ORGANIC
LETTERS
2001
Vol. 3, No. 11
1629-1632
Electrophilic Aromatic Substitutions of
Silylated Furans and Thiophenes with
Retention of the Organosilyl Group
Mirjam Herrlich, Nathalie Hampel, and Herbert Mayr*
Department Chemie der Ludwig-Maximilians-UniVersita¨t Mu¨nchen,
Butenandtstrasse 5-13 (Haus F), D-81377 Mu¨nchen, Germany
Received March 8, 2001
ABSTRACT
The influence of trialkylsilyl groups on the nucleophilic reactivities of furans and thiophenes is determined by kinetic experiments.
Arylsilanes usually react with electrophiles to give arenes
in which the electrophile occupies the position to which the
silyl group was previously bonded.1 This orientation has been
explained by the well-known â-stabilizing effect of silicon.2
In contrast to this general statement, examples have been
reported in which electrophilic aromatic substitution of
arylsilanes proceeds with retention of the silyl group.3
easily be introduced and replaced by electrophiles via ipso-
substitution.5a However, in 1948 Benkeser reported that
electrophilic acetylations of 2-(trimethylsilyl)furan and 2-(tri-
methylsilyl)thiophene do not proceed with ipso-substitution
but take place at the 5-position (Scheme 1).5b
Ishibashi and co-workers, for example, found that the
reaction of trimethylphenylsilane with methyl chloro(meth-
ylthio)acetate in the presence of tin(IV) chloride did not give
ipso-substitution but a mixture of disubstituted benzenes.4
In a recent review, Keay has described the use of organosilyl
moieties as blocking groups in furan chemistry, which can
Scheme 1. Acetylation of 2-(Trimethylsilyl)furan and
-thiophene.
It was the goal of this work to investigate the influence
of organosilyl groups on the reactivity of heteroarenes by
kinetic and product studies.
Treatment of the 2-silylfurans 1a-d (1.3-1.5 equiv) with
the triflate of the dianisylcarbenium ion 2a gave the furans
4 and 5 in a 2:8 to 3:7 ratio. A higher 4/5 ratio was generally
observed with the triflate of the ferrocenylphenylcarbenium
ion 2b as the electrophile (Table 1, upper half).
(1) Weber, W. P. In Silicon reagents for the Organic Synthesis; Springer-
Verlag: Berlin, 1983; Vol. 14; Chapter 8, pp 114-128.
(2) For reviews, see: Apeloig, Y. In Heteroatom Chemistry: ICHAC-
2; Block, E., Ed.; VCH: New York, 1990; pp 27-46. Apeloig, Y. In The
Chemistry of Silicon Compounds; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.; J. Wiley
& Sons: Chichester, 1998; Vol. 1, Chapter 2, pp 57-225. Lambert, J. B.;
Zhao, Y.; Emblidge, R. W.; Salvador, L. A.; Liu, X.; So, J.-H.; Chelius, E.
C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 183-190. Siehl, H.-U.; Mu¨ller, T. In The
Chemistry of Silicon Compounds; Rappoport, Z., Apeloig, Y., Eds.; J. Wiley
& Sons: Chichester, 1998; Vol. 2, Chapter 12, pp 595-701.
(3) For reviews, see: Bassindale, A. R.; Glynn, S. J.; Taylor, P. G. In
The Chemistry of Silicon Compounds; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.; J. Wiley
& Sons: Chichester, 1998; Vol. 2, Chapter 7, pp 382-388. Colvin, E. W.
Silicon in Organic Synthesis; Butterworth: London, 1981. Fleming, I. In
ComprehensiVe Organic Chemistry; Jones, N. D.; Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford
1979; Chapter 13, Vol. 3.
Though the formation of 4 and 5 was initially rationalized
by direct displacement of the silyl group in 1a-d, another
reaction mechanism is suggested by experiments conducted
(4) Ishibashi, H.; Sakashita, H.; Ikeda, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1992, 1953-1957.
(5) (a) Keay, B. A. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1999, 28, 209-215. (b) Benkeser,
R. A.; Currie, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 1780-1782.
10.1021/ol015810+ CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 05/04/2001