Journal of the American Chemical Society
ARTICLE
thienyl rings, there is strong charge delocalization into the
dithienylperfluorocyclopentene core, and one might consider
the resulting radical monocations as partially “bridge-localized”
species. Nevertheless, our study shows that thanks to the
symmetrical nature of molecule 3 with its two easily oxidizable
termini, the monocationic closed form of this compound exhibits
spectroscopic and electrochemical properties that are typical for
mixed valence species. For 3c•+, the experimental data is con-
sistent with delocalization of the odd electron over the entire
molecule (Robin-Day class III), while in the case of 1c•+, there is
only partial charge delocalization (Robin-Day class II). In the
open forms of both cations, the odd electron is localized on one
branch of the otherwise symmetrical systems (Robin-Day class I).
Because the open and closed forms can be interconverted by
irradiation with UV and visible light, the extent of electronic
communication is photoswitchable. Notably, intervalence ab-
sorptions in the molecules studied herein can be detected at long
wavelengths (>900 nm) at which no photoisomerization reac-
tions are induced, thereby allowing nondestructive interrogation
of the cyclization state. This has been an important goal of much
research on dithienylcyclopentenes.30
Attachment of the redox-active tertiary amine units directly to
the thienyl-rings permits construction of molecular mixed va-
lence systems with significantly shorter (geometrical and
effective) electron transfer distances than what has previously
been achieved for dithienylcyclopentene-based mixed valence
molecules with inorganic redox centers.11 What is more, it also
introduces the interesting possibility of electrochemically indu-
cing the cyclization reaction by a two-electron process.
In molecular wires, tertiary amine-substituted dithienylcyclo-
pentenes may represent interesting photoswitchable building
blocks. In their closed forms, they may serve as good hopping
stations for long-range charge transfer between distant donors
and acceptors because within these units, charge is strongly
delocalized. In their open forms, by contrast, charge is localized
and hopping events involving these molecular units as stations
(also called stepping stones)3b have to occur over greater
molecular distances.
Varian or on a Cary 50 instrument from the same company. Copper(II)
perchlorate was used as the preferred oxidant as described earlier.19
Identical results were obtained with NOBF4, but this compound is more
difficult to handle and titration errors were generally larger.
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S
Supporting Information. Synthetic protocols and char-
b
acterization data for compounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 14, 16, 17 and for two
reference compounds; optical absorption and cyclic voltammetry
data for the two reference compounds mentioned in the text.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
’ REFERENCES
(1) (a) Hush, N. S. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1967, 8, 391. (b) Creutz, C.
Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 30, 1. (c) Creutz, C.; Taube, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1969, 91, 3988. (d) Brunschwig, B. S.; Sutin, N. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999,
187, 233. (e) Nelsen, S. F. Chem.—Eur. J. 2000, 6, 581. (f) Demadis,
K. D.; Hartshorn, C. M.; Meyer, T. J. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2655.
(g) Launay, J.-P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30, 386. (h) Brunschwig, B.
S.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 168. (i) D’Alessandro,
D. M.; Keene, F. R. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2270. (j) D’Alessandro, D. M.;
Keene, F. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 424.
(2) (a) Cowan, D. O.; Levanda, C.; Park, J.; Kaufman, F. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1973, 6, 1. (b) Mazur, S.; Sreekumar, C.; Schroeder, A. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 6713. (c) Hankache, J.; Wenger, O. S. Chem. Rev.
2011, 111, 5138–5178.
(3) (a) Gray, H. B.; Winkler, J. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005,
102, 3534. (b) Cordes, M.; Giese, B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 892.
(c) Lloveras, V.; Vidal-Gancedo, J.; Figueira-Duarte, T. M.; Nierengarten,
J. F.; Novoa, J. J.; Mota, F.;Ventosa, N.; Rovira, C.; Veciana, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 5818.
