2526
J. Kim et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 2522–2526
G. A.; La Voie, E. J. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 3147; (e) Chen, X.; Wang, W. Annu. Rep.
Compounds which exhibited significant potency against HIV-1
Med. Chem. 2003, 38, 333; (f) Meanwell, N. A. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 2529.
14. (a) Epple, R.; Cow, C.; Xie, Y. P.; Azimioara, M.; Russo, R.; Wang, X.; Wityak, J.;
Karanewsky, D. S.; Tuntland, T.; Nguyen-Tran, V. T. B.; Ngo, C. C.; Huang, D.;
Saez, E.; Spalding, T.; Gerken, A.; Iskandar, M.; Seidel, H. M.; Tian, S. S. J. Med.
Chem. 2010, 53, 77; (b) Hammar, W. J.; Rustad, M. A. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1981,
18, 885.
15. Evans, D. A.; Cee, V. J.; Smith, T. E.; Santiago, K. J. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 87.
16. Other protecting groups tried in this reaction were THP, 2,4-dimethoxybenzyl,
4-methoxybenzyl, MOM, Boc groups.
replication in a cell-based assay were further evaluated for their
metabolic stability in vitro.21 Test results were summarized in
Table 2. Ketone analogs (16b, 16f, 16h) displayed poor metabolic
stability similar to the corresponding ester analog 2. Gratifyingly,
however, oxazole analog 26a and thiazole analog 26b exhibited
markedly improved metabolic stability in vitro while retaining
significant antiviral activity against HIV-1 replication.
17. General procedure for Biginelli reaction with b-keto heteroazoles: To a mixture of
aryl aldehyde (1.0 equiv), urea (1.5 equiv), and b-keto oxazole (thiazole, or
imidazole) (1.0 equiv) was added acetic acid (0.2 M) and stirred at 110 °C for
16 h. The reaction was slowly quenched with saturated aqueous K2CO3
(caution: gas evolution!) and extracted with EtOAc (3ꢁ). The combined
organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo.
The residue was redissolved with CH2Cl2 and crystallized by the slow addition
of hexanes. The resulting precipitate was filtered and washed with cold CH2Cl2/
n-hexanes (1:1) solution. Alternatively, the concentrated residue was directly
subjected to flash column chromatography (SiO2, CH2Cl2/MeOH = 19:1) to give
Biginelli adducts. Compound 26a 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) d 7.34 (s, 1H),
7.25 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.44
(s, 1H), 2.70 (m, 2H), 2.40 (m, 1H), 1.92 (m, 2H), 1.72 (m, 2H), 1.65 (m, 1H),
1.35–1.24 (m, 5H), 1.94 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) d 159.6,
152.4, 146.4, 143.3, 136.1, 131.5, 128.0, 125.8, 120.1, 116.2, 98.0, 54.6, 35.6,
31.9, 31.4, 25.8, 25.7, 23.8, 20.2, 11.7; Enantiomerically pure forms were
obtained by chiral HPLC (OD-H preparative column, 20% i-PrOH in n-hexanes,
In summary, novel dihydropyrimidinone analogs (6, 12, 16a–16j,
26a–26c) were designed and synthesized to optimize metabolic sta-
bility. In particular, replacement of the ester moiety by bioisosteres
dramatically improved the metabolic liability while retaining anti-
viral activity against HIV-1. These novel and potent DHPMs contain-
ing ester bioisosteres could serve as advanced lead compounds for
further development. Mode of action and further optimization of
this lead compound will be reported in due course.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research foundation
of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST)
(No. 2011-00244), Gyeonggi-do and KISTI.
6.5 mL/min, tR = 20.5 min): 26b mp 186 °C; ½a D26
ꢂ
+8.1 (c 0.001, MeOH); 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CD3OD) d 7.22 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (s,
1H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.39 (s, 1H), 2.63 (m, 3H), 1.96 (m, 2H), 1.79 (m,
2H), 1.71 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 1.46–1.25 (m, 5H), 1.22 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H); 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) d 164.7, 163.2, 155.7, 153.9, 142.1, 137.1, 129.8, 127.5,
122.5, 117.6, 111.5, 105.4, 58.6, 41.7, 34.1, 33.7, 27.4, 25.0, 12.7; TLC Rf (CH2Cl2/
MeOH 19:1) = 0.42; HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C21H24ClN3O2S (M)+ 417.1277,
found 417.1282; Enantiomerically pure forms were obtained by chiral HPLC
(OD-H preparative column, 20% i-PrOH in n-hexanes, 6.5 mL/min,
tR = 18.1 min).
References and notes
1. Xu, H.; Lv, M. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 2120.
2. Mehellou, Y.; De Clercq, E. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 521. and references cited
therein.
3. (a) Brenner, B.; Wainberg, M. A.; Salomon, H.; Rouleau, D.; Dascal, A.; Spira, B.;
Sekaly, R. P.; Conway, B.; Routy, J. P. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2000, 16, 429; (b)
Si-Mohamed, A.; Kazatchkine, M.; Heard, I.; Goujon, C.; Prazuck, T.; Aymard, G.;
Cessot, G.; Kuo, Y. H.; Bernard, M. C.; Diquet, B.; Malkin, J. E.; Gutmann, L.;
Belec, L. J. Infect. Dis. 2000, 182, 112; (c) Kiertiburanakul, S.; Sungkanuparph, S.
Curr. HIV Res. 2009, 7, 273; (d) Wensing, A. M. J.; van de Vijver, D. A.; Angarano,
G. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 192, 1501.
