ARTICLES
Me
Me
Me
oligomers and polymers. This problem was solved using high
dilution conditions (running the reaction at ꢀ0.01 M) and by
the slow addition of substrate 16 to the Lewis acid solution (see
Supplementary Information).
Developing a scalable route to the taxane core involved the study
and modification of fundamental aspects of the described chemistry,
rather than a mere exercise in scaling up. The conciseness of the
synthetic route is a direct result of trying to achieve a scalable
synthesis, and the reliability of the yields attests to the small
variability of reactions run on a larger scale50.
Me
8
C: Shapiro/aldol/
Diels–Alder
Me
Me
Me
Me
8
A: RCM
1
Me
O
H
Me
H
H
O
Me
O
Me
Me
18
20
D: later-stage
1,4-addition at
C8
Me
Me
X
Me
8
H
8
3
B: aldol
Me
O
(+)-6
Me
Me
Me
Me
1
2
'Taxadienone'
14
H
O
O
O
21
19
X = H or R3Si
Despite the efficiency of the described approach, there are two
obvious limitations in the synthesis of taxadienone (6): (i) the
single functional group manipulation from cyclized diketone 17 to
the corresponding enol triflate (rendering the route 85% rather
than 100% ideal)42 and (ii) the 2:1 diastereoselectivity in the aldol
reaction of 14 and acrolein. These issues are currently being
addressed by (i) developing a scalable, one-step enol triflation/
methyl coupling reaction and (ii) generating creative acrolein
equivalents and/or reaction conditions with various additives to
increase the diastereoselectivity of the aldol step.
Figure 4 | Initial synthetic investigations towards the synthesis of
taxadienone (6). Disconnection A: an RCM approach would require many
more steps in building the taxane framework. Disconnection B: the required
aldol closure simply did not proceed. Disconnection C: a Shapiro reaction,
followed by aldol and Diels–Alder reactions, is strategically similar to the
successful synthetic route, but the stereochemistry at C8 could not be set
stereoselectively. Disconnection D: conjugate addition at C8 to install the
methyl unit did not proceed, because only the undesired conjugate addition
onto C14 occurred.
In summary, a scalable, enantioselective entry to the taxane
family of natural products was achieved in only seven steps from
commercially available starting material (18–20% overall yield).
This triply convergent approach to taxa-4(5),11(12)-dien-2-one
(6) allowed for a minimization of concession steps, in which 6 of
7 steps formed skeletal (C–C) bonds. Every one of these steps
was performed on a gram scale, attesting to the scalability and
robustness of the sequence. Furthermore, (þ)-taxadiene (7) was
because reaction first occurred at the less hindered C14, even when a
large tert-butyldiphenylsilyl group was appended at C14. After
many more strategic revisions and success in forming the required
C2–C3 bond from TMS enol ether 14 using Gd(OTf)3, the final
synthetic strategy depicted in Fig. 2 was realized.
Tactically, although quite efficient at present, most steps shown
in Fig. 2 were initially difficult to scale and suffered from low and synthesized, enabling further structural confirmation, as well as
inconsistent yields. Even the first transformation from 8 to 10 the first optical rotation determination of this natural product.
(Fig. 2) was not trivial, despite it being a known two-step transform- The simple chemical route to (þ)-7 nicely complements the
ation35,40,41. Modifying the reaction stoichiometry and reaction recent pioneering studies of Stephanopoulos and co-workers22
,
whose bioengineering strategy also delivers gram-scale quantities
of (þ)-7, albeit as a 9:1 mixture of olefin isomers (taxa-
4(5),11(12)-diene (7) and taxa-4(20),11(12)-diene) (see
Supplementary Information). Studies are currently under way to
make use of the existing functional group handles in 6 to oxidize
various sites on the taxane skeleton and to create a pyramid-like
library of unnatural and natural taxanes en route to Taxol (1).
times was necessary to coax this process into giving good yields
consistently on a decagram scale, with eventual success as a one-
pot operation. The second transformation, a merging of the two
similar-sized fragments 10 and 11, can be conducted in good
yields (86%) on a decagram scale, but initially this reaction was
plagued with inconsistent yields due to side-product formation:
.
