1258
I.A. Akinbulu, T. Nyokong / Polyhedron 29 (2010) 1257–1270
The focus of the present study is to report the synthesis and
2.4. Synthesis
investigate the effects of the nature and position of substituent
on both the spectral, electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical
qualities of new CoPc complexes tetra-substituted with diethylam-
inoethanethio (peripherally: complex 3a and non-peripheral: com-
plex 3b) and benzylmercapto (non-peripherally: complex 5)
substituents. The presence of these substituents makes these com-
plexes good candidates in the formation of thin films, either by
electrochemical polymerization or self-assembly technique, thus
facilitating their use as electrocatalysts and in the development
of electrochemical sensors. The synthesis of CoPc peripherally
octa-substituted with diethylaminoethanethio has been reported
[9]. This work reports on the peripherally (3a) and non-peripher-
ally (3b) tetra-substituted CoPc derivatives. The synthesis of CoPc
peripherally tetra-substituted with benzylmercapto (6) has also
been reported [10]. This work reports on the non-peripheral sub-
stitution with benzylmercapto (5).
2.4.1. 4-(2-Diethylaminoethanethiol) phthalonitrile (2a) and 3-(2-
diethylaminoethanethiol) phthalonitrile (2b)
4-Nitrophthalonitrile (compound 1a, Scheme 1a) and 3-
nitrophthalonitrile (compound 1b, Scheme 1b), were synthesized
according to reported procedure [11]. Compound 2a was synthe-
sized using the method reported for the synthesis of 1,2-bis-(dieth-
ylaminoethanethiol)-4,5-dicyanobenzene
[12]
with
some
modifications as follows: compound 1a (3.05 g, 17.6 mmol) was
dissolved in anhydrous DMF (150 ml) under nitrogen and 2-dieth-
ylaminoethanethiol hydrochloride (9 g, 53.0 mmol) was added.
After stirring for 10 min, finely ground anhydrous K2CO3 (29.3 g,
212.0 mmol) was added in portions over 2 h with stirring. The
reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h under
nitrogen. Then the solution was poured into ice (900 g). The precip-
itate was filtered off, washed with water, until the filtrate was neu-
tral. The product was then dried in air. Yield: 3.42 g (75%). IR (KBr)
m
max/cmꢀ1: 3084–3018 (Ar–C–H), 2968–2807 (CH2), 2229 (CN),
2. Experimental
1582, 1542, 1471, 1384, 1289, 1225, 1198, 1142, 1072, 987, 906,
825, 732, 609, 521. 1H NMR (CDCl3) d = 7.66–7.54 (m, 3H, Ar–H),
3.15–312 (t, 2H, SCH2), 2.80–2.77 (t, 2H, NCH2), 2.62–2.57 (qnt,
4H, CH2C), 1.07–1.03 (t, 6H, CH3) ppm.
2.1. Materials
Potassium carbonate, cobalt chloride, 2-(diethylaminoethane-
thiol) hydrochloride and 2-diethylaminoethanol were obtained
from Sigma–Aldrich. Benzylmercapto thiol was obtained from Flu-
ka. Tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TBABF4) (Aldrich) was
used as the electrolyte for electrochemical experiments. Aluminum
oxide, WN-3: neutral and Silica Gel 60 (0.04–0.063 mm), for col-
umn chromatography, were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich and
Merck, respectively. Dimethylformamide (DMF), dichloromethane
(DCM) and dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) were obtained from
Merck. DMF, DMSO, DCM, methanol and ethanol were distilled be-
fore use.
Compound 2b, Scheme 1b, was synthesized following the meth-
od described above for compound 2a, using 3-nitrophthalonitrile
(compound 1b) in place of 4-nitrophthalonitrile (compound 1a).
Yield: 2.74 g (60%). IR (KBr) m
max/cmꢀ1: 2969–2814 (CH2), 2229
(mCN), 1565, 1520, 1445, 1372, 1290, 1231, 1193, 1133, 1065,
1029, 987, 855, 787, 730, 547, 439. 1H NMR (CDCl3) d = 7.73–7.56
(m, 3H, Ar–H), 3.22–3.19 (t, 2H, SCH2), 2.82–2.79 (t, 2H, NCH2),
2.61–2.58 (dd, 4H, CH2C), 1.06–1.02 (t, 6H, CH3) ppm.
