is important for both synthetic chemistry and material
sciences. Diarylfluorenes with the same two aryl groups were
mainly applied in OLEDs, PLEDs, and fuel cells.8a,d In
recent years, more and more unsymmetric diarylfluorenes
were utilized based on newly developed synthetic methods.9
However, the developed methods were mainly based on
FriedelꢀCrafts type reactions, which have many limitations
on substrate scope, such as fluorenes containing electronic-
poor aryl and meta-substituted aryl groups.9b,10 These lim-
ited the further applications of diarylfluorenes in material
sciences. Therefore, there is still high demand for novel
and efficient synthetic methods for the access of this type
of compounds.
We started our research by using compounds 1 and 2a as
the standard substrates with Pd as the catalyst to optimize
the reaction conditions. First, several phosphorus ligands
were investigated by using KOtBu as the base and toluene
as the solvent at 100 °C (Table 1 entries 1ꢀ6). A rigid
bidentate ligand dppf afforded a trace amount of the
coupling product. When dppe was applied as the ligand,
it also afforded a trace amount of the coupling product.
However, when more labile bidentate ligand dppb was
utilized, 42% of 3a was obtained. It seemed that the more
labile the bidentate ligand, the higher the yield. Therefore,
2 equivof themonodendate ligandPPh3 wasthenscreened,
which indeed turned out to be the most suitable ligand for
this transformation and afforded the coupling product in
a 95% yield. Moreover, nitrogen ligand phenanthroline
gave a 64% yield of 3a and no extra ligand provided 13%
of the coupling product. Then, we tried to use a weaker base
to replace KOtBu. However, the results exhibited that the
weaker the base, the lower the yield (NaOtBu, 37%;
NaOH, 22%; K3PO4, trace). We also tried to optimize
the reaction temperature. However, when the reaction
temperaturewasloweredtortor60°C, onlyatraceamount
of 3a was observed. A temperature higher than 80 °C
afforded the coupling product in an 84% yield. Solvent
testing showed that other solvents could also afford the
coupling product, but toluene was still the best choice for
this transformation. Therefore, based on these condition
screenings, the final optimized conditions included 5 mol %
of [Pd(dba)2], 10 mol % of PPh3, 1.2 equiv of aryl bromide,
1.2 equiv of KOtBu in toluene at 100 °C for 8ꢀ10 h.
Table 1. Palladium Catalyzed Arylation of Monoarylfluorenea
temp
yield
(%)b
entry
ligand
base
solvent
(°C)
1
dppf
dppe
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
NaOtBu
NaOH
K3PO4
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
dioxane
THF
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
rt
trace
trace
42
2
3
dppb
4
PPh3
phenanthroline
ꢀ
95
5
64
6c
7
13
PPh3
37
8
PPh3
22
9
PPh3
trace
trace
trace
84
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
PPh3
PPh3
60
PPh3
80
PPh3
100
100
100
100
34
PPh3
83
PPh3
DMF
54
PPh3
DMSO
44
a Reaction conditions: 1 (121 mg, 0.5 mmol), 2a (102 mg, 0.6 mmol),
5 mol % Pd(dba)2, 10 mol % ligand, base (0.6 mmol, 1.2 equiv). b Yields
were determined by GC. c No ligand.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, a
variety of substrates were tested. Most of the employed
aryl bromides reacted smoothly with 1 under the standard
conditions to afford the corresponding products in good to
excellent yields (Scheme 1). CꢀF or CꢀCl bonds were well
tolerated, and thecoupling products wereobtainedingood
yields (3b, 3c, 3j, 3k) . It was worth noting that one of the
two CꢀBr bonds of 1,4-dibromobenzene could be well
preserved by carefully controlling the ratio of the starting
materials to be 1:5, which offered the opportunity for
further functionalizations (3d). However, when the ratio
was changed to 2.5:1, a good yield was easily obtained for
3h which has been shown to be a wide-energy-gap host
material for OLEDs.11 It was shown that steric hindrance
has a certain influence on the coupling reaction, and a
relativelylow yield wasobtained (3i). Wealsoextended our
reaction to some bromo-heterocycles. To our delight, N-
methyl-3-bromocarbazole gave the coupling product 3l in
74% yield. 3-Bromopyridine was also proved to be a
compatible substrate under our standard conditions,
which afforded product 3e in 65% yield. In the case of
2-bromothiophene and 3-bromothiophene, low yields
were obtained (39% for 3g and 54% for 3f). Electron-rich
aryl bromides also worked well and afforded the coupling
products in good yields (3l, 3n, 3o, 3p). β-Naphthalene
bromide and its derivative were readily converted to the
corresponding products (3q, 3r) in 91% and 84% yields,
(8) (a) Beaupre, S.; Boudreault, P.-L. T.; Leclerc, M. Adv. Mater.
2010, 22, E6. (b) Koyama, Y.; Nakazono, K.; Hayashi, H.; Tataka, T.
Chem. Lett. 2010, 39, 2. (c) Abbel, R.; Schenning, A. P. H. J.; Meijer,
E. W. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. 2009, 47, 4215. (d) Miyatake, K.;
Bae, B.; Watanabe, M. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2, 1919. (e) Xie, L.-H.; Yin,
C.-R.; Lai, W.-Y.; Fan, Q.-L.; Huang, W. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37,
1192.
(9) (a) Chen, R.-T.; Chen, S.-H.; Hsieh, B.-Y.; Chen, Y. J. Polym.
Sci., Polym. Chem. 2009, 47, 2821. (b) Xie, L.-H.; Hou, X.-Y.; Hua,
Y.-R.; Tang, C.; Liu, F.; Fan, Q.-L.; Huang, W. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3701.
(c) Ren, B.-Y.; Ou, C.-J.; Zhang, C.; Chang, Y.-Z.; Yi, M.-D.; Liu, J.-Q.;
Xie, L.-H.; Zhang, G.-W.; Deng, X.-Y.; Li, S.-B.; Wei, W.; Huang, W.
J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 8881. (d) Xie, L.-H.; Ling, Q.-D.; Hou,
X.-Y.; Huang, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2120.
(10) (a) Ego, C.; Grimsdale, A. C.; Uckert, F.; Yu, G.; Srdanov, G.;
€
Mullen, K. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 809. (b) Wu, C. C.; Liu, T. L.; Hung,
W. Y.; Lin, Y. T.; Wong, K. T.; Chen, R. T.; Chen, Y. M.; Chien, Y. Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3710. (c) Kawasaki, S.; Yamada, M.;
Kobori, K.; Jin, F. Z.; Kondo, Y.; Hayashi, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Takata, T.
Macromolecules 2007, 40, 5284.
(11) Ye, S. H.; Liu, Y. Q.; Di, C. A.; Xi, H. X.; Wu, W. P.; Wen, Y. G.;
Lu, K.; Du, C. Y.; Liu, Y.; Yu, G. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 1333.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 12, 2013
3103