alkyl-functionalized CPDT as the conjugated bridge showed
an extremely high molar absorption coefficient and a high
power conversion efficiency of 8.95% in liquid cell and 6% in
a solid-state DSC.8 BDT, the dithiophene analog of phenan-
threne, has several isomers, of which benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b0]-
dithiophene and benzo[2,1-b:3,4-b0]dithiophene have already
been widely utilized in the construction of conjugated
copolymers9 and D-π-A dyes10 for photovoltaic applica-
tions. Another isomer of BDT, benzo[1,2-b:4,3-b0]-
dithiophene, however, to the best of our knowledge, has
hardly been investigated in the DSC field.
cyanoacrylic acid as the electron acceptor. The synthesized
organic dyes (C220, G54, G55, G104, G107, and G108) are
shown in Figure 1, with the synthetic methodology of the
five target molecules being highlighted in Scheme S1. The
C220 sensitizer is synthesized according to the reported
procedure for comparison.8b
Figure 2. UVꢀvis absorption spectra of all the dyes in CH2Cl2
solution.
The UVꢀvis absorption spectra of the dyes in CH2Cl2
solutions are depicted in Figure 2. Their absorption,
electrochemical properties, and frontier orbital energy
levels are summarized in Table 1. The electronic absorp-
tion spectra reveal two major characteristics depending
on the substituted π-bridges. Specifically, the four dyes
(G54, G104, and C220) containing CPDT as a bridge
exhibit a single prominent band with the absorption max-
imum around ca. 530ꢀ570 nm, while the others (G55, G107,
and G108) with BDT as the bridge have two absorption
bands at ca. 370ꢀ410 nm and at ca. 450ꢀ510 nm. Such
absorption characteristics indicate that the electron density
on CPDT is richer than that of BDT and the absorption
bands can be ascribed to the πꢀπ* transition and intra-
molecular charge transfer (ICT) transitions of the D-π-A
conjugated backbone. Apparently, in either case of the
bridges (CPDT or BDT), the absorption maxima of ICT
transitions are generally red-shifting in the sequence thiazol
< phenyl < thienyl. The phenomenon is in line with the
electronic richness of the relative (hetero)cycles, and due to
the fortified quinoidal character of thiophene, the adoption
of the thiophene linker endows the corresponding dye with
the smallest band gap.11 This result clearly indicates that
modulation of the electron density of D-π-A dyes can be
achieved by altering the electronic nature of the π-bridges.
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) is employed to estimate the
first oxidation potential (Eox), which corresponds to the
HOMO levels of the dyes (Table 1, SI Figure S1). Nor-
mally, two oxidation waves are observed on the voltam-
mograms. The first oxidation waves at lower oxidation
potentials are generally from the contribution of triaryla-
mine, whereas the second ones, with higher oxidation
Figure 1. Structure of the synthesized dyes.
Judiciously varying the conjugating π-spacer between
the donor and acceptor fragments has been the most
popular approach to structural modification for modulat-
ing the frontier orbital energy levels and for generating
dyes with broad and intense absorption. Therefore, this
work elaborates on the use of various (hetero)cyclic linkers
(benzene, thiophene, and thiazole) combined with differ-
ent conjugated π-bridges (CPDT and BDT) to evaluate the
impact on the overall efficiency while maintaining
(8) (a) Cai, N.; Moon, S.-J.; Cevey-Ha, L.; Moehl, T.; Humphry-
€
Baker, R.; Wang, P.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Gratzel, M. Nano Lett. 2011,
11, 1452. (b) Li, R.; Liu, J.; Cai, N.; Zhang, M.; Wang, P. J. Phys. Chem.
B 2010, 114, 4461.
(9) (a) Chen, H. Y.; Hou, J. H.; Zhang, S. Q.; Liang, Y. Y.; Yang,
G. W.; Yang, Y.; Yu, L. P.; Wu, Y.; Li, G. Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 649.
(b) Hou, J. H.; Chen, H. Y.; Zhang, S. Q.; Chen, R. I.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Y.;
Li, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15586. (c) Huo, L. J.; Guo, X.;
Zhang, S. Q.; Li, Y. F.; Hou, J. H. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 4035. (d)
Huo, L. J.; Hou, J. H.; Zhang, S. Q.; Chen, H. Y.; Yang, Y. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1500. (e) Liang, Y. Y.; Xu, Z.; Xia, J.; Tsai,
S. T.; Wu, Y.; Li, G.; Ray, C.; Yu, L. P. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, E135. (f)
Price, S.; Stuart, A.; Yang, L.; Zhou, H.; You, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 4625. (g) Wang, M.; Hu, X.; Liu, P.; Li, W.; Gong, X.; Huang,
F.; Cao, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 9638. (h) Zheng, Q.; Jung, B. J.;
Sun, J.; Katz, H. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5394. (i) Zhou, H.;
Yang, L.; Stuart, A.; Price, S.; Liu, S.; You, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011, 50, 2995.
(10) Hao, X.; Liang, M.; Cheng, X.; Pian, X.; Sun, Z.; Xue, S. Org.
Lett. 2011, 13, 5424.
(11) (a) Roncali, J. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 173. (b) Roncali, J. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1719.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 17, 2012
4331