containing an acidic proton which can be employed as
nucleophilic reagents have been applied in organic
synthesis,6 to the best of our knowledge, organocatalytic
synthesis of tertiary alcohols based on cyanohydrins,
which have potential utility in organic synthesis CꢀC bond
formations, has been undeveloped.7
which contain a tertiary alcohol moiety, as well as cyanide
and allylic functional groups.
Here, we report the first CAA reaction with MBH
adducts, providing a useful protocol to prepare highly
functionalized cyanohydrins.
To assess the feasibility of an organocatalytic tandem
CAA reaction, an initial investigation was examined
with MBH carbonate 2a and preformed cyanohydrins 1a
which were prepared readily from benzaldehyde and
ethyl cyanoformate in the presence of organic Lewis base
catalysts.9,10 Gratifyingly, this reaction proceeded well
in toluene with a catalytic amount of DABCO (1,4-dia-
zabicyclo[2.2.2]octane) (Table 1, entry 1). Under these
optimized conditions, intermolecular catalytic allylic alky-
lation of MBH adducts with a spectrum of prochiral
cyanohydrins derived from aldehydes was surveyed to
explore the generality of this transformation. The results
are summarized in Table 1. For the cyanohydrins prepared
from aromatic aldehydes with electron-withdrawing or -
donating substituents, the corresponding allylic alkylation
products 3aꢀ3d, 3g were obtained in good to excellent
yields. When cyanohydrins with ortho-substituents at the
aryl group (1e and 1f) were employed, low transformations
and long reactiontimes wereobserved(72h, 17% for3e; 30
h, 42% for 3f), presumably due to a steric hindrance effect.
However, submitting this reaction in acetonitrile provided
3e and 3f in moderate to high yields (Table 1, entries 5, 6).
The allylic alkylation of MBH acetate 2c with cyano-
hydrins 1a failed to give desired product 3a. In contrast
to aromatic analogue 1a, cyanohydrin 1l possessing two
electron-withdrawing groups can smoothly react with
MBH acetate 2c to provide 3l with 95% yield (Table 1,
entries 13, 14), which reveals a dramatic dependence on the
ΔpKa between the conjugate acid of the leaving group and
the pronucleophile. The subsititution of MBH carbonate
2a with heteroaromatic substituted cyanohydrins 1h also
gave rise to desired product 3h in 71% yield. MBH adduct
2d which would allow the generation of vicinal quaternary
and tertiary carbon centers was investigated. Cyanohy-
drins 1a reacted with 2d to furnish desired product 3r in
high yield with low diastereoselectivity (dr: 1/1, Table 1,
entry 15). Furthermore, O-protected derivatives such as
O-acetyl, O-benzoyl, and O-trimethylsilyl cyanohydrins
have been investigated. O-Acetyl and O-benzoyl cyano-
hydrins readily reacted with MBH carbonate 2a to afford
desired products (Table 1, entries 10, 11), while O-TMS
cyanohydrin 1k did not provided any desired product
under standard reaction conditions (Table 1, entry 12).
As a further demonstration of the scope of this reac-
tion, catalytic allylic alkylation of MBH adducts 2 with
Figure 1. Strategy of tandem cyanationꢀallylic alkylation
reaction.
Recently, the metal-free Lewis base catalyzed substitu-
tion of MBH adducts has emerged as a powerful tool for
preparing multifunctional compounds.8 This approach
normally relies on a tandem SN20/SN20substitution se-
quence to access allylic product. We envisioned that these
two distinct chemical transformations could be triggered
by one or more organocatalysts, therefore creating a new
CꢀC bond formation in a sequential way which may
deliver substantial increases in molecular complexity via
single-pot operations without the need for intermediate
workups or purifications, since they share similar or the
same catalysts and reaction environment. As outlined in
Figure 1, initial O-substituted cyanohydrins I from alde-
hydes would be generated by an organocatalyst in situ.
Subsequently, the deprotonation of the acidic CH group of
cyanohydrins by the oxygen-based anion generated in situ
would occur, and selective allylic alkylation would follow
to deliver valuable densely functionalized products II,
(6) For reviews, see: (a) Albright, J. D. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 3207.
For selected examples in organic synthesis, see: (b) Moritani, Y.;
Fukushima, C.; Ukita, T.; Miyagishima, T.; Ohmizu, H.; Iwasaki, T.
J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6922. (c) Katritzky, A. R.; Zhang, G.; Jiang, J.
J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7589.
(7) Pd-catalyzed allylic alkylation of prochiral cyanohydrins: Tsuji,
J.; Shimizu, I.; Minami, I.; Ohashi, Y.; Sugiura, T.; Takahashi, K.
J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1523.
(8) For selected examples, see: (a) Cho, C.-W.; Krische, M. J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6689. (b) Du, Y.; Han, X.; Lu, X. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 4967. (c) Cho, C.-W.; Kong, J.-R.; Krische, M. J. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 1337. (d) van Steenis, D. J. V. C.; Marcelli, T.; Lutz, M.;
Spek, A. L.; van Maarseveen, J. H.; Hiemstra, H. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2007, 349, 281. (e) Jiang, Y.-Q.; Shi, Y.-L.; Shi, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 7202. (f) Cui, H.-L.; Feng, X.; Peng, J.; Lei, J.; Jiang, K.;
Chen, Y.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5737. (g) Cui, H.-L.; Peng,
J.; Feng, X.; Du, W.; Jiang, K.; Chen, Y.-C. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15,
1574. (h) Jiang, K.; Peng, J.; Cui, H.-L.; Chen, Y.-C. Chem. Commun.
2009, 3955. (i) Feng, X.; Yuan, Y.-Q.; Cui, H.-L.; Jiang, K.; Chen, Y.-C.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 3660. (j) Cui, H.-L.; Huang, J.-R.; Lei, J.;
Wang, Z.-F.; Chen, S.; Wu, L.; Chen, Y.-C. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 720. (k)
Huang, J.-R.; Cui, H.-L.; Lei, J.; Sun, X.-H.; Chen, Y.-C. Chem.
Commun. 2011, 4784. (l) Hong, L.; Sun, W. S.; Liu, C. X.; Zhao,
D. P.; Wang, R. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2856. (m) Sun, W. S.; Hong,
L.; Liu, C. X.; Wang, R. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3914. (n) Jiang, L.; Lei, Q.;
Huang, X.; Cui, H. L.; Zhou, X.; Chen, Y.-C. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17,
9489. (o) Yang, W.; Wei, X.; Pan, Y.; Lee, R.; Zhu, B.; Liu, H.; Yan, L.;
Huang, K. W.; Jiang, Z.; Tan, C. H. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 8066.
(9) For examples of synthesis of racemic O-carbonylated cyanohy-
drins using nonchiral tertiary amines, see: (a) Hoffmann, H. M. R.;
Ismail, Z. M.; Hollweg, R.; Zein, A. R. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63,
1807. (b) Poirier, D.; Berthiaume, D.; Boivin, R. P. Synlett 1999, 1423.
(c) Berthiaume, D.; Poirier, D. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 5995. (d) Deardorff,
D. R.; Taniguchi, C. M.; Tafti, S. A.; Kim, H. Y.; Choi, S. Y.; Downey,
K. J.; Nguyen, T. V. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7191. (e) Aoki, S.; Kotani,
S.; Sugiura, M.; Nakajima, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3547. (f)
Baeza, A.; Najera, C.; Retamosa, M. G.; Sansano, J. M. Synthesis 2005,
16, 2787.
(10) See Supporting Information for details.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 23, 2011
6165