Table 5 Examination of the nucleophilic catalysts and co-bases for the
KR of ( )-7
Acknowledgements
This study was partially supported by a Research Grant from the
Toray Science Foundation.
References
1 R. Chinchilla, C. Na´jera and P. Sa´nchez-Agullo´, Tetrahedron: Asym-
metry, 1994, 5, 1393.
2 For a recent review, see: D. Leow and C.-H. Tan, Synlett, 2010, 11,
1589, and references cited therein.
Yield
(10b; 7) (%) (%)
ee (10b; 7)
Entry
Catalyst
i-Pr2NEt
s
3 (a) I. Shiina and K. Nakata, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48, 8314; (b) I.
Shiina, K. Nakata, M. Sugimoto, Y. Onda, T. Iizumi and K. Ono,
Heterocycles, 2009, 77, 801; (c) K. Nakata and I. Shiina, Heterocycles,
2010, 80, 169; (d) I. Shiina, K. Nakata, K. Ono, M. Sugimoto and A.
Sekiguchi, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 167.
4 For another example of asymmetric esterification of racemic 1,2-diols,
see: R. Hrdina, C. E. Mu¨ller and P. R. Schreiner, Chem. Commun.,
2010, 46, 2689.
a
1
2
3
4
5
6
(S)-Tetramisole
(S)-Tetramisole
(R)-BTM
—
᭺
—
᭺
—
᭺
38; 62
41; 59
44; 53
47; 53
50; 50
51; 48
91c;48d
33
16
96
35
68
24
b
81c;51d
95; 81
89; 71
92; 87
82; 79
a
b
(R)-BTM
a
(R)-NMBG
(R)-NMBG
b
a Without i-Pr2NEt. b With i-Pr2NEt. c (S)-10b was obtained instead
of forming (R)-10b. d (R)-7 (= 9b) was obtained instead of forming (S)-7
(= 9b).
5 (a) I. Shiina, K. Nakata and Y. Onda, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2008, 5887;
(b) I. Shiina, K. Nakata, K. Ono, Y. Onda and M. Itagaki, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2010, 132, 11629.
6 For another examples of asymmetric esterification of racemic car-
boxylic acids, see: (a) K. Ishihara, Y. Kosugi, S. Umemura and A.
Sakakura, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 3191; (b) A. Sakakura, S. Umemura
and K. Ishihara, Synlett, 2009, 1647; (c) X. Yang and V. B. Birman,
Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 2301.
7 (a) V. B. Birman and X. Li, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 1351; (b) V. B. Birman
and L. Guo, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 4859.
8 (a) V. A. Anisimova, M. V. Levchenko and A. F. Pozharskii, Khim.
Geterotsikl. Soedin., 1986, 7, 918; (b) V. A. Anisimova, M. V. Levchenko
and A. F. Pozharskii, Chem. Heterocycl. Compd., 1986, 22, 732.
9 (a) C. Boga, E. D. Vecchio, L. Forlani and P. E. Todesco, J. Organomet.
Chem., 2000, 601, 233; (b) C. Boga, E. D. Vecchio, L. Forlani, L.
Milanesi and P. E. Todesco, J. Organomet. Chem., 1999, 588, 155.
10 H. B. Kagan and J. C. Fiaud, Top. Stereochem., 1988, 18, 249.
11 All calculations were performed with the program package Spartan ‘08
and the recovered alcohol (7; 50%) were achieved with a good
selectivity (s = 68). It was found that the addition of i-Pr2NEt to
this reaction system decreased the enantioselectivity of the KR of
racemic 7 as shown in Entry 6 (s = 24). Regarding the yields and
the ee’s of not only the desired diphenylacetate 10b, but also the
recovered alcohol 7, the (R)-NMBG-catalyzed KR of the racemic
alcohol 7 without i-Pr2NEt has been determined as the most ef-
fective protocol for the simultaneous formation of the two desired
chiral compounds 10b (92% ee) and 7 (87% ee). It is noteworthy
that the tertiary amine-free reaction conditions in Entry 5 have
the advantage of atom-economy to produce both the chiral ester
10b and the chiral alcohol 7 in very high yields without using an
excess amount of the basic reagent.
In conclusion, (R)-(+)-N-methylbenzoguanidine ((R)-NMBG)
was found to be a new and efficient acyl-transfer catalyst for the
KR of racemic secondary benzylic alcohols with free carboxylic
acids in the presence of pivalic anhydride. This reaction does not
require the use of additional co-bases, such as tertiary amines,
to produce the desired chiral esters in high yields. A variety of
optically active secondary alcohols and their carboxylic esters
were efficiently produced in high ee’s by this novel asymmetric
esterification. Further studies of other utilities of (R)-NMBG are
now in progress in this laboratory.
12 Transition state energies of (R)-ts-1, (S)-ts-2a, and (S)-ts-2b were
also calculated using a polarization function including p functions
on hydrogen atoms (6-31G**), a diffuse function (6-31+G*), and
an advanced combination (6-31+G**), and the following similar re-
sults were obtained. E(R)-ts-1(B3LYP/6-31G**//B3LYP/6-31G*) =
-2130.9227176 au (Erel = 0.00 kcal mol-1), E(S)-ts-2a(B3LYP/6-
31G**//B3LYP/6-31G*) = -2130.9126403 au (Erel = +6.32 kcal mol-1),
E(S)-ts-2b(B3LYP/6-31G**//B3LYP/6-31G*) = -2130.9166457 au
(Erel = +3.81 kcal mol-1); E(R)-ts-1(B3LYP/6-31+G*//B3LYP/6-
31G*)
= -2130.9146371 au (Erel =
0.00 kcal mol-1), E(S)-ts-
2a(B3LYP/6-31+G*//B3LYP/6-31G*) = -2130.9044371 au (Erel
=
+6.40 kcal mol-1), E(S)-ts-2b(B3LYP/6-31+G*//B3LYP/6-31G*) =
-2130.9083136 au (Erel = +3.97 kcal mol-1); E(R)-ts-1(B3LYP/6-
31+G**//B3LYP/6-31G*) = -2130.9862929 au (Erel = 0.00 kcal mol-1),
E(S)-ts-2a(B3LYP/6-31+G**//B3LYP/6-31G*) = -2130.9759809 au
(Erel = +6.47 kcal mol-1), E(S)-ts-2b(B3LYP/6-31+G**//B3LYP/6-
31G*) = -2130.9802310 au (Erel = +3.80 kcal mol-1).
7096 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 7092–7096
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©