4. Kim, J.; Park, C.; Ok, T.; So, W.; Jo, M.; Seo, M.; Kim, Y.; Sohn, J.-H.; Park, Y.; Ju,
M. K.; Kim, J.; Han, S.-J.; Kim, T.-H.; Cechetto, J.; Nam, J.; Sommer, P.; No, Z.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 2119.
5. Sabitha, G.; Reddy, G. S. K. K.; Reddy, K. B.; Yadav, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
6497.
6. Kappe, C. O.; Perez, R.; Beryozkina, T.; Zbruyev, O. I.; Haas, W. J. Comb. Chem.
2002, 4, 501.
7. (a) Holmquist, C. R.; Roskamp, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3258; (b) Kopecky, D.
J.; Rychnovsky, S. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8420.
8. General procedure for Biginelli reaction with b-keto esters: The b-keto ester 9
(200 mg, 0.632 mmol), 3-hydroxybenzaldehyde (77 mg, 0.632 mmol), urea
(57 mg, 0.948 mmol), and Yb(OTf)3 (39 mg, 0.063 mmol) were dissolved in
acetonitrile (1.6 mL) and stirred under Argon for 24 h at 90 °C. After cooling to
room temperature, the reaction was quenched by the addition of saturated
aqueous NaHCO3 (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (4 ꢁ 20 mL). The
combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4. After filtration and
concentration in vacuo, the residue was purified by flash column
chromatography (SiO2, n-hexanes/EtOAc = 5:1?1:1 then CH2Cl2/MeOH =
20:1) to give Biginelli adduct 10 (164 mg, 56%) as a yellow solid: 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CD3OD) d 7.88 (s, 1H), 7.01 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.76–6.73 (m, 2H), 6.64
(d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.39 (s, 1H), 5.22 (s, 1H), 4.04–3.94 (m, 4H), 3.07–2.97 (m,
2H), 1.12–1.02 (m, 24H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) d 165.7, 156.5, 153.1,
148.8, 144.9, 129.7, 117.8, 114.9, 113.7, 101.5, 62.0, 60.1, 55.1, 33.6, 17.9, 14.0;
TLC Rf (CH2Cl2:MeOH 10:1) = 0.42.
18. HIV full replication assay. CEMx174-LTR-GFP cells (clone CG8) were seeded
with a microplate dispenser (WellMate; Thermo Scientific Matrix; USA) at a
density of 4000 cells/well into 384-well glass plates (Evotec. Hamburg,
Germany) pre-dispensed with 10 lL of compound diluted in DMSO and
incubated for 1 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Then cells were infected with HIV-1LAI at a
multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 3 and incubated for 5 days at 37 °C, 5% CO2.
Fluorescence intensities were the determined using a multilabel plate reader
(Victor3; PerkinElmer, Inc.; USA). And see: Sommer, P.; Vartanian, J. P.;
Wachsmuth, M.; Henry, M.; Guetard, D.; Wain-Hobson, S. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 344,
11.
19. Brooks, B. R.; Bruccoleri, R. E.; Olafson, B. D.; States, D. J.; Swaminathan, S.;
Karplus, M. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4, 187–217.
20. Discovery Studio, version 3.1; Accelrys Inc.: San Diego, CA.
21. (a) Materials: Human, Rat Microsomes and NADPH regenerating system were
purchased from BD Gentest (Woburn, MA). Liquid chromatographic analysis
was performed on the instrument of Agilent 1200 series equipped with a
diode-array detector and autosampler (Agilent Technology, Piscataway, NJ). An
analytical column was applied after the trapping cartridges (Phenomenex,
Gemini C18 50 mm ꢁ 2.0 mm, 3
lm, Torrance, CA). A quadrupole LC mass
spectrometer (Agilent Technology, Piscataway, NJ), with electrospray
ionization (ESI) was employed for sample analysis. Instruments were
controlled by ChemStation software (Version 2.0, Agilent Technology,
Piscataway, NJ).; (b) Methods: Compounds (2 lM final concentration) are
incubated with liver microsomes (rat and human) in potassium phosphate
buffer. The microsomal protein concentration in the assay is 0.5 mg/mL and the
final percent DMSO is 0.2%. Reaction is started by the addition of NADPH and
stopped either immediately or at 5, 10, 30, 60 and 120 min for a precise
estimate of clearance. The corresponding loss of parent compound is
determined by LC/MS. The mobile phases were (A) water with 0.1% of formic
acid and (B) acetonitrile with 0.1% of formic acid at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min.
The LC conditions were 5% B at 0 min, a linear gradient from 5% to 50% B over
1 min, held at 50% for 0.5 min, then ramped from 50% to 95% over 0.5 min,
followed by 95% B for 1.5 min and back to 5% B over 0.5 min, then held at 5% B
for the remaining 3.5 min.; (c) Data analysis: % remaining of compound is
calculated compared to the initial quantity at time zero. Half-life is then
calculated based on first-order reaction kinetics.
9. Steliou, K.; Poupart, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7130.
10. Menche, D.; Arikan, F.; Li, J.; Rudolph, S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 267.
11. Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277.
12. Enantiomerically pure forms were obtained by chiral HPLC (Daicel Chiralcel AD
column).
13. (a) Burger, A. Prog. Drug Res. 1991, 37, 287; (b) Thornber, C. W. Chem. Soc. Rev.
1979, 8, 563; (c) Lipinski, C. A. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem. 1986, 21, 283; (d) Patani,