Table 2. Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]
tassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (KHMDS; 2.5 equiv) and
the Comins triflating reagent.[12] Finally, a Suzuki cross-cou-
pling reaction of bistriflate 6 with a number of arylboronic
acids, in the presence of [Pd
ACHTUGNRTEN(NUGN PPh3)4], provided 2,5-disubsti-
tuted bicyclo[2.2.1]heptadienes 3 in moderate to high yields
(Scheme 1).
With bicyclic diene ligands 3a–h in hand, the Rh-cata-
lyzed enantioselective conjugate addition reaction was stud-
ied (Table 1). Initially, a model reaction of (E)-5-methylhex-
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
Entry
x [mol%]
Solvent
Base
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
1.0
0.5
0.1
0.05
dioxane
THF
diglyme
MeOH
EtOH
IPA
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
Et3N
DIPA
DBACO
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
87
72
67
63
98
93
91
94
90
8
94
94
96
96
95
96
96
96
95
65
96
96
96
96
Table 1. Ligand effects.[a]
8[d]
9[d]
10[d]
11[d]
12[d]
13[d]
14[d,e]
94
94
90
73[f]
Entry
Ligand
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3 f
3g
3h
91
90
72
100
87
89
93
77
78
83
94
83
91
88
Et3N
[a] Reaction conditions: 7a (0.2 mmol), 8a (0.4 mmol), [{RhClACHTUNGTRENNUNG(C2H4)2}2]
(x mol% of Rh), ligand 3e (1.2x mol%), and aqueous KOH (50 mol%).
All reactions were conducted under an Argon atmosphere at room tem-
perature for 1 h. [b] Calibrated GC yield by using n-decane as the inter-
nal standard. [c] Determined by chiral HPLC. [d] 2.4 equivalents of base
was used. [e] The reaction was conducted for 22 h with 12 mmol of enone
7a. [f] Isolated yield.
85
74
[a] Reaction conditions: 7a (0.2 mmol), 8a (0.4 mmol), [{RhClACTHNUGTRNE(UNG C2H4)2}2]
(3 mol% of Rh), ligand (3.6 mol%), and aqueous KOH (50 mol%). All
reactions were conducted under an Argon atmosphere at room tempera-
ture for 1 h. [b] Calibrated GC yield by using n-decane as the internal
standard. [c] Determined by chiral HPLC.
We anticipated that high asymmetric induction could be
maintained as the loading of the catalytically active complex
was reduced under otherwise identical reaction conditions
to those in Table 2, entry 8.[4r,13] Therefore, further optimiza-
tion of the catalyst loading was studied. In the presence of
1 mol% of diene complex RhI–3e, the addition of 8a to
enone 7a in ethanol with Et3N as the base yielded 94% of
compound 9aa in 96% ee (Table 2, entry 11). In the pres-
ence of 0.5 or 0.1 mol% of the catalyst, the reaction gave
the desired adduct without losing the high catalytic activity
and enantioselectivity (Table 2, entries 12 and 13). Notably,
with merely 0.05 mol% of the catalyst, the asymmetric reac-
tion of nucleophile 8a with 7a smoothly yielded the desired
adduct in 73% isolated yield and 96% ee (Table 2,
entry 14).[14]
In light of the above observations, the addition of various
arylboronic acids to a range of acceptors was examined.[15]
As indicated in Table 3, the addition of arylboronic acids,
with either electron-donating or -withdrawing substituents,
to enone 7a gave the corresponding adducts 9aa–ag with
high enantioselectivities and yields (Table 3, entries 1–7).
Highly asymmetric induction and high yields were also ob-
served if the reactions were conducted by using a set of aryl-
boronic acids with receptor 7b, which contains a linear alkyl
group at the b position (Table 3, entries 8–13). Notably,
when 4-CF3- and 4-Me-substituted phenylboronic acids were
used, a >99.5% ee of adducts 9bf and 9bi (Table 3, en-
tries 10 and 12, respectively) was obtained. To further probe
the substrate scope of this catalytic system, the reactions of
b-aryl-a,b-unsaturated ketones and a,b-unsaturated esters
were studied. Excellent enantioselectivities (94–96% ee) and
yields were achieved in the catalytic addition of phenylbor-
3-en-2-one (7a) with phenylboronic acid (8a) in the pres-
ence of RhI–3a (3 mol%) in dioxane was conducted. Grati-
fyingly, the isolation of (R)-5-methyl-4-phenylhexan-2-one
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG(9aa) in 91% yield and 93% ee was observed (Table 1,
entry 1). When diene ligands containing alkyl or phenyl sub-
stituents at the 4-position of the benzene ring (3b–d) were
used, the enantioselectivities were significantly reduced (77–
83% ee; Table 1, entries 2–4); utilizing ligands with electron-
withdrawing aryl groups (3g and h) gave rise to asymmetric
induction (88–91% ee) to a slightly lower extent than that
obtained by using ligand 3a (Table 1, entries 7 and 8, respe-
cively). A slight improvement in enantioinduction (94% ee)
was observed by replacing both substituted phenyl groups
with the sterically bulky 1-naphthyl group (3e). Given this
encouraging result, the reaction conditions were optimized
by using ligand 3e.
Next, we investigated the effect of the solvent on the re-
action (Table 2). Reactions in ethereal solvents typically
provided adduct 9aa in moderate to high yields with enan-
tioselectivities up to 96% ee (Table 2, entries 1–4). The yield
of 9aa was improved to 98% without diminishing selectivity
if the reaction was carried out in alcohol solvents (Table 2,
entries 5–7). Substituting the aqueous KOH solution for trie-
thylamine (2.4 equiv) as the base afforded a comparable ee
value and higher yield (94%; Table 2, entry 8), whereas the
use of diisopropylamine (DIPA) or 1,4-diazabicyclo-
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
11406
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 11405 – 11409