2.4.2. 3-(Benzylmercapto) phthalonitrile (4)
Compound 4 was synthesized (Scheme 2) following the proce-
dure reported for 4-(benzylmercapto) phthalonitrile [10] with
some modifications as follows: compound 1b (6 g, 34.68 mmol)
was dissolved in anhydrous DMSO (50 ml) under nitrogen and ben-
zylmercapto thiol (5.55 g, 45 mmol) was added. After stirring
strongly for 20 min, finely ground anhydrous K2CO3 (15 g,
108.7 mmol) was added in portions over 2 h with stirring. The
reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h under
nitrogen. Thereafter, the crude product was precipitated out from
the reaction mixture with ice (600 g). The precipitate was filtered
off, washed with water, until the filtrate was neutral. The product
was crystallized twice from ethanol and dried in air. Yield: 1.91 g
2.2. Electrochemical studies
All electrochemical experiments were performed using Autolab
potentiostat PGSTAT 302 (Eco Chemie, Utrecht, The Netherlands)
driven by the general purpose Electrochemical System data pro-
cessing software (GPES, software version 4.9). Square wave voltam-
metric analysis was carried out at a frequency of 10 Hz, amplitude:
50 mV and step potential: 5 mV. A conventional three-electrode
system was used. The working electrode was a bare glassy carbon
electrode (GCE), Ag|AgCl wire and platinum wire were used as the
pseudo reference and auxiliary electrodes, respectively. The poten-
tial response of the Ag|AgCl pseudo-reference electrode was less
than the Ag|AgCl (3M KCl) by 0.015 0.003 V. Prior to use, the elec-
trode surface was polished with alumina on a Buehler felt pad and
rinsed with excess millipore water. All electrochemical experi-
ments were performed in freshly distilled dry DMF containing
TBABF4 as supporting electrolyte.
(22%). IR (KBr)
(CH2), 2226 (
m : 3067–3031 (Ar–C–H), 2936–2852
max/cmꢀ1
m
CN), 1961, 1561, 1500, 1447, 1289, 1187, 1155,
1066, 1030, 911, 854, 785, 709, 589, 555, 483, 434. 1H NMR (CDCl3)
d = 7.62–7.55 (m, 3H, S–Ar–H), 7.36–7.30 (m, 5H, C–Ar–H), 4.31 (s,
2H, CH2) ppm.
2.4.3. Cobalt tetrakis-(2-diethylaminoethanethiol) phthalocyanines:
3a (peripheral) and 3b (non-peripheral)
Complexes 3a (Scheme 1a) and 3b (Scheme 1b) were synthe-
sized following the method reported for the octa-substituted ana-
logue [12] with some modifications.
Spectroelectrochemical data were obtained using a home-made
optically transparent thin-layer electrochemical (OTTLE) cell which
was connected to
voltammograph.
a Bioanalytical Systems (BAS) CV 27
2.4.3.1. Complex 3a, Scheme 1a. A mixture of compound 2a (0.40 g,
1.54 mmol) and cobalt(II) chloride (0.049 g, 0.38 mmol) was re-
fluxed in 2-(diethylaminoethanol) (1.2 ml) for 12 h under nitrogen.
Thereafter, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and trea-
ted with excess MeOH:H2O (1:1) to precipitate the crude deep blue
product. The product was filtered and dried in air. Purification was
achieved using column chromatography with neutral alumina as
column material and DCM/MeOH (10:1) as eluent. Yield: 1.08 g
(64%). Anal. Calc. for C56H68N12S4CoꢁCH2Cl2: C, 56.95; H, 5.76; N,
2.3. Equipment
UV–Vis spectra were recorded on Cary 50 UV–Vis/NIR spectro-
photometer. IR (KBr discs) was recorded on Bruker Vertex 70-Ram
II spectrophotometer. Elemental analysis was performed using
Vario Elementar Microcube EL111. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance
(1H NMR, 400 MHz) was obtained in CDCl3 using Bruker EMX 400
NMR spectrometer.