addition, the optical properties of BODIPY are tunable
through chemical modifications on the dye core.6 These favor-
able features render BODIPY as widely used as a fluorophore
core for construction of fluorescent labels,7 sensors,8 light
harvesting systems,9 and photodynamic therapy agents.10
Coumarins are a classic type of pushꢀpull dye, in which
the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) process from the
electron donor to the acceptor proceeds upon excitation.
Typically, for the efficient ICT, the donor and acceptor are
located in the 7- and 3-position, respectively.11 On the
other hand, it is known that BODIPY dyes undergo an
ICT process with a functional group at the 30-position.12
ICT is an effective signaling mechanism employed in the
design of ratiometric fluorescent sensors.13 Thus, we envi-
sioned that ratiometric fluorescent sensors for fluoride
anions could be constructed by exploiting the ICT proper-
ties of both coumarin and BODIPY dyes. In this work, we
present compound 4 based on a new BODIPY-coumarin
platform as a novel candidate for ratiometric fluorescent
fluoride sensing (Scheme 1). A triisopropylsilyl group was
chosen as the potential reaction site for fluoride anions
owing to the high affinity of fluoride to silicon.14 The
triisopropylsilyl group is judiciously placed in the 7-posi-
tion of the coumarin unit. Upon reaction with fluoride
anions, the triisopropylsilyl group may be unmasked, and
compound 4 could be converted into the deprotected
product (compound 3 in the phenolate form).4iꢀm,15 As
the phenolate group is a much stronger electron donor
than the triisopropylsilyl group, the ICT efficiency should
be markedly modulated upon interactions of compound 4
with fluoride anions. In addition, notably, the BODIPY-
coumarin platform was carefully designed. With the trii-
sopropylsilyl group positioned in the 7-position, the BOD-
IPY wasrationallyplaced inthe 3-positionof the coumarin
unit for effective ICT. Thus, the coumarin unit is located in
the 30-position of the BODIPY dye, consistent with the
typical design of ICT-based BODIPY sensors.12
Scheme 1. Design and Synthesis of Coumarin-BODIPY Con-
jugate 4 As a New Ratiometric Fluorescent Fluoride Sensor
The coumarin-BODIPY-based compound 4 was readily
synthesized in two steps (Scheme 1). The starting materials
BODIPY 1 and coumarin aldehyde 2 were prepared
based on the reported procedures.6b,16 Condensation of
BODIPY 1 with coumarin aldehyde 2 afforded the key
intermediate 3, which was further reacted with chlorotrii-
sopropylsilane to give product 4. All the new compounds
were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS.
(7) Haugland, R. P. The Handbook-A Guide to Fluorescent Probesand
Labeling Technologies, 10th ed.; Invitrogen Corp.: 2005.
(8) (a) Boens, N.; Leen, V.; Dehaen, W. Chem. Soc. Rev., DOI:
10.1039/c1cs15132k. (b) Kamiya, M.; Johnsson, K. Anal. Chem. 2010,
82, 6472–6479. (c) Rosenthal, J.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 5536–5537. (d) Sun, Z.-N.; Wang, H.-L.; Liu, F.-Q.; Chen, Y.;
Kwong, P.; Tam, H.; Yang, D. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1887–1890. (e) Ojida,
A.; Sakamoto, T.; Inoue, M.; Fujishima, S.; Lippens, G.; Hamachi, I.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6543–6548. (f) Matsumoto, T.; Urano, Y.;
Shoda, T.; Kojima, H.; Nagano, T. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3375–3377.
(g) Kennedy, D. P.; Kormos, C. M.; Burdette, S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 8578–8586.
(9) (a) Ziessel, R.; Harriman, A. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 611–631.
(b) Zhang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Qian, X. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 29–32.
(10) Atilgan, S.; Ekmekci, Z.; Dogan, A. L.; Guc, D.; Akkaya, E. U.
Chem. Commun. 2006, 4398–4400.
Figure 1. Absorption (A) and fluorescence (B) spectra of sensor
4 (3 μM) in DMSO in the presence of Fꢀ anions (0ꢀ300 equiv).
Excitation at 420 nm. The inset shows the fluorescence intensity
ratio (I472 /I606) as a function of equiv of fluoride anions.
ꢂ
(11) (a) Signore, G.; Nifosi, R.; Albertazzi, L.; Storti, B.; Bizzarri, R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1276–1288. (b) Wang, J.; Qian, X.; Cui, J.
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4308–4311.
€
(12) (a) Deniz, E.; Isbasar, G. C.; Bozdemir, O . A.; Yildirim, T. L.;
Siemiarczuk, A.; Akkaya, E. U. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3401–3403.
(b) Peng, X.; Du, J.; Fan, J.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Sun, S.; Xu,
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1500–1501.
(13) Lakowicz, J. R. Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Vol. 4:
Probe Design and Chemical Sensing; Kluwer Academic Publishers:
New York, 2002.
(14) Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; Greene, T. W.,
Wuts, P. G. M., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1999; pp 113ꢀ148.
With compound 4 in hand, we evaluated its response to
Fꢀ anions by absorption and emission spectroscopy. The
free sensor 4 displayed two major absorption bands at 398
and 592 nm. However, addition of Fꢀ induced a large
red shift in both the absorption peaks (Figure 1A), con-
sistent with the ICT signaling mechanism as designed.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 22, 2011
6099