the original reaction conditions of tert-butyllithium, BF3 OEt2 and
CuI resulted in 1,6-addition of tert-butyllithium (whereas sec-butyl-
lithium is not a very competent nucleophile for this reaction), iodi-
nation of 12 (whereas the use of CuBr SMe2 circumvents this
Received 22 August 2011; accepted 10 October 2011;
published online 6 November 2011
.
problem), and deconjugation of 12 to give a b,g-unsaturated
ketone (this problem was rectified by optimizing the work-up
procedure; see Supplementary Information). The third, asymme-
try-inducing step43 from 12 to 14 was straightforward when run
on a small scale (,100 mg) and delivered high enantioselectivity
with 0.5 mol% CuTC and 1 mol% ligand loading. However, on
increasing the reaction scale to a gram scale, the reaction conversion
suffered significantly. Eventually, a higher catalyst loading (2 mol%
CuTC and 4 mol% ligand) and precise temperature control allowed
this reaction to give reliable yields and consistent enantioselectivity
on a gram scale. Also worth mentioning is a modified quenching
procedure that was developed to address the troublesome TMS
trapping of the aluminium enolate43 (vide supra).
The fourth and the most difficult reaction was the aldol reaction
of 14 and acrolein, which only returned desilylated ketone 15 under
most reaction conditions. Avariety of Lewis acid-mediated reactions
(vide supra), as well as anionic silicon–metal exchange reactions,
never led to the desired product. This aldol reaction only proceeded
when lanthanide triflates such as Yb(OTf)3 or Gd(OTf)3 and very
specific solvent systems were used. The final challenge was a scalable
Diels–Alder reaction from 16 to 17, which has been known to
proceed in moderate yields on similar substrates35–37. Although
efficient on a small scale, the yield decreased when the reaction
was conducted on a gram scale, possibly due to the formation of
References
1. Heusler, F. The Chemistry of the Terpenes. (P. Blakiston’s Son & Co., 1902).
2. Breitmaier, E. Terpenes: Flavors, Fragrances, Pharmaca, Pheromones
(Wiley-VCH, 2006).
3. Maimone, T. J. & Baran, P. S. Modern synthetic efforts toward biologically active
terpenes. Nature Chem. Biol. 3, 396–407 (2007).
4. Schiff, P. B., Fant, J. & Horwitz, S. B. Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro
by taxol. Nature 277, 665–667 (1979).
5. Suffness, M. TAXOLw: Science and Applications (CRC Press, 1995).
6. Itokawa, H. & Lee, K.-H. Taxus: The Genus Taxus (Taylor & Francis, 2003).
7. Wani, M. C., Taylor, H. L., Wall, M. E., Coggon, P. & McPhail, A. T. Plant
antitumor agents. VI. Isolation and structure of taxol, a novel antileukemic and
antitumor agent from Taxus brevifolia. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 2325–2327 (1971).
8. Denis, J. N. et al. Highly efficient, practical approach to natural taxol. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 110, 5917–5919 (1988).
9. Holton, R. A. Method for preparation of taxol. European patent EP0400971
(A2) (1990).
10. Ojima, I. et al. New and efficient approaches to the semisynthesis of taxol and its
C-13 side chain analogs by means of b-lactam synthon method. Tetrahedron 48,
6985–7012 (1992).
11. Nicolaou, K. C. et al. Total synthesis of taxol. Nature 367, 630–634 (1994).
12. Holton, R. A. et al. First total synthesis of taxol. 1. Functionalization of the B
ring. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 1597–1598 (1994).
13. Holton, R. A. et al. First total synthesis of taxol. 2. Completion of the C and D
rings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 1599–1600 (1994).
14. Masters, J. J., Link, J. T., Snyder, L. B., Young, W. B. & Danishefsky, S. J. A total
synthesis of taxol. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 34, 1723–1726 (1995).
24
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.