1066
W. Qian et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 1061–1067
Table 5 (continued)
a
Compound
Ar
R1NR2
hB1 IC50 (nM)
HLMb
NDc
(lL/min/mg)
N
20
21
2,5-Me2-4-ClPh
152 108
N
N
2,5-Me2-4-ClPh
2,5-Me2-4-ClPh
38 24
235
NDc
N
N
N
22
23.4 6.3
23
24
2,5-Me2-4-ClPh
2,5-Me2-4-ClPh
2.7 0.22
64
60
N
N
N
N
4.75 3.22
H
N
25
2,5-Me2-4-ClPh
2,5-Me2-4-ClPh
136 105
1.53 1.0
NDc
28
N
N
H
N
26
a
IC50s are reported as the average SD of at least two or more determinations.
The experiments are performed with two replicates for each compound. The percent difference between replicates must be less than or equal to 20% in order for the
b
results to be considered valid.
c
ND: not determined.
even as a mixture of stereoisomers. The gem-2,2-dimethyl com-
pound 11d removed one stereocenter and further improved the
potency to 17 nM. Not surprisingly, this more lipophilic derivative
suffered higher metabolic clearance and the metabolite ID indi-
cated that the gem-2,2-dimethyl cyclohexyl unit was the major
site for metabolism. To address this issue, an oxygen atom was in-
serted into the six-membered ring, resulting in much better micro-
somal clearance and comparable potency (11g). Insertion of a basic
nitrogen atom (11f) led to over 100-fold enhancement in potency
and better stability compared to 11a. The functional potency was
significantly improved to sub-nanomolar in 11h by combining
the gem-2,2-dimethyl of 11d and the basic nitrogen of 11f. Analog
11i, the stereoisomer of 11h, was over 2000-fold less potent. N-
alkylation on 11h had minimum effect on antagonist activity
(11j–r).
In summary, sulfonyl dehydro-oxopiperazine acetamides are a
novel class of compact and stable B1 receptor antagonists. Com-
pared to its saturated counterpart, this highly potent pharmaco-
phore enables reduction of the size of the right hand side tetralin
amine moieties while maintaining the potency at low nanomolar
in B1 functional assay. This work also suggests that the dehydro-
oxopiperazine scaffold might have broader application in medici-
nal chemistry in the future.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Dr. Jennifer Allen for insightful discussions.
References and notes
Having confirmed that high potency can be maintained with
much smaller heterocycles on the right hand side, we then looked
into the effect of different aryl sulfonyl groups (Table 5). No signif-
icant improvement was obtained with more lipophilic substitu-
tions (12–16). No dramatic decrease in metabolic stability was
observed in these compounds possessing a basic amine moiety of
lower molecular weight compared to 2a.
In order to further explore the SAR, the aryl sulfonyl dehydro-
oxopiperazine pharmacophore was coupled to a series of small sec-
ondary amines on the right hand side (17–26, Table 5). Interest-
ingly, the distance and the relative geometry between the two
nitrogen atoms had a dramatic effect on potency. While pyrrolidine
and piperidine analogs afforded moderate potency, the seven- and
eight-membered ring analogs such as 23 and 24 can drive the
functional IC50 to low single digit nanomolar. Two more rigid
bicyclic diamines were also investigated. The spiral pyrrolidine
compound 26 was much more potent than the fused pyrrolidine
analogue 25.
1. Ahluwalia, A.; Perretti, M. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1999, 20, 100.
2. Leeb-Lundberg, L. M. F.; Marceau, F.; Mueller-Esterl, W.; Pettibone, D. J.; Zuraw,
B. L. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005, 57, 27.
3. Marceau, F.; Regoli, D. Nat. Rev. 2004, 3, 845.
4. Huang, H.; Player, M. R. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 5383.
5. Kuduk, S. D.; Bock, M. G. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2008, 8, 1420.
6. Chen, J. J.; Johnson, E. J. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2007, 11, 21.
7. Chen, J. J.; Biswas, K. Prog. Med. Chem. 2008, 46, 173.
8. Duchene, J.; Ahluwalia, A. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2009, 9, 125.
9. D’Amico, D. C.; Aya, T.; Human, J.; Fotsch, C.; Chen, J. J.; Biswas, K.; Riahi, B.;
Norman, M. H.; Willoughby, C. A.; Hungate, R.; Reider, P. J.; Biddlecome, G.;
Lester-Zeiner, D.; Van Staden, C.; Johnson, E.; Kamassah, A.; Arik, L.; Wang, J.;
Viswanadhan, V. N.; Groneberg, R. D.; Zhan, J.; Suzuki, H.; Toro, A.; Mareska, D.
A.; Clarke, D. E.; Harvey, D. M.; Burgess, L. E.; Laird, E. R.; Askew, B.; Ng, G. J.
Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 607.
10. Fotsch, C.; Biddlecome, G.; Biswas, K.; Chen, J. J.; D’Amico, D. C.; Groneberg, R.
D.; Han, N. B.; Hsieh, F.-Y.; Kamassah, A.; Kumar, G.; Lester-Zeiner, D.; Liu, Q.;
Mareska, D. A.; Riahi, B. B.; Wang, Y.-J. J.; Yang, K.; Zhan, J.; Zhu, J.; Johnson, E.;
Ng, G.; Askew, B. C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 2071.
11. Biswas, K.; Li, A.; Chen, J. J.; D’Amico, D. C.; Fotsch, C.; Han, N.; Human, J.; Liu,
Q.; Norman, M. H.; Riahi, B.; Yuan, C.; Suzuki, H.; Mareska, D. A.; Zhan, J.;
Clarke, D. E.; Toro, A.; Groneberg, R. D.; Burgess, L. E.; Lester-Zeiner, D.;
Biddlecome, G.; Manning, B. H.; Arik, L.; Dong, H.; Huang, M.; Kamassah, A.;