Journal of the American Chemical Society
COMMUNICATION
with respect to 1red) and bubbling of O2 through the solution for
5 min, the gel was restored (Figure 3c). Finally, the reformed gel
was treated with hydroquinone (1 equiv per eDAN 1), leading to
1
a solution (Figure 3d). Each step was followed by H NMR
spectroscopy, and control experiments were performed to confirm
that the redox reagents were responsible for the 1red to 1ox inter-
conversion and that this in turn controlled the formation of the
supramolecular polymer blend.14 Multiple cycles were not exam-
1
ined, but in H NMR experiments with 1 alone, several redox
cycles were possible, although obvious byproducts were formed.14
In conclusion, the redox-responsive eDAN module 1 was
designed and shown to pair with high affinity to DeUG in its
reduced form (ꢀΔG° = 8.3 kcal molꢀ1 for 1red 2) but to bind
3
weakly when oxidized (ꢀΔG° = 3.8 kcal molꢀ1 for 1ox 2). The
3
very large decrease in binding points to the utility of coupling
the stimulus and the hydrogen-bonding motif displayed by the
recognition unit. A simple application to stimuli-responsive
supramolecular polymer networks that did not require incor-
poration of the responsive unit into the polymers was demon-
strated. Future improvements will involve altering the naphthy-
ridine unit in a way that allows reversible electrochemical
switching.
Figure 2. ITC data for (a) 1red 2 and (b) 1ox 2. A detailed discussion
3
3
of the ITC data can be found in the SI.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Reactive Monomers and Copolym-
erization To Give (a) PS-DAN (5) and (b) PBMA-DeUG (6)a
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S
Supporting Information. Synthetic procedures and
b
1
characterization data, H NMR and UVꢀvis titration studies,
and ITC data. This material is available free of charge via the
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
Present Addresses
†Department of Chemical Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang
790-784, Korea.
a Abbreviations: AIBN, azobis(isobutyronitrile); DMAP, 2,6-dimethyla-
minopyridine; EDCI, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide.
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Funding for this work provided by the National Science
Foundation (CHE-1012212) is gratefully acknowledged.
’ REFERENCES
(1) (a) Zimmerman, S. C.; Corbin, P. S. Struct. Bonding 2000, 96, 63.
(b) Wilson, A. J. Soft Matter 2007, 3, 409. (c) Sijbesma, R. P.; Meijer,
E. W. Chem. Commun. 2003, 5. (d) Kato, T.; Mizoshita, N.; Kanie, K.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2001, 22, 797. (e) Molecular Recognition and
Polymers: Control of Polymer Structure and Self-Assembly; Rotello, V. M.,
Thayumanavan, S., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2008; pp 65ꢀ102,
207ꢀ234, 235ꢀ258;
Figure 3. 14(a) Blend of PS-DAN and PBMA-DeUG. (b) Blend with
1
red added. (c) Reformation of viscous gel by oxidation of 1red to 1ox.
(d) Redestruction of the polymer blend by reduction of 1ox to 1red
.
(2) (a) Jeffrey, G. A. In An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding; Oxford
University Press: New York, 1997. (b) Yang, S. Y.; Rubner, M. F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2100. (c) Thibault, R. J.; Hotchkiss, P. J.; Gray, M.;
Rotello, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11249. (d) Uzun, O.; Sanyal,
A.; Nakade, H.; Thibault, R. J.; Rotello, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 14773. (e) Nair, K. P.; Breedveld, V.; Weck, M. Macromolecules
2008, 41, 3429.
information: PS-DAN (5) Mn = 18.5 kDa, PDI = 1.41; PBMA-
DeUG (6) Mn = 24 kDa, PDI = 1.23. Details of the polymer
synthesis and characterization can be found in the SI.
Switching experiments were performed by dissolving PS-DAN
5 and PBMA-DeUG 6 in chloroform at a concentration of
30 g/dL. Upon addition of the solution of 6, the clear, free-
flowing solution of 5 became a viscous gel (Figure 3a). Upon
addition of 1red (ca. 100 equiv per DeUG unit), the gel was
destroyed (Figure 3b). After treatment with salcomine (<0.5 equiv
(3) (a) Blight, B. A.; Camara-Campos, A.; Djurdjevic, S.; Kaller, M.;
Leigh, D. A.; McMillan, F. M.; McNab, H.; Slawin, A. M. Z. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 14116. (b) Blight, B. A.; Hunter, C. A.; Leigh, D. A.;
McNab, H.; Thomson, P. I. T. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 244.
17120
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja2069278 |J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 17118–17121