5126
M.M. Ghorab et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 46 (2011) 5120e5126
4.1.10.2. 4-(8-Amino-9(4-chlorophenyl)-6-thioxo-5,9-dihy-
The relation between surviving fraction and drug concentration
was plotted to get the survival curve for breast tumor cell line after
the specified time. The molar concentration required for 50%
inhibition of cell viability (IC50) was calculated and compared to the
reference drug doxorubicin (CAS, 25316-40-9). The surviving frac-
tions were expressed as means ꢁ standard error and the results are
given in Table 1.
drothiazolo[4,5-b]pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine-2-yl amino) benzene-
sulfonamide (16). Yield, 76%; m.p. 300e302 ꢂC; IR, (KBr, cmꢀ1):
3315, 3270, 3174 (NH, NH2), 3080 (CH arom.), 2950, 2870 (CH
aliph.), 1596 (C]N), 1250 (C]S), 1330, 1152 (SO2). MS m/z (%): 519
[Mþ] (10.00), 77 (100). Anal. Calcd. For C20H15ClN6O3S3 (519.02): C,
46.28; H, 2.91; N, 16.19. Found: C, 46.38; H, 3.18; N, 15.96.
4.1.11. 4-(7-(4-Chlorophenyl)-6-cyano-5-ureido-7H- thiazolo[4,5-
b]pyrane -2-yl amino)benzenesulfonamide (17)
4.3. Radio-sensitizing evaluation
A mixture of compound 5 (0.91 g, 0.002 mol) and urea (0.12 g,
0.002 mol) and sodium ethoxide (0.03 g, 0.002 mol) in ethanol
(20 mL) was refluxed for 5 h. The reaction mixture was then poured
onto cold water, the obtained solid was crystallized from dioxane to
give compound 17: Yield, 80%; m.p. 240e242 ꢂC; IR, (KBr, cmꢀ1):
3338, 3294, 3250 (NH, NH2), 3095 (CH arom.), 2970, 2860 (CH
aliph.), 2201 (C^N), 1728 (C]O), 1560 (C]N), 1331, 1156 (SO2).
The most potent compounds resulted from the in vitro anti-
cancer screening, the thiazolo[4,5-b]pyrane derivatives 5 and 12
and the thiazolo[4,5-b]pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives 6 and
10, were selected to be reevaluated again for their in vitro anti-
cancer activity in combination with
conducted to evaluate the ability of these compounds to enhance
the cell killing effect of -radiation.
Cells were subjected to a single dose of
g-radiation. This study was
g
1H-NMR (DMSO-d6)
d: 3.8 [s, 1H, NH, exchangeable with D2O], 4.5
g-radiation at a dose
[s, 1H, CH pyrane], 6.5 [s, 1H, NHCO, exchangeable with D2O],
7.3e8.0 [m, 10H, Ar-H þ SO2NH2], 8.3 [s, 2H, CONH2, exchangeable
with D2O]. MS m/z (%): 502 [Mþ] (7.63), 55 (100). Anal. Calcd. For
C20H15ClN6O4S2 (502.95): C, 47.76; H, 3.01; N,16.71. Found: C, 47.88;
H, 3.13; N, 16.85.
level of 8 Gy with a dose rate of 2 Gy/min. Irradiation was per-
formed in the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, using
Gamma cell-40 (60Co) source.
The surviving fractions were expressed as means ꢁ standard
error. The results were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA test and given
in Table 2.
4.1.12. 2-Chloro-N-(7-(4-chlorophenyl)-6-cyano-2-(4-sulfamoyl-
phenylamino)-7H- thiazolo[4,5-b]pyrane -5-yl)acetamide (18)
A mixture of compound 5 (0.91 g, 0.002 mol) and chloroacetyl-
chloride (0.22 g, 0.002 mol) was stirred in dimethylformamide for
6 h at room temperature, then the reaction mixture was poured
onto cold water. The obtained solid was crystallized from ethanol to
give compound 18: Yield, 68%; m.p. 164e166 ꢂC; IR, (KBr, cmꢀ1):
3339, 3244, 3194 (NH, NH2), 3089 (CH arom.), 2970, 2860 (CH
aliph.), 2204 (C^N), 1690 (C]O), 1615 (C]N), 1331, 1155 (SO2), 750
References
[1] J. Drews, Science 287 (2000) 1960e1964.
[2] A.E. Boyd 3rd, Diabetes 37 (1988) 847e850.
[3] C.T. Supuran, A. Scozzafava, Expert Opin. Ther. Pat 10 (2000) 575e600.
[4] T.H. Maren, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 16 (1976) 309e327.
[5] C.T. Supuran, A. Scozzafava, Curr. Med. Chem. Immunol. Endocr. Metabol
Agents 1 (2001) 61e97.
[6] C.W. Thornber, Chem. Soc. Rev. 8 (1979) 563e580.
