C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. EH-Catalyzed Desymmetrization of Aryl meso-Epoxidesa
Enantioselective ring opening of meso-epoxides has proven to
be challenging to accomplish through conventional chemical
methods. We have demonstrated that a viable biocatalytic solution
can be developed using a diverse set of microbial epoxide
hydrolases that were discovered from nature. Enzymes were
identified that are capable of selectively hydrolyzing a wide range
of meso-epoxides and the corresponding chiral (R,R)-diols were
furnished with high ee’s and yields. Moreover, the first EHs
providing access to complementary (S,S)-diols also were found.
Given the high activity and selectivity, as well as broad sequence
divergence and substrate scope, our expanding EH library is
expected to find wide utility in the synthesis of a range of chiral
1,2-diols.
Acknowledgment. We thank P. Kretz, D. Wyborski, W. Callen,
T. Richardson, M. Podar, T. Todaro, M. Lafferty, J. McElhinney,
L. Bibbs, W. Yu, X. Tan, P. Chen, A. Flordeliza, C. Cowden, F.
Bartnek, S. Wells, and E. Mathur for their assistance. J. M. Short
is gratefully acknowledged for guidance. This work was partially
supported by NIH SBIR grant 1R43GM65669-01A1.
a Reaction conditions as in Table 1. b,c See Table 1. d Enantioselectivities
were determined by chiral HPLC analysis.
Table 3. (S,S)-Diols via Desymmetrization of meso-Epoxidesa
Supporting Information Available: Materials and methods and
amino acid sequences. This material is available free of charge via the
References
(1) Hannessian, S. Total Synthesis of Natural Products. The Chiron Approach;
Pergamon Press: New York, 1983; Chapter 2.
(2) For an alternative approach to the synthesis of optically active 1,2-diols,
see: Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. ReV.
1994, 94, 2483-2547.
(3) (a) Jacobsen, E. N.; Kakiuchi, F.; Konsler, R. G.; Larrow, J. F.; Tokunaga,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 773-776. (b) Matsunaga, S.; Das, J.; Roels,
J.; Vogl, E. M.; Yamamoto, N.; Iida, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Shibasaki, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2252-2260.
(4) For example, only two meso-epoxides were ring-opened at high ee and
others were at <80% ee in the (salen)-Co-catalyzed addition of benzoic
acid.3a
(5) (a) Archelas, A.; Furstoss, R. Annu. ReV. Microbiol. 1997, 51, 491-525.
(b) Armstrong, R. N. In ComprehensiVe Natural Products Chemistry;
Barton, D., Nakanishi, K., Meth-Cohn, O., Eds.; Pergamon Press: New
York, 1999; Vol. 5, Chapter 4, pp 51-70.
(6) Hydrolysis of several meso-epoxides by liver microsomes containing
mammalian EH has been reported: (a) Bellucci, G.; Capitani, I.; Chiappe,
C.; Marioni, F. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 1170-1171. (b)
Bellucci, G.; Chiappe, C.; Marioni, F. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1989, 2369-2373.
(7) (a) Faber, K.; Orru, R. V. A. In Enzyme Catalysis in Organic Synthesis:
A ComprehensiVe Handbook; Drauz, K., Waldmann, H., Eds.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, 2002; Vol. II, p 592, and references therein. (b) The
only reported example using a bacterial epoxide hydrolase was the
hydrolysis of cyclohexene oxide and N-benezyloxycarbonyl-3,4-epoxy-
pyrrolidine: Chang, D.; Wang, Z.; Heringa, R. W.; Witholt, B.; Li, Z.
Chem. Commun. 2003, 960-961. Whole cells were used, and the sequence
and identity of the responsible EH were unknown.
a Reaction conditions as in Table 1. b,c See Table 1. Enantioselectivities
were determined by chiral HPLC d or GC e analysis.
reduction also was observed for the 2-fluoro analogue, which
suggests that steric hindrance may be primarily responsible for the
rate decrease. BD8877 performed particularly well on dipyridyl
substrates; the highest specific activity and ee were observed with
bis(2-pyridyl) epoxide (entry 6). Reactions with substituted cis-
stilbene oxide and dipyridyl epoxides were successfully performed
at the 0.1 g scale with BD8877.9
To our knowledge, all previously reported microbial EHs have
been observed to predominantly form (R,R)-diols from meso-
epoxides.7,12 We now have found in our EH library the first
examples of (S,S)-selective enzymes for desymmetrization of meso-
epoxides. As summarized in Table 3, these EH-catalyzed reactions
exhibited moderate to excellent ee (56-99%), although reaction
rates were generally ∼50-200-fold lower relative to those of (R,R)-
diol-producing enzymes.
(8) (a) Robertson, D. E.; Mathur, M. J.; Swanson, R. V.; Marrs, B. L.; Short,
J. M. SIM News 1996, 46, 3-8. (b) Short, J. M. Nature Biotech. 1997,
15, 1322-1323. (c) Henne, A.; Daniel, R.; Schmitz, R. A.; Gottschalk,
G. Appl. EnViron. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 3901-3907. (d) Short, J. M. U.S.
Patent 5,958,672, 1999.
(9) For further details, see the Supporting Information.
(10) The formed acyloxy intermediate is subsequently hydrolyzed by water to
afford 1,2-diol product. Lacourciere, G. M.; Armstrong, R. N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10466-10467.
(11) (a) Rink, R.; Fennema, M.; Smids, M.; Dehmel, U.; Janssen, D. B. J.
Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 14650-14657. (b) Morisseau, C.; Archelas, A.;
Guitton, C.; Faucher, D.; Furstoss, R.; Baratti, J. C. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999,
263, 386-395.
(12) Mammalian EH showed opposite enantioselectivity on several substrates
with rigid tricyclic structures: Bellucci, G.; Berti, G.; Chiappe, C.; Fabri,
F.; Marioni, F. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 968-970.
JA0466210
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 36, 2004 11157