). The reaction
mixture was stirred for about 12 h at room temperature and the
progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion
of reaction, the reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate
(100 mL) and DCU formed in reaction was filtered. This filtrate
3 (a) M. M. M. Santos and R. Moreira, Mini-Rev. Med. Chem., 2007, 7,
1040–1050; (b) J. S. Plummer, L. A. Emery, M. A. Stier and M. J. Suto,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 7529–7532.
4 Y. Fu, B. Xu, X. Zou, C. Ma, X. Yang, K. Mou, G. Fu, Y. Lu and P.
Xu, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2007, 17, 1102–1106.
5 M. T. Reetz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 1531–1546.
6 (a) R. P. Hanzlik and S. A. Thompson, J. Med. Chem., 1984, 27, 711–
712; (b) H. M. M. Bastiaans, J. L. van der Baan and H. C. J. Ottenheijm,
J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 3880–3889; (c) S. Liu and R. P. Hanzlik,
J. Med. Chem., 1992, 35, 1067–1075; (d) J-S. Kong, S. Venkatraman,
K. Furness, S. Nimkar, T. A. Shepherd, Q. M. Wang, J. Aube’ and
R. P. Hanzlik, J. Med. Chem., 1998, 41, 2579–2587; (e) A. Breuning, B.
Degel, F. Schulz, C. Buchold, M. Stempka, U. Machon, S. Heppner, C.
Gelhaus, M. Leippe, M. Leyh, C. Kisker, J. Rath, A. Stich, J. Gut, P. J.
Rosenthal, C. Schmuck and T. Schirmeister, J. Med. Chem., 2010, 53,
1951–1963; (f) N. Schaschke and C. P. Sommerhoff, ChemMedChem,
2010, 5, 367–370.
7 (a) D. J. Hill, M. J. Mio, R. B. Prince, T. S. Hughes and Jeffrey S. Moore,
Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 3893–4011; (b) S. H Gellman, Acc. Chem. Res.,
1998, 31, 173–180; (c) I. C. Kim and A. D. Hamilton, Org. Lett., 2006,
8, 1751–1754; (d) N. J. Brown, C. W. Wu, S. L. Seurynck-Servoss and
A. E. Barron, Biochemistry, 2008, 47, 1808–1818.
8 (a) D. Seebach and J. Gardiner, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1366–1375;
(b) W. S. Horne and S. H. Gellmann, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1399–
1408; (c) P. G. Vasudev, S. Chatterjee, N. Shamala and P. Balaram, Acc.
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 6566–6574 | 6573
©