M. Shahid, A. Misra / Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 335 (2017) 190–199
191
acidity and basicity of two complementary centers due to which
ultrafast migration of proton through hydrogen bond
a
a
coordinate is possible to develop photo-tautomers each having
different and specific electronic distribution and optical properties
accordingly.
Furthermore, the most of anion recognition studies involve
hydrogen bond interaction between the anion and receptor
molecule. Also, the sensing ability of a specific receptor system
depends on the affinity of interaction with a guest species,
geometry of the molecule/complex, physico-organic nature of
analytes and microenvironment. Therefore, harnessing the ESIPT
process for development of new anion binding signaling systems
seems promising [9]. In view of the fact that anions like,
carboxylate, fluoride and phosphate play significant roles in
chemical, environmental and biochemical processes [10,11].
Particularly, carboxylates are critical components for numerous
metabolic processes [11c] and exhibit specific biochemical
behavior in enzymes and antibodies. Therefore, the design and
synthesis of effective small organic molecular scaffolds having a
suitable receptor site to recognize specific analyte sensitively
through good output optical signal are in great demand and
interesting in the area of supramolecular chemistry [10].
In this communication, to study the ESIPT mechanism we have
developed phenanthroimidazole based molecular probes 3 and 4
that are capable to show strong intramolecular H-bonding,
solvatochromism and photo-enolization processes. The potential
probe 3 is conjugated with naphthalene moiety for extending
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 3–5. (i) Na2Cr2O7/AcOH/D, (ii) AcONH4/aldehyde/EtOH/D.
on excitation at ꢁ365/362 nm respectively. While 5 exhibited
emission maxima at 421 nm with a lesser Stokes’ shift on excitation
at 360 nm.
2.2. Solvatochromism
p
–conjugation to gain large Stokes’ shift (useful to avoid self-
absorption), better electronic transition from keto tautomer with
enhanced energy gap between ground and excited state, and
quantum yield and sensitive to detect specific anion. The chemical
design of compounds 3 and 4 are based on hydroxyl imidazole
system to promote intramolecular H-bonding between ꢀꢀOH and
2.2.1. Steady-state UV–vis absorption and emission spectra
The solvent dependent analysis was monitored for 3, 4 and 5 in
different non-polar, polar aprotic and polar protic solvents such as
hexane, DCM, MeCN, DMSO, MeCN/H2O and MeOH which has been
summarized in Table 1. The UV–vis absorption spectra of 3 and 4
exhibits hypsochromic shift (blue shift) on increasing solvent
polarity i.e. hexane to MeOH (Fig. S13). Absorption maxima of 3
appeared at 373 and 374 nm in hexane and DCM, respectively. In
MeCN and DMSO absorption maxima obtained at 370 and 368 nm
while in MeCN/H2O and MeOH, it was found at 365 and 360 nm. For
4 and 5, similar trends were observed in absorption spectra and
absorption maxima appeared at 337-332 and 314–308 nm from
non-polar to polar protic solvents respectively (Fig. S14, 15).
Fluorescent behavior of molecular receptors 3-5 were evaluated
in solvents of different polarities (Fig. S16-20). In non-polar/less
polar solvents, the emissions maxima of 3 appeared at ꢁ524 nm (in
DCM) and at ꢁ495 nm (in hexane). In MeCN and DMSO, the
emission band appeared at 518 and 507 nm respectively whereas,
in polar protic solvent (MeOH), it appeared at 482 nm (Fig. S16).
Similarly, the emissions spectra of 4 showed dual emission bands
at ꢁ420 and ꢁ530 nm due to intramolecular charge transfer (ICT)
and ESIPT processes, respectively. The emission spectra in hexane
shows maxima at 515 nm whereas, in DCM, MeCN and DMSO it
appeared at 533, 523 and 533 nm, respectively (Fig. S17). Thus in
hexane, DCM, MeCN, DMSO and MeOH solutions, the observed
blue emission band is possibly for enol tautomer while, the longer
wavelength emission is attributed to a keto tautomer as a result of
ESIPT mechanism [1a,8b,c].The emission band in MeOH blue
shifted to appear at 514 nm and is similar to the data obtained from
already reported probes demonstrating ESIPT [13c,14]. The
observed photophysical changes may be rationalized to the
intermolecular hydrogen bonding with methanol molecule leading
to the stabilization of solvated isomer making the ESIPT reaction of
3 and 4 slower via a proton-relay (Scheme 2) [8b].
¼Nꢀꢀ functions through a stable six membered cyclic ring and
stability in host-guest interaction. The synthesized model com-
pound 5 due to the absence of ꢀꢀOH function is unable to exhibit
photo-enolization. The probes 3 and 4 are able to recognize acetate
ions selectively through a change in color, UV–vis, fluorescence and
1H NMR spectra. Probe 3 on interaction with AcOꢀ induces a
fluorescence “turn-Off” and “turn-On” behavior when excited at
365 and 411 nm respectively with a high association constant and
favorable response time.
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Synthesis
The synthesis (Scheme 1) of o-hydroxynaphthyl phenanthroi-
midazole (3), o-hydroxyphenyl phenanthroimidazole (4) and
benzyl phenanthroimidazole (5) have been carried by reacting
9,10-phenanthroquinone, 2 in ethanol with corresponding alde-
hyde (2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde, salicylaldehyde and benzal-
dehyde respectively) in presence of ammonium acetate (AcONH4)
and iodine (as catalyst). Compound 2 was obtained in good yield by
the oxidation of phenanthrene, 1 with Na2Cr2O7 in acetic acid. All
the derivatives were characterized by different spectroscopic data
analysis (Fig. S1-12).
The UV–vis absorption spectrum of 3, 4 and 5 (1
aqueous-MeCN (20%, v/v) shows absorption bands at lmax 365, 362
and 359 nm (
= 23066, 30370, 13911 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1) along with high
energy bands at 318, 331 and 311 nm, respectively. The low energy,
n ! * electronic transition band appeared at lmax ꢁ 365 nm is
ascribed to charge transfer (CT) while the high energy band
observed may be attributed to * electronic transitions [12].
mM) in
e
p
Moreover, the observed colorimetric changes for probe 3 and 4
under UV light is probably due to variable ratio between keto and
enol emissions in different solutions (Fig. S19). Probe 5 shows the
p
!
p
The emission spectra of 3 and 4 illustrated emission maxima at
lem ꢁ 464 nm with Stokes’ shift of 1.01 ꢂ105 and 1.05 ꢂ105 cmꢀ1