(4) Funston, A.; Kirby, J. P.; Miller, J. R.; Pospíꢀsil, L.; Fiedler, J.;
Hromadovꢁa, M.; Gꢁal, M.; Pecka, J.; Valꢁaꢀsek, M.; Zawada, Z.; Rempala,
P.; Michl, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 10862.
(5) (a) Roncali, J. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 711. (b) Tour, J. M. Chem.
Rev. 1996, 96, 537. (c) Roncali, J. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 1875. (d) Lu,
J. P.; Xia, P. F.; Lo, P. K.; Tao, Y.; Wong, M. S. Chem. Mater. 2006,
18, 6194. (e) Chen, J. W.; Cao, Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1709.
(f) Gao, P.; Beckmann, D.; Tsao, H. N.; Feng, X. L.; Enkelmann, V.;
Baumgarten, M.; Pisula, W.; M€ullen, K. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 213.
(6) (a) Odom, S. A.; Lancaster, K.; Beverina, L.; Lefler, K. M.;
Thompson, N. J.; Coropceanu, V.; Brꢁedas, J. L.; Marder, S. R.; Barlow, S.
Chem.—Eur. J. 2007, 13, 9637. (b) N€oll, G.; Avola, M.; Lynch, M.; Daub,
J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 3197. (c) Lacroix, J. C.; Chane-Ching, K. I.;
Maquꢂere, F.; Maurel, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7264.
(7) (a) Raymo, F. M.; Tomasulo, M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 327.
(b) Milder, M. T. W.; Areephong, J.; Feringa, B. L.; Browne, W. R.;
Herek, J. L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 479, 137.
(8) Feringa, B. L. Molecular Switches; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001.
(9) (a) Irie, M. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1685. (b) Tian, H.; Yang, S. J.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 85.
(10) (a) Gilat, S. L.; Kawai, S. H.; Lehn, J. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1993, 1439. (b) Tsivgoulis, G. M.; Lehn, J. M. Chem.—Eur. J.
1996, 2, 1399. (c) Endtner, J. M.; Effenberger, F.; Hartschuh, A.; Port, H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3037. (d) Peters, A.; McDonald, R.; Branda,
N. R. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2274. (e) Liddell, P. A.; Kodis, G.; Moore,
A. L.; Moore, T. A.; Gust, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7668.
(f) Wenger, O. S.; Henling, L. M.; Day, M. W.; Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B.
Polyhedron 2004, 23, 2955. (g) Jukes, R. T. F.; Adamo, V.; Hartl, F.;
’ EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Commercially available chemicals were used as received without
further purification. All reactions were carried out under nitrogen using
solvents which were dried by routine methods. Thin-layer chromatog-
raphy was performed using Polygram SIL G/UV254 plates from
Machery-Nagel. For column chromatography, Silica Gel 60 from
Macherey-Nagel was employed. Reaction products were characterized
1
by H and 13C NMR spectroscopy (Avance DRX 300 spectrometer,
using the deuterated solvent as the lock and residual solvent as an
internal reference), by electron ionization mass spectrometry (EI-MS)
using a Finnigan MAT8200 instrument, and by elemental analysis.
Detailed synthetic protocols and product characterization data are given
in the Supporting Information. Cyclic voltammetry was performed using
a Versastat3ꢀ100 potentiostat from Princeton Applied Research
equipped with a Pt disk working electrode, and a silver counter
electrode. A silver wire did also serve as a quasi-reference electrode.
Decamethylferrocene (Me10Fc) was used as an internal reference,18 but
all experimentally determined potentials are reported relative to the
ferrocenium/ferrocene (Fc+/0) couple as is commonly done in electro-
chemistry. Prior to voltage scans at rates of 100 mV/s, nitrogen gas was
bubbled through the dried solvent. The supporting electrolyte was a
0.1 M solution of tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate. Optical
absorption spectra were recorded on a Cary 5000 spectrometer from
17035
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja207025x |J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 17027–17036