reductive elimination of the Pd(II) species to regenerate the
catalyst.1,2
Table 1. Optimization Studies for the Domino Reaction
Recently, we studied the formation of chromans and
isochromans in a Pd-catalyzed domino reaction starting
from carbohydrate derivatives.6,7 To achieve this goal we
utilized a twofold carbopalladation process followed by a
ring closure and elimination of the Pd species. A similar
annulation of a benzene ring was previously published by
Grigg.8 However, a very special pattern of heteroatoms
proved to be the prerequisite for a successful outcome
(see Scheme 1). Recently, also intermolecular twofold
carbopalladations of diynes with aromatic cores were
explored.9
Catalyst/
Ligand
(mol %)
Base
Yield
(%)
Entry
(equiv)
Solvent
We started our investigations with the diyne 3a as a
model compound to yield naphthalene derivatives similar
to compounds obtained by Grigg. In contrast, our sub-
strates consist of a butano tether between the two alkyne
moieties. Furthermore, 3a contains an O-linked diyne
chain without any donor functionality at the terminus to
force a ring closure by CÀH activation.10 While carrying
out the reaction with 3a, surprisingly, we detected as the
only isolable product a molecule embodying a furan
moiety and two alkene units. A benzene annulation, as
originally anticipated, did not take place.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Pd(PPh3)4 (10)
Pd(PPh3)4 (10)
Pd(PPh3)4 (10)
Pd(PPh3)4 (10)
Pd(PPh3)4 (10)
Pd(PPh3)4 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
PPh3 (20)
HNiPr (5)
HNiPr (5)
HNiPr (5)
LiOAc (5)
Cs2CO3 (5)
CsF (5)
MeCN
35
56a
54
20
75
75
52
dioxane
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
Cs2CO3 (5)
8
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
dppe (20)
Cs2CO3 (5)
Cs2CO3 (5)
CsF (10)
toluene
toluene
toluene
64
62
80
9
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Josiphos (20)
Pd(PPh3)4 (10)
10
a Inseparable impurities occurred.
Scheme 1. Domino Reaction by Grigg et al.
was optionally accomplished by a hydroxy functionality
or an acetylated amine, but also hydroxymethyl groups
were successfully employed. At the terminus of the diyne
chain an aryl group, either electron-rich (with OMe groups)
or electron-poor (with F substituents or even pyridine
units), was installed. With the exception of one example
(3e) the tether between the two triple bonds consisted of
four methylene units. Our investigations revealed that the
desired transformations proceeded smoothly and yielded
the products in up to 80% yield. By utilizing this domino
reaction we were able to access benzofurans 4aÀ4d, iso-
chromenes 4eÀ4f, pyridinofurans 4gÀ4h, and indoles
4iÀ4k respectively (Scheme 2).11 Limitations were ob-
served in terms of terminal (H-substituted) diynes; in
these cases no product formation was observed. With
propano tethers between the alkyne moieties mostly in-
separable mixtures of compounds were obtained (with the
exception of 4e).
Encouraged by this unexpected result we performed an
intensive screening of various Pd sources, ligands, bases,
and solvents. Some results of the optimization are com-
piled in Table 1. The most efficient catalytic system for the
transformation of 3a into 4a turned out to be Pd(PPh3)4,
CsF in toluene at 110 °C (entry 10).
With the optimal reaction conditions for 3a in hand, the
scope of this Pd-catalyzed domino process was explored
with a variety of diynyl-substituted bromoarenes of type 3
(see Supporting Information for their syntheses). The
arene was either a benzene or a pyridine derivative. The
attachment of the diyne chain to the six-membered ring
To our delight, two structures of these domino pro-
ducts could also be proven unambiguously by X-ray
(6) (a) Leibeling, M.; Koester, D. C.; Pawliczek, M.; Schild, S. C.;
Werz, D. B. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 199–201. (b)Leibeling, M.;Koester,
D. C.; Pawliczek, M.; Kratzert, D.; Dittrich, B.; Werz, D. B. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2010, 18, 3656–3667. (c) Koester, D. C.; Holkenbrink, A.; Werz,
D. B. Synthesis 2010, 3217–3242.
(7) Leibeling, M.; Milde, B.; Kratzert, D.; Stalke, D.; Werz, D. B.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 9888–9892.
(8) Grigg, R.; Loganathan, V.; Sridharan, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 3399–3402.
(9) (a) Hu, Y.; Yao, H.; Sun, Y.; Wan, J.; Lin, X.; Zhu, T. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2010, 16, 7635–7641. (b) Hu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Hu, J.; Zhu, T.; Yu, T.;
Zhao, Q. Chem.;Asian J. 2011, 6, 797–800.
(11) For recent representative syntheses of benzofurans, isochro-
menes, and indoles: (a) Tan, Y.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 3676–3677. (b) Liang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Xi, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
ꢁ
2011, 133, 9204–9207. (c) Barluenga, J.; Fernandez, M. A.; Aznar, F.;
ꢁ
ꢁ
Valdes, C. Chem.;Eur. J. 2005, 11, 2276–2283. (d) Varela-Fernandez,
ꢁ
ꢁ
´
guez, C.; Varela, J. A.; Castedo, L.; Saa, C. Org.
A.; Gonzalez-Rodrı
Lett. 2009, 11, 5350–5353. (e) Churruca, F.; SanMartin, R.; Tellitu, I.;
Domınguez, E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 12, 2481–2490.
(12) (a) Bruker, SAINT V7.68A; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI,
´
€
2005. (b) Sheldrick, G. M. SADABS 2008/2; Gottingen, 2008. (c) Sheldrick,
(10) Ackermann, L.; Vicente, R.; Kapdi, A. Angew. Chem. 2009, 121,
9976–10011. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9792–9826.
G. M. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 2008, 64, 112–122. (d) Flack, H. D. Acta
Crystallogr., Sect. A 1983, 39, 876–881.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2012
347