Scheme 3 Synthesis of the rhodium(I) complexes 7a–c [Ar=Phenyl
(a); 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl (b); 2,6-diisopropylphenyl = Dipp (c)].
of salts 4a–c, at ꢀ78 1C, with LiHMDS, in the presence of half
an equivalent of [Rh(COD)Cl]2, followed by treatment with an
excess of carbon monoxide (Scheme 3).
The average CO vibration frequency for 7a–c (nan = 2034
cmꢀ1) indicates that the electron-donor capabilities of thiazol-
5-ylidenes are slightly superior to those of conventional NHCs
(nan = 2039–2041cmꢀ1),16 similar to those of 1,3-dithiol-5-
Scheme 1 Synthesis of thiazolium salts 3a–c and 4a–c [Ar = Phenyl
(a); 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl (b); 2,6-diisopropylphenyl (c)].
ylidene F (nan = 2030 cmꢀ1 9
) and cyclic (alkyl)(amino)-
carbenes (nan = 2036 cmꢀ1),17 but inferior to those of MICs
C–E (van = 2016–2025 cmꢀ1).2d
Although thiazol-5-ylidenes cannot be observed, the readily
available 2,3,4-triaryl-substituted thiazolium salts are modular
precursors for the synthesis of a variety of thiazol-5-ylidenes
transition metal complexes. This novel type of MIC ligand
features stronger donor properties than classical NHCs, and
gives rise to complexes, which are thermally- and air-stable.
Research in our laboratory is currently underway to extend
the scope of mesoionic carbenes, and explore the catalytic
activity of the corresponding complexes.
Fig. 2 Crystal structures of thiazolium salt 3b (left) and gold complex
5b (right) with ellipsoids shown at 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms,
except for the CH of 3b, are omitted for clarity. Selected bond
distances [A] and angles [1]: 3b: C(1)–S(1) = 1.716(6), C(1)–C(3) =
1.363(6), C(3)–N(1) = 1.397(3), N(1)–C(2) = 1.361(3), C(2)–S(1) =
1.684(2), C(3)–C(1)–S(1) = 112.0(4); 5b: C(1)–S(1) = 1.697(14),
This work was supported by the NIH (R01 GM 68825) and
DOE (DE-FG02-09ER16069).
Notes and references
C(1)–C(3)
1.351(15), C(2)–S(1)
Au(1)–Cl(1) = 2.293(4), C(3)–C(1)–S(1) = 110.0(10).
=
1.364(16), C(3)–N(1)
=
1.414(15), N(1)–C(2)
=
z Crystal data: 3b: C27H30BrNO2S, M = 512.49, monoclinic, a =
9.4960(14), b = 28.054(4), c = 9.6399(14), a = 90, b = 104.693(2),
g = 90, V = 2484.1(6) A3, T = 100(2) K, space group P21/c, Z = 4,
20 859 reflections measured, 6277 unique (Rint = 0.0276), which were
used in all calculations. The final R [I 4 2sigma(I)] was 0.0319. 5b:
C24H21AuClNS, M = 587.89, monoclinic, a = 18.170(4), b =
9.7695(15), c = 24.734(4), a = 90, b = 99.134(3), g = 90, V =
4334.9(12) A3, T = 200(2) K, space group C2/c, Z = 8, 11 994
reflections measured, 4607 unique (Rint = 0.0501), which were used
in all calculations. The final R [I 4 2sigma(I)] was 0.0648.
=
1.695(14), Au(1)–C(1)
=
2.005(14),
1 S. Grundemann, A. Kovacevic, M. Albrecht, J. W. Faller and
¨
R. H. Crabtree, Chem. Commun., 2001, 2274.
2 For reviews on imidazol-5-ylidenes and related species, see:
(a) O. Schuster, L. Yang, H. G. Raubenheimer and M. Albrecht,
Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 3445; (b) M. Albrecht, Chem. Commun.,
2008, 3601; (c) P. L. Arnold and S. Pearson, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2007, 251, 596; (d) M. Albrecht, Chimia, 2009, 63, 105;
(e) M. Melaimi, M. Soleilhavoup and G. Bertrand, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 8810.
Scheme 2 Synthesis of metal complexes 5a–c and 6a–c [Ar = Phenyl
(a); 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl (b); 2,6-diisopropylphenyl (c)].
solution, were subjected to an X-ray diffraction analysis
(Fig. 2, right). Complex 5b crystallizes in the C2/c space group
displaying a monomeric unit with a Au(1)–C(1) bond distance
of 2.005(14)A, which is slightly longer that those observed for
the (1,3-dithiol-5-ylidene)AuCl [1.978(4)A]9 and (imidazol-5-
ylidene)AuCl [1.98 A].5 The carbene bond angle angle in 5b
[110.0(10)1] is slightly more acute than the corresponding angle
of thiazolium salt 3b [112.0(4)1]. This feature is consistent with
the increased s-character of the s lone-pair orbital on the
carbene atom in 5b as compared with the C–H+ bond orbital
in 3b. Finally, as expected, the Au(I) center is in a linear
environment with an C(1)–Au(1)–Cl(1) angle of 179.2(4)1.
To evaluate the donor properties of thiazol-5-ylidene
ligands, the corresponding rhodium(I) dicarbonyl chloride
complexes 7a–c were prepared by the in situ deprotonation
3 For recent reviews on NHCs, see for examples: (a) T. Droge and
¨
F. Glorius, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 6940;
(b) G. C. Vougioukalakis and R. H. Grubbs, Chem. Rev., 2010,
110, 1746; (c) J. C. Y. Lin, R. T. W. Huang, C. S. Lee,
A. Bhattacharyya, W. S. Hwang and I. J. B. Lin, Chem. Rev.,
2009, 109, 3561; (d) P. L. Arnold and I. J. Casely, Chem. Rev.,
2009, 109, 3599; (e) S. Dıez-Gonzalez, N. Marion and S. P. Nolan,
´ ´
Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 3612; (f) M. Poyatos, J. A. Mata and
E. Peris, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 3677; (g) C. Samoj"owicz,
M. Bieniek and K. Grela, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 3708;
(h) W. A. L. van Otterlo and C. B. de Koning, Chem. Rev.,
2009, 109, 3743; (i) S. Monfette and D. E. Fogg, Chem. Rev.,
2009, 109, 3783; (j) B. Alcaide, P. Almendros and A. Luna, Chem.
Rev., 2009, 109, 3817; (k) F. E. Hahn and M. C. Jahnke, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 3122; (l) D. Bourissou, O. Guerret,
F. P. Gabbaı and G. Bertrand, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 39.
¨
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 10614–10616 10615