[7] F. Abbate, A. Casini, T. Owa, A. Scozzafava, C.T. Supuran, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 14 (2004) 217e223.
[8] M.M. Ghorab, E. Noaman, M.M. Ismail, H.I. Heiba, Y.A. Ammar, M.Y. Sayed,
Arzneimittelforschung 56 (2006) 405e413.
[9] M.M. Ismail, M.M. Ghorab, E. Noaman, Y.A. Ammar, H.I. Heiba, M.Y. Sayed,
Arzneimittelforschung 56 (2006) 301e308.
[10] S.A. Rostom, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14 (2006) 6475e6485.
[11] C.T. Supuran, A. Casini, A. Mastrolorenzo, A. Scozzafava, Mini-Rev Med. Chem.
4 (2004) 625e632.
[12] A.J. Kivela, J. Kivela, J. Saarnio, S. Parkkila, World J. Gastroenterol. 11 (2005)
155e163.
(C-Cl). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6)
d: 3.8 [s, 1H, NH, exchangeable with
D2O], 4.2 [s, 2H, CH2Cl], 4.7 [s, 1H, CH pyrane], 7.3e8.0 [m, 10H,
Ar-H þ SO2NH2], 8.2 [s, 1H, NHCO, exchangeable with D2O]. MS m/z
(%): 537 [Mþ] (0.53), 90 (100). Anal. Calcd. For C21H15Cl2N5o4S2
(536.41): C, 47.02; H, 2.82; N,13.06. Found: C, 47.26; H, 3.04; N,13.18.
4.2. In vitro anticancer screening
Human tumor breast cell line (MCF7) was used in this study. The
cytotoxic activity was measured in vitro for the newly synthesized
compounds using the Sulfo-Rhodamine B stain (SRB) assay using
the method of Skehan et al. [26]. The in vitro anticancer screening
was done by the pharmacology unit at the National Cancer Insti-
tute, Cairo University.
[13] C.T. Supuran, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7 (2008) 168e181.
[14] C.T. Supuran, A. Scozzafava, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 15 (2007) 4336e4350.
[15] C.T. Supuran, A. Scozzafava, A. Casini, Med. Res. Rev. 23 (2003) 146e189.
[16] A. Casini, A. Scozzafava, A. Mastrolorenzo, C.T. Supuran, Curr. Cancer Drug
Targets 2 (2002) 55e75.
[17] A. Aliabadi, F. Shamsa, S.N. Ostad, S. Emami, A. Shafiee, J. Davoodi,
A. Foroumadi, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2010) 5384e5389.
[18] E.L. Luzina, A.V. Popov, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44 (2009) 4944e4953.
[19] V. Zaharia, A. Ignat, N. Palibroda, B. Ngameni, V. Kuete, C.N. Fokunang,
M.L. Moungang, B.T. Ngadjui, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2010) 5080e5085.
[20] H. Boshi, S.J. Zhang, Q.F. Ge, D.W. Guo, C.M. Cai, W.X. Hu, Biorg. Med.Chem.
Lett. 20 (2010) 6555e6559.
Cells were plated in 96-multiwell plate (104cells/well) for 24 h
before treatment with the compound(s) to allow attachment of cell
to the wall of the plate. Test compounds were dissolved in dime-
thylsulfoxide. Different concentrations of the compound under test
[21] D. Havrylyuk, L. Mosula, B. Zimenkovsky, O. Vasylenko, A. Gzella, R. Lesyk, Eur.
J. Med. Chem. 45 (2010) 5012e5021.
(10, 25, 50, and 100 mM) were added to the cell monolayer. Tripli-
[22] Z.Y. Liu, Y.M. Wang, Z.R. Li, J.D. Jiang, W. Boykin, Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19
(2009) 5661e5664.
[23] R. Lesyk, B. Zimenkousky, D. Atamanyuk, F. Jensen, K.K. Konononicz, A. Gzella,
Biorg. Med. Chem 14 (2006) 5230e5240.
[24] Y. Nishimura, Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 9 (2004) 414e420.
[25] M. Siavosh, S. Andreas, H. Heymo, E. Emerich, B. Thomas, S. Mathias,
M. Thomas, S.F. Josef, B.L. Thomas, J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006) 5769e5776.
[26] P. Skehan, R. Storeng, D. Scudiero, A. Monks, J. McMahon, D. Vistica, Cancer
Inst. 82 (1990) 1107e1112.
cate wells were prepared for each individual concentration.
Monolayer cells were incubated with the compound(s) for 48 h at
37 ꢂC and in atmosphere of 5% CO2. After 48 h, cells were fixed,
washed and stained for 30 min with 0.4% (wt/vol) SRB dissolved in
1% acetic acid. Excess unbound dye was removed by four washes
with 1% acetic acid and attached stain was recovered with
TriseEDTA buffer. Color intensity was measured in an ELISA reader.