Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 1299–1303.
References
yield (Scheme 2). In principle, Ugi reactions are also possible,
as illustrated with the formation of 9, although the yield was
significantly lower in this case and the products are formed as a
1:1 diastereomeric mixture.
1. Ramón, D. J.; Yus, M. Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 1628–1661.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1602–1634.
2. Zhu, J.; Bienaymé, H., Eds. Multicomponent reactions; Wiley:
Weinheim, Germany, 2005.
3. Dolle, R. E.; Le Bourdonnec, B.; Morales, G. A.; Moriarty, K. J.;
Salvino, J. M. J. Comb. Chem. 2006, 8, 597–635.
4. Touré, B. B.; Hall, D. G. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4439–4486.
5. Isambert, N.; Lavilla, R. Chem.–Eur. J. 2008, 14, 8444–8454.
6. Candeias, N. R.; Montalbano, F.; Cal, P. M. S. D.; Gois, P. M. P.
8. El Kaim, L.; Grimaud, L. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2153–2171.
9. Passerini, M. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1921, 51-2, 126–129.
10.Banfi, L.; Riva, R. The Passerini Reaction. Organic Reactions; Wiley:
New Jersey, 2005; Vol. 65, pp 1–140.
11.Ugi, I.; Steinbrückner, C. Chem. Ber. 1961, 94, 734–742.
12.Kazmaier, U.; Maier, S.; Zumpe, F. L. Synlett 2000, 11, 1523–1535.
13.Deska, J.; Kazmaier, U. Curr. Org. Chem. 2008, 12, 355–385.
Scheme 2: Passerini and Ugi reaction of saturated aldehyde 7.
14.Schmidt, C.; Kazmaier, U. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 4643–4648.
Conclusion
15.Kazmaier, U.; Schmidt, C. Synlett 2009, 1136–1140.
In conclusion, we showed that the ring opening of epoxides,
either directly or Pd-catalyzed, with chelated enolates combined
with Passerini reactions is a suitable tool for the synthesis of
highly functionalized α-hydroxy and α-amino acid derivatives.
These new compounds are interesting building blocks for
peptide-derived drugs. Attempts to improve the yields and to
evaluate the scope and limitations are currently underway.
16.Kazmaier, U.; Hebach, C. Synlett 2003, 1591–1594.
17.Pick, R.; Bauer, M.; Kazmaier, U.; Hebach, C. Synlett 2005, 5,
18.Kazmaier, U.; Ackermann, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 3184–3187.
19.Kazmaier, U.; Persch, A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 5442–5447.
20.Hebach, C.; Kazmaier, U. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2003,
Supporting Information
21.Kazmaier, U.; Hebach, C.; Watzke, A.; Maier, S.; Mues, H.; Huch, V.
22.Kazmaier, U.; Maier, S. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 941–954.
Supporting Information features detailed experimental
procedures, NMR as well as analytical data of all
compounds.
23.Krebs, A.; Kazmaier, U. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 7945–7946.
Supporting Information File 1
Experimental section.
24.Kazmaier, U. Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 317–328.
25.Zahoor, A. F.; Kazmaier, U. Synthesis 2011, 7, 1059–1066.
26.Kazmaier, U.; Zahoor, A. F. ARKIVOC 2011, IV, 6–16.
27.Mancuso, A. J.; Huang, S.-L.; Swern, D. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43,
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemein-
schaft. A. F. Zahoor thanks the DAAD and HEC (Pakistan) for
a PhD fellowship.
28.Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155–4156.
29.Thies, S.; Kazmaier, U. Synlett 2010, 1, 137–141.
1302